CSUS FACULTY SENATE ACTIONS FOR 2011-2012
Note: Minutes and
procedural actions not included.
DATE |
SENATE ACTION # |
TITLE |
APPROVED (SENATE)-YES/NO |
APPROVED (PRESIDENTIAL) - YES/NO |
COMMENTS |
8/24/11 |
PROGRAM PROPOSALS |
YES |
YES |
||
8/24/11 |
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS - UNIVERSITY |
YES |
YES |
||
8/24/11 |
UARTP POLICY - AMENDMENT OF SECTION 9.04.G |
YES |
YES |
||
8/24/11 |
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS - UNIVERSITY |
YES |
YES |
||
8/24/11 |
PRESIDENT GONZALEZ'S RESPONSE TO FACULTY SENATE'S POLICY ON INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM PRIORITIES: ACADEMIC PLANNING, RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT, RECEIPT OF |
YES |
NA |
||
9/1/11 |
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS |
YES |
NA |
||
9/1/11 |
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT - UNIVERSITY |
YES |
YES |
||
9/1/11 |
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS - UNIVERSITY |
YES |
YES |
||
9/1/11 |
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS - SENATE |
YES |
NA |
||
9/1/11 |
RESOLUTION ON CSU PRESIDENT SEARCHES |
YES |
NA |
||
9/15/11 |
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT - SENATE |
YES |
NA |
||
9/15/11 |
EARLY START IMPLEMENTATION ADVISORY GROUP |
YES |
YES |
||
9/15/11 |
WASC EDD INTERIM REPORT COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT |
YES |
NA |
||
9/15/11 |
PROGRAM IMPACTION FOR 2012-13, SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA-CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
YES |
YES |
||
9/15/11 |
PROGRAM IMPACTION FOR 2012-13, SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA-HEALTH SCIENCE PROGRAM |
YES |
YES |
||
9/15/11 |
PROGRAM IMPACTION FOR 2012-13, SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA-PSYCHOLOGY |
YES |
YES |
||
9/29/11 |
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS - SENATE |
YES |
NA |
||
9/29/11 |
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS - UNIVERSITY |
YES |
YES |
||
9/29/11 |
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS - SENATE |
YES |
NA |
||
9/29/11 |
GENERAL EDUCATION PERIODIC SYLLABI REVIEW PROCESS,
POSTPONEMENT OF |
YES |
YES |
||
9/29/11 |
PRESIDENT GONZALEZ’S RESPONSE TO FACULTY SENATE’S RECOMMENDED
POLICY ON INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM PRIORITIES: ACADEMIC PLANNING, RESOURCE
ALLOCATION AND ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT, ENDORSEMENT OF |
YES |
NA |
||
9/29/11 |
ACADEMIC PLANNING, RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND ENROLLMENT
MANAGEMENT, AMENDMENT OF |
YES |
YES |
||
10/6/11 |
UNIVERSITY BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE, CHANGE IN TERM OF
OFFICE |
YES |
NA |
||
10/6/11 |
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT - UNIVERSITY |
YES |
YES |
||
10/6/11 |
AD HOC COMMITTEE ON FACULTY RESPONSIBILITIES TO STUDENTS
IN THE INSTRUCTIONAL ENVIRONMENT, THANKS AND COMMENDATION |
YES |
NA |
||
10/6/11 |
REGISTRATION UNIT LIMITS |
YES |
YES |
||
10/27/11 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY |
YES |
|||
10/27/11 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – SENATE |
YES |
NA |
|
|
10/27/11 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY |
YES |
YES |
|
|
10/27/11 |
COMMENDATION
FOR CHERYL JOHNSON |
YES |
NA |
|
|
10/27/11 |
OUTSTANDING
SCHOLARY AND CREATIVE ACTIVITY AWARDS, AMENDMENT OF |
YES |
NA |
|
|
11/03/11 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – SENATE |
YES |
NA |
|
|
11/03/11 |
NOMINATION
AND ELECTION OF CHAIR, CURRICULUM POLICIES COMMITTEE |
YES |
NA |
|
|
11/03/11 |
SENATE
COMMITTEE ON INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM PRIORITIES, POSTPONEMENT OF |
YES |
NA |
|
|
11/03/11 |
REFERRAL
OF FACULTY RESPONSIBILITIES TO STUDENTS IN THE INSTRUCTIONAL ENVIRONMENT BACK
TO FACULTY POLICIES COMMITTEE |
YES |
NA |
|
|
11/03/11 |
RESOLUTION
ON A INTERIM POLICY TO FACULTY RESPONSIBILITIES TO STUDENTS IN THE
INSTRUCTIONAL ENVIRONMENT |
YES |
NA |
|
|
11/17/11 |
SENATE
COMMITTEE ON INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM PRIORITIES, ELECTION OF |
YES |
NA |
|
|
11/17/11 |
REFERRAL
TO APC, OF STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES, REVISIONS TO |
YES |
NA |
|
|
12/01/11 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – SENATE |
YES |
NA |
|
|
12/01/11 |
SECOND
BACHELOR’S POLICY, REVISIONS TO |
YES |
YES |
|
|
12/01/11 |
COMMENDATION
FOR DAVID WAGNER |
YES |
NA |
|
|
12/01/11 |
AREA
B LEARNINGOUTCOMES, REVISIONS TO |
YES |
YES |
|
|
12/01/11 |
AREA
B LEARNING OUTCOMES, REFERRED BACK TO GE/GRPC TO CLEAN UP CRITERIA LANGUAGE |
YES |
NA |
|
|
12/01/11 |
SENATE
FALL SCHEDULE, REVISIONS TO |
YES |
NA |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSALS |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSALS |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGRAM
PROPSOAL |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSAL |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGAM
PROPSOAL |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
INTERIM
POLICY ON PROGRAM IMPACTION |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGRAM
REVIEW – COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGRAM
REVIEW – ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGRAM
REVIEW – MECHANICAL ENGINEERING |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGRAM
REVIEW – CIVIL ENGINEERING |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSAL MA PROGRAM – TESOL |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT - UNIVERSITY |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGRAM
REVIEW – DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN’S STUDIES |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGRAM
REVIEW – GERONTOLOGY PROGRAM |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
PROGRAM
REVIEW – ASIAN STUDIES PROGRAM |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/02/12 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/16/12 |
PROGRAM
REVIEW – GEOLOGY |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/16/12 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – SENATE |
YES |
NA |
|
|
02/16/12 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/16/12 |
POLICY
ON INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM PRIORITIES: ACADEMIC PLANNING, RESOURCE ALLOCATION
AND ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT, AMENDMENT OF |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/16/12 |
MINIMUM
GRADES FOR UNDERGRADUATE PREREQUISITE COURSEWORK, AMENDMENT TO |
YES |
YES |
|
|
02/16/12 |
BA
AND BS POLICY CHANGE (UPPER UNITS IN MAJORS), REFERRAL |
YES |
NA |
|
|
02/16/12 |
ACADEMIC
RENEWAL, REVISIONS TO INCLUDE GRADUATE STUDENTS, POSTPONEMENT TO |
YES |
NA |
|
|
03/01/12 |
THE
FACULTY SENATE ADOPTS THE ATTACHED FOUR STATEMENTSS FROM THE AMERICAN
ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS (AAUP) TO SERVE AS GUIDING PRINCIPLES ON
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND ACADEMIC RESPONSIBILITY, AND FOR
FPC-APC DEVELOPMENT OF FACULTY AND STUDENTS RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
POLICIES. |
YES |
NA |
|
|
03/01/12 |
REFERENDUM
TO AMEND THE CONSITUTION OF THE FACULTY – CHANGE IN VOTING STATUS OF POLICY
COMMITTEE CHAIRS ON THE FACULTY SENATE FROM VOTING TO NON-VOTING, AND MINOR
EDITORIAL AMENDMENTS. |
YES |
NA |
|
|
03/01/12 |
REFERENDUM
TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE FACULTY-DELETE REQUIREMENT FOR SENATOR REPRESENTATION
ON ALL STANDING SENATE COMMITTEES, AND MINOR EDITORIAL AMENDMENT. |
YES |
NA |
|
|
03/01/12 |
BY-LAW
AMENDMENTS – EDITORIAL AMENDMENTS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF A REFERENDUM TO AMEND
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE FACULTY-CHANGE IN VOTING STATUS OF POLICY COMMITTEE
CHAIRS ON THE FACULTY SENATE FROM VOTING TO NON-VOTING, AND MINOR EDITORIAL
AMENDMENTS (FS 11/12-81/SEL). |
YES |
NA |
|
|
03/01/12 |
BY-LAW
AMENDMENT – ARTICLE I, SECTION C—ADDITION OF DUTY TO SERVE AS AN “INTERESTED
PARTY” OF ONE POLICY COMMITTEE TO DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF INDIVIDUAL
SENATORS. |
YES |
NA |
|
|
03/01/12 |
BY-LAW
AMENDMENT-ARTICLE II, SECTION B.2 AND ARTICLE IV. SECTION A.1 (MEMBERS OF THE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE); DELETE REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC POLICY COMMITTEES, BUT
RETAIN VOTING STATUS OF CHAIRS OF “CERTAIN” POLICY COMMITTEES ON THE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. |
YES |
NA |
|
|
03/01/12 |
BY-LAW
AMENDMENT – EDITORIAL CHANGES |
YES |
NA |
|
|
03/01/12 |
STANDING
RULES-2012-2013 POLICY COMMITTEE CHAIR MEMBERSHIP ON THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE |
YES |
NA |
|
|
03/15/2012 |
SEARCH
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT |
YES |
YES |
|
|
03/15/2012 |
COMMITTEE
APOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY |
YES |
YES |
|
|
03/15/2012 |
RESOLUTION
ON SUG FUNDING FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS |
YES |
NA |
|
|
03/15/2012 |
POLICY
ON PROGRAM IMPACTION, RECOMMENDATION TO MAKE PERMANENT |
YES |
YES |
|
|
03/15/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSALS |
YES |
YES |
|
|
03/15/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSAL |
YES
|
YES |
|
|
03/15/2012 |
CAMPUS
SMOKING POLICY, RECOMMENDATION TO REVIEW |
YES |
|
|
|
04/05/2012 |
SCIPP
– ESTABLISHMENT OF AN AUXLIARY WORK GROUP |
YES |
NA |
|
|
04/05/2012 |
ACADEMIC
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC GOALS, ADOPTION OF |
YES |
|
|
|
04/05/2012 |
ACADEMIC
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN, REFERRAL TO AITC TO DEVELOP |
YES |
|
|
|
04/05/2012 |
POLICY
ON GRADUATE LEARNING GOALS/OBJECTIVES, ESTABLISHMENT OF |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/12/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSAL – MA IN HUMANITIES |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/12/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSALS – A&L: MINOR – RUSSIAN, MINOR – CHINESE, MINOR – PORTUGUESE,
MINOR – LATIN, BA PHOTOGRAPHY |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/12/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSALS – ECS: BS CIVIL ENGINEERING, BS ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/12/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSALS – HHS: BS HEALTH SCENCES, MINOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY, KINESIOLOGY:
PRE-THERAPY, KINESIOLOGY: TEACHING OPTION, MAJOR HEATLH SCIENCE, MINOR HEALTH
SCIENCE, MINOR SOCIAL WORK |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/12/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSAL – A&L: ENGLISH MA COMPOSITION EMPHASIS |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/12/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSAL – SSIS: BS WOMEN’S STUDIES |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/12/2012 |
PROGRAM
REVIEW – DEPT OF GOVERNMENT |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/12/2012 |
RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDINGTHE CAMPUS SMOKING POLICY TASK FORCE |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/12/2012 |
ESTABLISHMENT
OFAN AUXLIARY SCIPP WORK GROUP |
YES |
N/A |
|
|
04/26/2012 |
ENROLLMENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR FALL 2012 |
YES |
|
FS #125 duplicated and corrected from FS 11/12-125/APC/EX
to FS 11/12-163/APC/EX |
|
04/26/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSALS – A&L: MA ENGLISH – COMPOSITION CONCENTRATION, CREATIVE WRITING
CONCENTRATION, AND LITERTURE CONCENTRATION |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/26/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSALS – CBA: MBA – GENERAL PROGRAM AND FINANCE CONCENTRATION |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/26/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSAL – HHS: MS PHYSICAL EDUCATION (TEACHING) |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/26/2012 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY: GRADE APPEALS PROCEDURAL APPEALS BOARD |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/26/2012 |
FACULTY
SENATRO REPRESENTING TEMPORARY FACULTY, APPOINTMENT OF |
YES |
|
|
|
04/26/2012 |
ELECTION
OF 2012 COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES |
NA |
NA |
|
|
04/26/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSALS – CBA: MBA – HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONCENTARION, MANAGEMENT
COMPUTER APPLICATINS CONCENTRATION, MARKETING CONCENTRATION, AND URBAN LAND DEVELOPMENT
CONCENTRATION |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/26/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSAL – HHS: MS NURSING, FAMILY NURSE PRACTITI9ONER TRACK AND NURSING
ADMINISTRATION ROLE |
YES |
YES |
|
|
04/26/2012 |
FACULTY
SENATE COMMENDATION FOR PRESIDENT ALEXANDER GONZALEZ |
YES |
N/A |
|
|
05/03/2012 |
FACULTY
CONSULTATION ON THE SELECTION OF ASSOCIATE OR ASSISTANT COLLEGE DEANS POLICY,
REVISION TO |
YES |
N/A |
|
|
05/03/2012 |
SECOND
BACHELOR’S ACADEMIC ACTION CATEGORIES POLICY, ESTABLISHMENT OF |
YES |
YES |
|
|
05/03/2012 |
ACADEMIC
RENEWAL FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS POLICY, ESTABLISHMENT OF |
YES |
YES |
|
|
05/10/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSAL – A&L: DIGITAL MEDIA MINOR |
YES |
YES |
|
|
05/10/2012 |
PROGRAM
PROPOSAL – SSIS: UNDEGRADUATE PSYCHOLOGY MAJOR |
YES |
YES |
|
|
05/10/2012 |
UNIVERSITY
ARTP POLICY, AMENDMENT OF |
YES |
YES |
|
|
05/10/2012 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMNENTS – SENATE: APC, CPC, CODE, ELECTINS, FACULTY ENDOWMENT, FFPC,
GE/GRPC, GSPC, LIVINGSTON LECTURE |
YES |
|
|
|
05/10/2012 |
FACULTY
SENATE COMMENDATION FOR JOSEPH F. SHELEY |
YES |
N/A |
|
|
05/10/2012 |
CREDIT
HOUR DEFINITION POLICY, ESTABLISHMENT OF |
YES |
YES |
|
|
05/10/2012 |
MOTION
TO POSTPONE FS 11/12-144/EX UNTILL THE FIRST MEETING OF FALL SEMESTER 2012 OF
THE FACULTY SENATE – BYLAWS REVISION – CLARIFYINGTHE ELEGIBILITY OF A SENATOR
WHO HAS ALREADY SERVED FIVE YEARS AT THE TIME OF RE-ELECTION |
|
|
|
|
05/10/2012 |
MOTION
TO POSTPONE FS 11/12-148 UNTIL THE FIRST MEETING OF FALL SEMESTER 2012 OF THE
FACULTY SENATE – BYLAW REVISION – TIMING OF ELECTION OF TEMPORARY FACULTY |
|
|
|
|
05/10/2012 |
STANDING
RULES: CREATES THE ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICY COMMITTEE TO REPLACE THEEXISTING
CURRICULUM POLICIES COMMITTEE, GRADUATE STUDIES POLICIES COMMITTEE, AND
GE/GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS POLICIES COMMITTEE; RENAMES THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR
CURRICULUM AS THE COURSE AND PROGRAM PROPOSAL REVIEW DUBCOMMITTEE; AND
CREATES A GRADUATE PROGRAMS SUBCOMMITTEE; ALL TO BE EFFECTIVE IN AY
2013-2014. |
NO
|
|
|
|
05/10/2012 |
STANDING
RULES: MEMBERSHIP AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR ALL APPOINTED STANDING POLICY
COMMITTEES OF THE FACULTY SENATE WHOSE CHAIRS ARE DESIGNATED MEMBERS OF THE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE |
YES |
|
|
|
05/10/2012 |
YEAR-END
REPORT – ACADEMIC POLICY COMMITTEE |
YES |
|
|
|
05/17/2012 |
PROGRAM
REVIEW REPORT – PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY |
YES |
YES |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
YEAR-END
REPORT – FACULTY POLICIES COMMITTEE |
YES |
N/A |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
YEAR-END
REPORT – CURRICULUM POLICIES COMMITTEE |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
YEAR-END
REPORT – GENERAL EDUCATION/GRADUATION REQUIREMETNS POLICIES COMMITTEE |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
YEAR-END
REPORT – GRADUATE STUDIES POLICIES COMMITTEE |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENTS – SENATE: LIVINGSTON LECTURE, ELECTIONS, FACULTY ENDOWMENT, CPC,
GSPC |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENTS – UNIVERSITY: GREADE APPEAL PANELS POOL |
YES |
YES |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
ACADEMIC
CALENDARS, 2013-2014 AND 2014-2015 |
YES |
|
|
|
05/17/2012 |
GRADE
APPEALS POLICY, REVISION TO |
YES |
YES |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
GRADE
APPEALS POLICY, MOTION TO REFER SPECIFIC CONTENT OF FS 11/12-138/APC/EX TO
APC |
YES |
N/A |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
FACULTY
AND STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES |
YES |
YES |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
STANDING
RULES: AMENDS THE MEMBERSHIP AND CHARGE OF THE ACADEMIC POLICIES COMMITTEE;
REMOVES RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACADEMIC CALENDAR FROM THIS COMMITTEE; AND
CREATES A STUDENT RETENTION AND GRADUATION SUBCOMMITTEE; ALL TO BE EFFECTIVE
IN 2012-2013. |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
STANDING
RULES: MEMBERSHIP AND CHARGE OF THE STUDENT RETENTION AND GRADUATION
SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE ACADEMIC POLICIES COMMITTEE, EFFECTIVE AY 2012-2013 |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
STANDING
RULES: AMENDS THE MEMBERSHIP AND CHARGE OF THE FACULTY POLICIES COMMITTEE, TO
BE EFFECTIVE IN AY 2012-2013 |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
POSTPONEMENT
OF FS 11/12-162/FLR: STANDING RULES: STANDING POLICY COMMITTEES WITH
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERSHIP ON THE FACULTY SENATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND THE
FACULTY SENATE |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
MOTION
TO TABLE FS 11/12-105/SEL: STANDINGRULES: MEMBERSHIP AND CHARGE OF THE
GRADUATE PROGRAMS SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICY COMMITTEE,
EFFECTIVE AY 2013-2014 |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
MOTION
TO TABLE FS 11/12-106/SEL: STANDING RULES: FACULTY SENATE COMMITTEE
ORGANIZATINAL CHART, EFFECTIVE AY 2013-2014. |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
MOTION
TO DISCHARGE THE SELECT COMMITTEE 2011-2012 AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
MOTION
TO REFER FS 11/12-140/EX TO THE 2012-2013 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: FIELD TRIP
POLICY, ESTABLISHMENT OF |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
MOTION
TO REFER FS 11/12-141/EX TO THE 2012-2013 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: INTERNSHIP
POLICY, ESTABLISHMENT OF |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
MOTION
TO REFER FS 11/12-114/CPC/EX TO THE 2012-2013 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: PROGRAM
PROPOSAL – MA IN HUMANATIES |
YES |
NA |
|
|
05/17/2012 |
COMMENDATION
FOR ANTHONY G. SHEPPARD |
YES |
NA |
|
PROGRAM PROPOSALS |
A. Business Honors
B. Computer Science Graduate Certificate in Computer Architecture
C. Master of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering
D. Bachelor of Science in Speech Pathology
E. Minor in Philosophy
F. Accelerated Second Bachelor of Science in Nursing Degree Program Collaborative w/CSU, Stanislaus (ASBSNc)
G. B.A. in English
H. Asian Studies – minor
I. Asian Studies - major
Background information can be found at Attachment A.
Carried unanimously.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS – UNIVERSITY |
Institutional Review Board
Gregory Hurtz
Grade Appeal Panels
Jordan Peters
Laurie Kubicek
Search Committee, Chief of Police
Hugh Wilson
University Enterprises, Inc., Board
*Janet Hecsh
*Yan Zhou
*Forwarded with a Faculty Senate endorsement
Carried unanimously.
UARTP POLICY – AMENDMENT OF SECTION 9.04.G |
The Faculty Senate recommends amending Section 9.04.G of the University ARTP Policy as follows:
9.04.G. Departments may authorize electronic submission of student evaluations of teaching performance in classes taught by part-time and full-time temporary faculty. Such authorizations shall be included among the provisions of the Department’s ARTP document governing the periodic evaluation of part-time and full-time temporary faculty. When a Department is considering whether to adopt or amend sucn an authorization the Department may invite the part-time and full-time temporary faculty currently employed to participate in the Department’s decision. The Department’s permanent faculty may prescribe the mode of their participation.
Carried unanimously.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS – UNIVERSITY |
Academic Affairs Budget Advisory Committee
Suzanne O’Keefe, 2014
Anthony J. Leones Scholarship Committee
Adriana Echandia, 2014
Yan Zhou, 2014
Campus Facilities Planning Committee
Matt Schmidtlein, 2014
Honorary Degrees Committee
David Lang, 2013
Instructionally Related Activities Committee
Kristin Kiesel, 2012
Deborah Metzger, 2012
Carried unanimously.
PRESIDENT GONZALEZ’S RESPONSE TO FACULTY SENATE’S POLICY ON INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM PRIORITIES: ACADEMIC PLANNING, RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT, RECEIPT OF |
The Faculty Senate receives President Gonzalez’s July 18, 2011 memorandum responding to FS 10-71 “Policy on Instructional Program Priorities: Academic Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management, Amendment of”.
Carried unanimously.
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS |
Juanita Barrena
Bob Buckley
William Dillon
Mary Kirlin
Tim Marbach
Mary Reddick
The Vice Chair (Janet Hecsh) will serve as convener of this committee.
Carried unanimously.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS – UNIVERSITY |
Institutional Scholarship Committee
Denise Wall Parilo, 2012
Carried unanimously.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS – UNIVERSITY |
Strategic Planning Council
Mary Kirlin, 2013
Intercollegiate Athletic Advisory Committee
Michael Wright, 2014
Carried unanimously.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS – SENATE |
Academic Policies Committee
Jacqueline Irwin, At-large, 2014
Faculty Policies Committee
Sue Holl, At-large, 2013
Carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION ON CSU PRESIDENT SEARCHES |
Resolved: That the Faculty Senate at California State University, Sacramento urges the CSU Board of Trustees to continue the past presidential search policy and current practice of having on-campus visits for finalists as a part of the selection process for new Presidents, and be it further,
Resolved: That this resolution be distributed to Chancellor Reed, the CSU Board of Trustees via Chair Carter, and to Academic Senate of the California State University via Chair James Postma.
Rationale: The Board of Trustees is currently considering changes to the current policy on presidential compensation and hiring policies. Historically, presidential candidates have visited the campus for which they were candidates and have held targeted meetings with administrators, faculty and staff and also held open forums for the campus community.
The loss of campus visits provided for in the proposed policy changes would greatly diminish the role of the campus community in the presidential search process and would eliminate the ability of candidates to meet all members of the campus community, including administrators, faculty, staff, students and community members, thereby understanding the issues and challenges they might face in the role.
Campus presidents are presented with a wide variety of difficult challenges, and clearly the California State University should take advantage of any opportunity to allow new presidents to build support in their respective communities. Arriving on campus without having the support and legitimacy provided by such a process would put the chosen candidate at a significant disadvantage in building a successful transition.
Carried unanimously.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS – SENATE |
Faculty Endowment for Student Scholarships
Rodney McCurdy, 2014
Carried unanimously.
EARLY START IMPLEMENTATION ADVISORY GROUP |
The Faculty Senate creates an advisory group to the Provost for implementation of Executive Order 1048 “Early Start”.
Membership:
Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies Sheree Meyer
Associate VP for Student Academic Success Marcellene Watson-Derbigny
Director, Early Assessment Program Joy Salvetti
Writing Programs Coordinator, English Amy Heckathorn
Reading and Writing Across the Curriculum Coordinator Dan Melzer
Assistant Director/Coordinator, Student Orientation Mary Shepherd
Learning Skills Math Coordinator, Math Representative Ravin Pan
Teacher Education, Early Assessment & HS English (ERWC) Marcy Merrill
Carried unanimously.
WASC EdD INTERIM REPORT COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT |
Chair of the Graduate Studies Policies Committee or designee
Carried unanimously.
PROGRAM IMPACTION FOR 2012-13, SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA – CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
The Faculty Senate endorses the supplemental admissions criteria to be used by the Division of Criminal Justice during the 2012-2013 admissions cycle, contingent upon the Division of Criminal Justice presenting a viable plan to the Provost for implementation of those criteria, including the criteria pertaining to first generation college status, socioeconomic factors, or historically disadvantaged status. If such a plan does not include viable implementation of those specific criteria, the Faculty Senate endorsement is restricted to the other, objective supplemental criteria (those pertaining to academic standing, units, pre-requisite grades, and GPA) only.
Eligibility for admission to the Criminal Justice major is based on academic achievement. Before admission to the major, all applicants must meet the requirements described below:
a. Overall GPA of 2.6 or higher
b. Completion of 45 units
c. Completion of the following courses:
Criminal Justice courses completed with a grade of “C” or better:
CRJ 1, Introduction to Criminal Justice
CRJ 2, Law of Crimes
CRJ 4, General Investigative Techniques
CRJ 5, The Community and the Justice System
Applicants will be rank ordered based on their overall GPA and the department will admit as many students as there are slots available. For a small percentage of applicants, eligibility may be weighed alongside other criteria such as: first generation college status, socioeconomic factors or historically disadvantaged status. These supplemental criteria were developed and approved by the Division of Criminal Justice faculty at large on December 10, 2010 and are endorsed by the Chair, Dean and the Provost.
Carried.
PROGRAM IMPACTION FOR 2012-13, SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA – HEALTH SCIENCE PROGRAM |
The Faculty Senate endorses the supplemental admissions criteria to be used by the Health Science Program during the 2012-2013 admissions cycle, contingent upon the Health Science Program presenting a viable plan to the Provost for implementation of those criteria, including the criteria pertaining to first generation college status, socioeconomic factors, or historically disadvantaged status. If such a plan does not include viable implementation of those specific criteria, the Faculty Senate endorsement is restricted to the other, objective supplemental criteria (those pertaining to academic standing, units, pre-requisite grades, and GPA) only.
To be considered for admission to the Health Science program, all applicants must meet the following requirements:
(1) a 2.0 minimum GPA in overall Sacramento State units (for continuing Sacramento State students) or overall transfer units (for transfer students), and
(2) the completion of 45 units, and
(3) a course grade of C or above in all required pre-requisite Health Science major courses including BIO 25, BIO 26, CHEM 6A, PSYC 2, HLSC 50, and STAT 1 or the equivalents.
(4) HLSC 98, ProSeminar, can be taken prior or as a co-requisite to all required upper division HLSC courses, except for those HLSC courses that are designated as a GE offering.
All pre-requisite health major requirements must be completed prior to admission into the BS program. Eligible applicants will be admitted for available spaces within a specified concentration based on overall GPA rank ordering of such applicants. For a small percentage of applicants, eligibility may be weighed alongside other criteria such as: first generation college status, socioeconomic factors or historically disadvantage status.
Carried.
PROGRAM IMPACTION FOR 2012-13, SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA – PSYCHOLOGY |
The Faculty Senate endorses the supplemental admissions criteria to be used by the Psychology Dept during the 2012-2013 admissions cycle, contingent upon:
1) the Psychology Dept presenting a viable plan to the Provost for implementation of those criteria, including the criteria pertaining to first generation college status, socioeconomic factors, or historically disadvantaged status. If such a plan does not include viable implementation of those specific criteria, the Faculty Senate endorsement is restricted to the other, objective supplemental criteria (those pertaining to academic standing, units, pre-requisite grades, and GPA) only.
2) Removal of the prohibition to apply to the program twice.
· New and returning students must meet the CSU admission requirements and must be in good academic standing.
· Students must complete PSYC 2 (Introductory Psychology; 3 semester units) and PSYC 8 (Methods of Research; 3 semester units) or their articulated equivalents with a grade of “C” or higher in each course within 2 attempts.
· Students must have completed at least 30 semester units.
· Students must have a minimum overall GPA of 2.3.
· Students may apply to the major twice.
· For a small percentage of applicants, eligibility may be weighed alongside other criteria such as: first generation college status, socioeconomic factors or historically disadvantaged status.
Admission of majors to the Psychology program will be based on a rank ordering of eligible applicants according to their overall GPA. Applicants will be accepted for available spaces up to the departmental capacity.
Carried.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS – SENATE |
Senate Select Committee
Elizabeth Strasser
Carried unanimously.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS – UNIVERSITY |
University Committee for Persons with Disabilities
Frank Lilly, 2012
Carried unanimously.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS – SENATE |
Center for Teaching and Learning Advisory Board
Eun Mi Cho, 2014
Ann Moylan, 2014
Milica Markovic, 2014
Mridula Udayagiri, 2014
Research and Creative Activities Subcommittee
Heather Diaz, at-large, 2012
Graduate Studies Policies Committee
Julian Heather, At-large, 2012*
*one year replacement
Carried unanimously.
GENERAL EDUCATION PERIODIC SYLLABI REVIEW PROCESS, POSTPONEMENT OF |
The Faculty Senate recommends postponing the General Education periodic syllabi review process for one year for the purpose of revising the GE Area Learning Outcomes and incorporating those Learning Outcomes into Area syllabi. The review cycle would resume in sequence starting in Fall 2012 with Area B.
The new syllabi review sequence:
Area B 2012-2013
Area C 2013-2014
Area D 2014-2015
Area E 2015-2016
Area A 2016-2017 (Area A was reviewed in 2010-2011)
Carried unanimously.
PRESIDENT GONZALEZ’S RESPONSE TO FACULTY SENATE’S RECOMMENDED POLICY ON INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM PRIORITIES: ACADEMIC PLANNING, RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT, ENDORSEMENT OF |
The Faculty Senate endorses the changes to FS 10-71 “Policy on Instructional Program Priorities: Academic Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management, Amendment of” as proposed by President Gonzalez in his memorandum of July 18, 2011 and in the accompanying attachments, furthermore, the Faculty Senate recommends changes to the proposed Policy as delineated in FS 11/12-14. The Faculty Senate further recommends that the Select Committee be established as soon as possible after adoption of the Policy, and without the need for data to have been gathered prior to establishment of the Committee (as was originally recommended).
Carried unanimously.
ACADEMIC PLANNING, RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT, AMENDMENT OF |
The Faculty Senate amends the proposed policy on Academic Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management as follows:
Amendment Regarding the Selection Process and Membership of the Committee Charged with Making Recommendations for the Academic Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management Ranking in Accordance with the Criteria Specified in the Policy
The Issues (in order of importance):
1. There is a need to seek expertise outside of the Senate membership.
2. There is a need for the Academic Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management to maintain a strong relationship to the Senate.
3. There is a need to encourage university-wide rather than college-based perspective.
4. There is a need for inclusion of members from each of the colleges for information purposes.
The Faculty Senate amends the policy on Academic Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management as follows:
Membership of the committee shall consist of:
· Up to seven tenured/tenure-track faculty members from the college-based pool of nominations. No more than one from each College.
· Up to two tenured/tenure-track electing unit Senate representatives appointed from the pool of senate nominees. The two senate appointees shall not be from the same College.
Process for selecting committee membership
Nominations for College-Based Seats
The Senate invites nominations college-based seats. Nominations may be made by self-nominations, by Academic Council or equivalent body of the College or by other members of the faculty. The College, however, cannot revise the nomination process as stated.
Nominations for Senate-Based Seats
The Senate invites nominations from the electing unit representatives of Senate membership to fill two Senate seats. Nominations may be made by self-nomination or by other members of the Faculty Senate. Elections for these seats will follow the elections for college-based seats.
Nominee Statements
Each nominee shall submit for Senate consideration a brief statement regarding his/her interests and qualifications to serve as members of the committee. Nominations along with candidate statements shall be presented to the Senate. Statements shall not exceed one-page.
Committee Appointments
The Senate may appoint no more than one faculty member from each of the colleges in the college-based pool of nominations. In addition, the Senate may appoint no more than two tenure/tenure-track electing unit Senate representatives from the Senate pool of nominations. The two Senate appointees shall not be from the same College.
Carried unanimously.
UNIVERSITY BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE, CHANGE IN TERM OF OFFICE |
The Faculty Senate endorses the changes to the term of office for members of the University Budget Advisory Committee as outlined in Attachment A.
Carried unanimously.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY |
Committee on Administrative Review
David Leon, 2014
Carried unanimously.
AD HOC COMMITTEE ON FACULTY RESPONSIBILITIES TO STUDENTS IN THE INSTRUCTIONAL ENVIRONMENT, THANKS AND COMMENDATION |
The Faculty Senate thanks and commends the ad hoc committee on Faculty Responsibilities to Students in the Instructional Environment:
Joseph Sheley, Provost and Vice President, Academic Affairs
David Wagner, Vice President, Human Resources
Bob Buckley, Computer Science
Janet Hecsh, Teacher Education
Ramneet Kaur Johl, Associated Students, Inc.
Christine Miller, Communication Studies
Jana Noel, Teacher Education
Reza Peigahi, Library
Carried unanimously.
REGISTRATION UNIT LIMITS |
The Faculty Senate recommends the following early registration unit limits be effective spring 2012 and onward:
· New and continuing undergraduate students in good academic standing may register for up to 15 units.
· Seniors who have applied to graduate may register for up to 21 units.
· Undergraduate students who are not in good academic standing are limited to the number of units allowed by their individual academic contract or a maximum of 14 units if they are on academic probation (or continued probation).
· Graduate students in good academic standing are allowed to enroll in a maximum of 9 units unless they fall into an exception category as outlined below.
· Graduate students who are not in good academic standing are limited to the number of units allowed by their individual academic contract, or a maximum of 9 units if they are on academic probation (or continued probation).
Special Program Requirements:
Exceptions due to special program requirements should be coordinated between the academic department and the Registrar’s Office. Exceptions due to special requirements in graduate programs should be coordinated between the Office of Graduate Studies before sending information to the Registrar’s Office.
Other Exceptions:
Individual students with special circumstances who wish to increase their early registration unit load should file an “Excess Units Petition” with the Registrar’s Office. Students who can demonstrate that they can graduate within the next two semesters are encouraged to file an “Excess Units Petition,” if they would like to balance their remaining units over the next two semesters.
Background:
At this very time last year, campus officials were examining the continuing student registration process with great scrutiny. They knew then that the campus’ newly reduced targets would make it difficult for mid-cycle and late-cycle registrants to have any chance at building a viable course schedule. Faced with these uncertainties, campus officials are suggesting that specific early registration unit load limits be put in place as a long-term policy.
Data on the average unit loads for undergraduate and graduate students are given below. The figures are broken down based on the average units students were enrolled in at the end of the early registration period and on the University census date for each semester.
Average unit load (Fall 2007-Fall 2011) |
||||
|
Undergraduate |
Graduate |
||
|
Early registration |
Census date |
Early registration |
Census date |
Fall 2007 |
12.3 |
12.4 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
Spring 2008 |
12.2 |
12.1 |
8.1 |
8.4 |
Fall 2008 |
12.5 |
12.4 |
8.4 |
8.4 |
Spring 2009 |
12.3 |
12.8 |
8.5 |
8.3 |
Fall 2009 |
12.3 |
12.7 |
8.6 |
8.4 |
Spring 2010 |
12.6 |
12.7 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
†Fall 2010 |
11.6 |
12.3 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
Spring 2011 |
12.2 |
12.6 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
‡Fall 2011 |
12.3 |
12.7* |
8.0 |
8.6* |
*As of 9/21/2011. Census date is 9/26/2011 †Fall 2010 early registration unit limits: Undergraduate = 14 units. Graduate = 9 units. ‡Fall 2011 early registration unit limits: Undergraduate = 15 units. Graduate = 12 units.
|
Recommendation:
Student Affairs and Academic Affairs recommend the ongoing use of restricted unit loads during the early registration period. It is expected that unit load restrictions will be lifted during the late registration and the drop/add period.
Unit Limits During Open/Late Registration and Drop/Add Periods
Consistent with existing policy, during “Open/Late Registration” undergraduate students may register for up to 21 units unless they are subject to an academic contract limiting them to fewer units. Graduate students would continue to be limited to 12 units unless they fall into an exception category as outlined in the policy above.
Rationale
Based on feedback from students, faculty and staff, the divisions of Student Affairs, Academic Affairs, and Academic Policies Committee recommend the long-term imposition of early registration unit load restrictions for continuing undergraduate students the following reasons:
1.
Early registration unit load limits increase access to courses for a broader
set of students.
Since students register based on matriculation status (continuing versus
transfer), class level (first year, sophomore, senior, classified graduate,
etc.)
2.
The adoption of a long-term policy of limits on early registration allows
students and advisors to develop course plans more effectively.
The current policy is effective only for the fall 2011 registration
cycle. Frequent changes to the number of units students may register for
during early registration on a semester or annual basis make it more difficult
for students to develop a course plan for timely graduation.
3.
The 15-unit early registration limit permits students to register for a
full-time course load for the purposes of financial aid.
Undergraduate students must be registered for 12 units or more in order to
be eligible for financial aid as a full-time student.
4.
The 15-unit early registration limit allows students enrolling in
higher-unit courses to achieve a full-time course load (12 units) during early
registration.
A lower early registration cap might create difficulties for students enrolling
in higher-unit courses offered in disciplines such as foreign language,
science, and mathematics.
Background: The transmittal from Kristin Van Gaasbeck, Chair, Academic Policies Committee, is attached as Attachment B.
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY |
Committee on Diversity Awards
Yvette Farmer, 2014
Michele Foss Snowden, 2014
Carried
unanimously.
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – SENATE |
Pedagogy Enhancement Awards Subcommittee
Claudia Lucero, NSM, 2014
Curriculum Policies Committee
Dian Baker, At-large, 2012
Carried
unanimously.
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY |
IRT Academic Advisory Committee
Elizabeth Liles, 2012
Todd Migliaccio, 2012
Bruce Ostertag, 2012
IRT Administrative Advisory Committee
Ron Coleman, 2012
Carried
unanimously.
COMMENDATION FOR CHERYL
JOHNSON |
WHEREAS: Cheryl Johnson has provided over ten years of extraordinary
service to the CSUS Faculty Senate as she facilitated the smooth running of
Senate office; and
WHEREAS: During her
tenure with the Faculty Senate, Cheryl Johnson has orchestrated her work in concert with Carolyn Duran, Bonnie Smith
and Lana Sysa, who are quick to sing, in harmony, the praises of Cheryl’s
organizational skills, her inclusive approach to teamwork, and her kindness and
support as the Senate office has hummed merrily along, distinguishing it as a
model of efficiency and smooth operations; and
WHEREAS: Cheryl Johnson has long kept an enormous blue exercise ball in the
Faculty Senate office, which may help explain her unflappable demeanor; and
WHEREAS: Cheryl Johnson has supported faculty governance activities at CSUS
by facilitating Senate meetings that most assuredly could not have run without
her, by coordinating Executive Committee and Faculty Senate agendas, by
preparing and distributing written materials, and by managing the Senate
budget; and
WHEREAS: Cheryl Johnson has had to sit through meetings of the Faculty
Senate and its Executive Committee not just once, but twice, as she listens to
recordings and constructs the official minutes of these groups; and
WHEREAS: Cheryl Johnson has exhibited the unique skills and requisite sense
of humor needed to interpret and document Executive Committee discussions
bearing no resemblance to any listed agenda item; and
WHEREAS: Cheryl Johnson has used her prodigious institutional memory to
provide continuity for Executive Committee discussions that had little inherent
continuity; and
WHEREAS: Cheryl Johnson survived the tenure of five Faculty Senate Chairs
with no documented psychiatric counseling; and
WHEREAS: Past and current Chairs of the Senate readily acknowledge that
they could not have functioned without Cheryl Johnson’s mentoring, support, and
intimate knowledge of the Senate and Academic Affairs ; and
WHEREAS: Cheryl Johnson has
ably assisted Senate leadership as the "power" behind the
"power", in handling all matters dealing with protocol and
procedures, and in helping keep Senate Chairs from making grievous errors; and
WHEREAS: Cheryl Johnson has called the roll for 289 different and unique
Senators, some with quite challenging surnames to pronounce; and
WHEREAS: Faculty Senators
and countless other faculty serving on Senate and university committees over
the years are deeply grateful to Cheryl Johnson for her always gracious
camaraderie and helpful assistance in learning about Senate and committee
meeting schedules, mysterious acronyms, and so much more; and
WHEREAS: Cheryl Johnson will be sorely missed by the Faculty Senate Chair,
her colleagues in the Senate Office, and each Faculty Senator; be it therefore
RESOLVED: That
the California State University, Sacramento Faculty Senate warmly thanks and
expresses its deep gratitude to Cheryl Johnson for her many years of
extraordinary service to the Senate; and be it further
RESOLVED: That Faculty Senate wishes Cheryl Johnson all the best as she takes
her exercise ball and bounces toward new adventures in the Office of the
Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, and extends to her an open
invitation to return and visit us whenever those adventures allow.
Carried unanimously.
KEN O’DONNELL, STATE
UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AND POLICY – report on the CSU
Graduation Initiative
OUTSTANDING
SCHOLARLY AND CREATIVE ACTIVITY AWARDS, AMENDMENT OF |
Amends FS 09-70
The
Faculty Senate amends the Outstanding Scholarly and Creative Activity Awards by
including the following criteria:
In addition to the CV and the nomination letter,
applications should highlight the nominee’s most significant scholarship or creative
activities, including
·
impact
of the scholarly and creative activities on nominee’s field(s) of study,
including key citations or unique contributions;
·
impact
of the scholarly and creative activities on the university and students;
·
additional
criteria may be established by each college.
Background
information and the transmittal from the Faculty Policies Committee can be
found at Attachment A.
Carried
unanimously.
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – SENATE |
Curriculum Policies Committee
Dian Baker, At-large, 2012
Carried
unanimously.
Carried
unanimously.
NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF
CHAIR, CURRICULUM POLICIES COMMITTEE |
Background: Article II,
Section F of the By-laws of the Faculty Senate state, in part, “ . . . A
vacancy in the voting membership of the Executive Committee shall be filled by
nomination and election at the first meeting of the Faculty Senate after the
vacancy occurs. The nominee elected shall have received more votes than any
candidate not elected. . . If the office of Chair of a Standing Committee
becomes vacant, the office shall be executed by the Vice Chair of the Standing
Committee until the Faculty Senate shall elect a successor as provided in
Article II, Sections D.3 and E.3 of these By-laws (http://www.csus.edu/acse/bylaws.htm).
The Vice Chair executing the office of Chair under this provision shall not
serve as a voting member of the Executive Committee.” Kath Pinch will resign as
Chair of the Curriculum Policies Committee, as she will be on sabbatical in
Spring 2012.
Nominations of candidates for
Chair of each Standing Committees may be made by a senator from the floor; by
the current membership of the Standing Committee; or by a petition signed by
ten (10) or more full-time faculty members and filed with the Faculty Senate
office before the first meeting of the new Faculty Senate.
The candidates for Chair of
each Standing Committees shall submit a one page description of qualifications
and intentions to the Faculty Senate office for inclusion with the agenda for
the election meeting.
Candidate for office of Chair
of the Curriculum Policies Committee, effective Spring 2012: Dan Melzer
(Curriculum Policies recommendation)
Carried.
FS
11/12-43A/Flr SENATE COMMITTEE ON INSTRUCTIONAL
PROGRAM PRIORITIES, POSTPONEMENT OF
The Faculty Senate postpones the election until such time as
the nomination period has been re-opened for a period of seven working
days.
Carried.
FS
11/12-31A/Flr. REFERRAL OF FACULTY RESPONSIBILITIES TO STUDENTS IN THE
INSTRUCTIONAL ENVIRONMENT BACK TO FACULTY POLICIES COMMITTEE
The Faculty Senate refers the proposal back to FPC with a
request that FPC synthesize all existing and proposed policies relating to
faculty rights, responsibilities, and ethics into a single policy
proposal.
Carried.
FS
11/12-31B/Flr. RESOLUTION ON AN INTERIM POLICY TO FACULTY RESPONSIBILITIES TO
STUDENTS IN THE INSTRUCTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
The Faculty Senate recommends that no action be taken to
impose an interim policy pertaining to the content of the item previously
entitled Faculty Responsibilities to Students in the Instructional Environment
until such time as the Faculty Senate has recommended such a policy
proposal.
Carried.
SENATE
COMMITTEE ON INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM PRIORITIES, ELECTION OF |
The following were nominated:
COLLEGE-BASED NOMINEES
COLLEGE |
NOMINEE |
DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM |
NOMINATION SOURCE |
Arts
and Letters |
Jackie
Donath |
Humanities
and Religious Studies |
other
than self or Academic Council |
Business
Administration |
Jai
Joon Lee |
Management |
other
than self or Academic Council |
Education |
Jana
Noel |
Teacher
Education |
self-nominated |
Engineering
and Computer Science |
Sue
Holl |
Mechanical
Engineering |
Academic
Council |
|
Anne-Louise
Radimsky |
Computer
Science |
other
than self or Academic Council |
Health
and Human Services |
Tanya
Altmann |
Nursing |
other
than self or Academic Council |
|
Sue
Escobar |
Criminal
Justice |
self-nominated |
|
Michael
Wright |
Kinesiology
and Health Science |
other
than self or Academic Council |
Natural
Sciences and Mathematics |
Susan
Crawford |
Chemistry |
Academic
Council |
|
Shannon
Datwyler |
Biological
Sciences |
self-nominated |
|
Chris
Taylor |
Physics
and Astronomy |
other
than self or Academic Council |
Social
Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies |
Marya
Endriga |
Psychology |
self-nominated |
|
Raghuraman
S. Trichur |
Anthropology |
self-nominated |
SENATE-BASED NOMINEES
COLLEGE |
NOMINEE |
DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM |
Arts
and Letters |
Carolyn
Gibbs |
Design |
Natural
Sciences & Math |
Chris
Taylor |
Physics
and Astronomy |
The following were elected:
College Based Seats:
Tanya
Altmann
Susan
Crawford
Jackie
Donath
Marya
Endriga
Sue
Holl
Jai
Joon Lee
Jana
Noel
Senate Based Seats:
Carolyn
Gibbs
Chris
Taylor
Carried
REFERRAL
TO APC, OF STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES, REVISIONS TO |
The Faculty Senate refers the proposal back to APC and FPC
with a request that APC and FPC reconcile all proposed policies relating to
student rights and responsibilities, as well as faculty rights,
responsibilities, and ethics.
Carried
unanimously
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT – SENATE |
Faculty Policies Committee
Rodney McCurdy, At-large, 2013
Carried unanimously
FS 11/12-49/GSPC/Ex SECOND BACHELOR’S POLICY, REVISIONS TO
The Faculty Senate recommends revising the “Second Bachelor’s Policy” as proposed in Attachment A.
Carried unanimously
COMMENDATION FOR DAVID WAGNER |
|
||
WHEREAS: David
Wagner has served this institution with distinction for thirty-six years,
beginning as a lowly debate coach and ascending to the lofty heights of
administrative leadership as Vice President for Human Resources, with stops
along the way as Department Chair, Associate Dean, and Dean, while never
forgetting his humble beginnings as a faculty colleague; and
WHEREAS: Beginning
as a faculty member in Communication Studies, David Wagner enveloped himself numerous times in bed
sheets simulating a toga in order to impart the lessons of Cicero to
Communication Studies students; and
WHEREAS: David
Wagner’s fond memories of being able to control his environment from his infant
highchair led him to assume the seat of High Chair as Chair of the Chairs of
the School of Arts and Sciences, over whom he had no control whatsoever; and
WHEREAS: When
David Wagner went on to become Associate Dean for the School of Arts and
Sciences, in that capacity he approved a requisition for the Department of
Communication Studies to purchase a scum sucker—this is a true story! and
WHEREAS: For someone whose discipline is Communication Studies, it is quite ironic that David Wagner has always been very cautious about divulging information until it is absolutely necessary to keep others from doing something totally stupid; and
WHEREAS: David Wagner’s aversion to technology is undoubtedly overstated, since it is not true that he thinks an iPad is something to sit on; and
WHEREAS: David Wagner has perfected the ability to follow Senate arguments while apparently sleeping in the back of the room; and
WHEREAS: When he is roused from slumber, David Wagner always has the ability to cut to the core of any issue; and
WHEREAS: Although
David Wagner is not particularly noted for the neatness of his handwriting or
the neatness of his office, he is distinguished by the neatness of his logic;
and
WHEREAS: The Senate does not blame David Wagner for the PSSIs and the FMIs; and
WHEREAS: Under David Wagner’s tutelage, faculty and staff are now experts in sexual harassment; be it therefore
RESOLVED: That the California State University, Sacramento Faculty Senate warmly thanks David Wagner for the memories, especially the legendary asbestos training; and be it further
RESOLVED: That a more collegial administrator we could never hope to find, as reflected in his willingness to partner with the faculty to navigate a vast array of state and federal laws, legal mandates, executive orders, and other policy initiatives coming from high and low places over the years; and be it further
RESOLVED: That while David Wagner will be replaced, he is in so many ways irreplaceable; and be it further
RESOLVED: That the Faculty Senate wishes David Wagner all the best as he boards the next train heading toward new adventures in retirement, and extends to him an open invitation to return and visit us whenever he needs a nap.
Carried unanimously
AREA B LEARNING OUTCOMES, REVISIONS TO |
The Faculty Senate recommends revising the “General Education Area B Learning Outcomes” as follows:
Proposed
GE Area B Learning Outcomes
Scientifically and mathematically literate individuals understand the characteristic features of science and mathematics as forms of human knowledge and inquiry, and they are aware of how science and mathematics shape their material, intellectual, and cultural environments1. Scientifically and mathematically literate individuals are willing to engage in science- and math-related issues and ideas as reflective citizens and they are able to draw evidence-based conclusions and make reasoned decisions concerning science- and math-related issues in real-life contexts.
Scientific and mathematical
literacy includes both an individual’s knowledge of scientific and mathematical
concepts and principles as well as the use of that knowledge to acquire new
knowledge, to identify questions, and to explain scientific and mathematical
phenomena. Achieving scientific and mathematical literacy
is a life-long process that requires the development of skills, confidence and
the desire to apply what has been learned to new areas and issues as they arise
in the individual’s life.
1The definition of scientific literacy is based on: PISA 2003
Assessment Framework - Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving
Knowledge and Skills (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development).
Drawing upon one or more of the physical sciences, students will be able to:
· Explain and apply core ideas and models concerning physical systems and mechanisms, citing critical observations, underlying assumptions and limitations.
· Describe how scientists create explanations of natural phenomena based on the systematic collection of empirical evidence subjected to rigorous testing and/or experimentation.
· Access and evaluate scientific information, including interpreting tables, graphs and equations.
· Recognize evidence-based conclusions and form reasoned opinions about science-related matters of personal, public and ethical concern.
Drawing upon one or more of the life sciences, students will be able to:
· Explain and apply core ideas and models concerning living systems and life forms, citing critical observations, underlying assumptions and limitations.
· Describe how scientists create explanations of natural phenomena based on the systematic collection of empirical evidence subjected to rigorous testing and/or experimentation.
· Access and evaluate scientific information, including interpreting tables, graphs and equations.
· Recognize evidence-based conclusions and form reasoned opinions about science-related matters of personal, public and ethical concern.
· Students will be able to use their senses and scientific instruments to gather, organize, and display empirical data.
· Students will be able to identify patterns in data and use these to hypothesize underlying relationships.
· Students will be able to explain and apply scientific techniques for coping with complexity and variability in the natural world.
· Students will be able to solve problems by thinking logically, making conjectures, and constructing valid mathematical arguments.
· Students will be able to make valid inferences from numerical, graphical and symbolic information.
· Students will be able to apply mathematical reasoning to both abstract and applied problems, and to both scientific and non-scientific problems.
Area B-5: Further Studies
Students will be able to do one or more of the following:
· Cite critical observations, underlying assumptions and limitations to explain and apply important ideas and models in one or more of the following: physical science, life science, mathematics or computer science.
· Recognize evidence-based conclusions and form reasoned opinions about science-related matters of personal, public and ethical concern.
· Discuss historical or philosophical perspectives pertaining to the practice of science or mathematics.
Note: The side-by-side comparison can be found in Attachment B-1.
BACKGROUND:
In November 2009 new Baccalaureate Learning Goals (BaLGs),
aligned with EO 1033, were passed by the Faculty Senate (http://www.csus.edu/acse/09-10_actions.htm#FS%2009-74). In Spring 2011
the process of revising Area Learning Outcomes (ALOs) to align with the new BaLGs
began with Area B: The Physical Universe and its Life Forms.
Faculty who taught in Area B along with the Dean of Natural
Sciences and Mathematics, the Dean of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary
Studies, the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies, and the Chair of the
GE/GRPC convened and worked throughout Spring 2011 on revising Area B Learning
Outcomes. This work concluded with the attached draft Area Learning Outcomes
dated September 19, 2011. These ALOs were circulated to Deans and departments
for comment and endorsed by Area B stakeholders.
On October 31, 2011, the General Education/Graduation Requirements Policy
Committee reviewed the revised Area B Learning Outcomes. After discussion with
the Area B faculty representative and deliberation, the committee voted
unanimously to refer them to the Executive Committee and thereafter to the
Faculty Senate for their endorsement. The GE/GRPC
acknowledges the work of those involved with the Area B process, especially the
Area B working group, for their collegial and consultative efforts in arriving
at new Area B Learning Outcomes.
Carried unanimously
FS 11/12-46A/Flr AREA B LEARNING OUTCOMES, REFERRED BACK TO GE/GRPC TO CLEAN UP CRITERIA LANGUAGE (does not affect FS 11/12-46/GE/GRPC/ Ex)
The Faculty Senate refers the GE
Area B criteria to GE/GRPC to resolve any conflict with the newly recommended
learning outcome language.
Carried unanimously
FS 11/12-56/Flr SENATE FALL SCHEDULE, REVISIONS TO
The Faculty
Senate adjourns until Spring 2012.
Carried
FS11/12-57/CPC/Ex PROGRAM PROPOSALS
The Faculty
Senate recommends approval of the following change proposals:
A. Undergraduate Spanish Major (deletion of minor
requirement) Attachment A-1
B. Undergraduate Spanish Major (minimum grade requirement) Attachment A-2
C. Undergraduate Spanish Minor (minimum grade requirement) Attachment A-3
FS11/12-58/CPC/Ex PROGRAM PROPOSALS
The Faculty Senate recommends
approval of the following Program Proposals:
A. HRS/HUM Minor Attachment B-1
B. HRS/HUM Concentration Attachment B-2
C. HRS/RS Minor Attachment B-4
D. HRS/RS Concentration Attachment B-3
FS11/12-59/CPC/Ex PROGRAM PROPOSAL
The Faculty Senate recommends
approval of the following Program Proposal:
A.
Moderate/Severe
Education Specialist: Autism Spectrum Disorder Added Authorization Attachment G
FS 11/12-60/CPC/Ex PROGRAM PROPOSAL
The Faculty
Senate recommends approval of the following Program Proposal:
A.
BS in Computer
Science Major Attachment H
FS 11/12-61/CPC/Ex PROGRAM PROPOSAL
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following
Program Proposal:
A.
Construction
Management Undergraduate Degree Attachment I
INTERIM POLICY ON PROGRAM IMPACTION |
The Faculty Senate recommends immediate adoption of the following
policy, to be in place until the end of AY2011-2012 and to be applied only to
those programs requesting impacted status for the first time. Attachment J
FS 11/12-63/CPC/Ex PROGRAM REVIEW- COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
The Faculty Senate recommends that the two master’s programs
(Computer Science and Software Engineering) and the Certificates of Advanced
Study in the Computer Science Program at the Department of Computer Sciences be
approved for six years or until the next scheduled program review.
Carried
unanimously.
FS
11/12-64/CPC/Ex PROGRAM
REVIEW- ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING
The Faculty Senate recommends that the two master’s programs
(Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Engineering) at the
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering be approved for six years
or until the next scheduled program review.
Carried
unanimously.
FS
11/12-65/CPC/Ex PROGRAM
REVIEW- MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
The Faculty Senate recommends that the master’s program in
Mechanical Engineering be approved for six years or until the next scheduled
program review with an interim report due to Academic Affairs in March 2014
that satisfies both University and WASC requirements and provides appropriate
data for the three questions in their focused inquiry.
Carried
unanimously.
FS
11/12-66/CPC/Ex PROGRAM
REVIEW- CIVIL ENGINEERING
The Faculty Senate recommends that the master’s program in
Civil Engineering be approved for six years or until the next scheduled program
review with an interim report due to Academic Affairs in March 2014 that 1)
satisfies both University and WASC requirements, 2) provides appropriate data
for the three questions in their focused inquiry, and 3) includes a workable
and fully implemented graduate assessment plan.
Carried
unanimously.
See Attachment K for
FS 11/12-63/CPC/Ex through FS 11-12-66/CPC/Ex
FS
11/12-67/CPC/Ex
PROGRAM PROPOSAL MA PROGRAM – TESOL
The Faculty Senate recommends the approval of the MA Program
in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Attachment L
Carried
unanimously.
FS 11/12-68/Ex. SELECT
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT UNIVERSITY
Select Advisory Committee for
the Vice President of Administration and
Chief Financial Officer
Eric Lin, Finance, CBA
Matthew Hoag, Accounting and
Information Systems, CBA
Carried
unanimously.
FS 11/12-69/CPC/Ex PROGRAM REVIEW – DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN’S STUDIES
The Faculty Senate recommends that the Women’s Studies
program be approved for six years or until the next program review.
Carried
unanimously.
FS 11/12-70/CPC/Ex PROGRAM REVIEW – GERONTOLOGY PROGRAM
The Faculty Senate recommends that the Gerontology program be
approved for six years or until the next program review.
Carried
unanimously.
FS 11/12-71/CPC/Ex PROGRAM REVIEW – ASIAN STUDIES PROGAM
The Faculty Senate recommends that the Asian Studies program
be approved for six years or until the next program review.
Carried
unanimously.
See
Attachment M for FS
11/12-60/CPC/Ex through FS 11/12-71/CPC/Ex.
FS 11/12-74/Ex. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT –
UNIVERSITY
Campus
Safety and Environmental Health Committee
Jennie
Singer, 2014
Carried
unanimously.
CPC/Ex PROGRAM REVIEW- GEOLOGY
The Faculty Senate recommends that all degree programs and minors in the Department of Geology be approved for six years from the date of Senate approval. Attachment A
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-76/Ex COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT – SENATE
General
Education/Graduation Requirements Policies Committee
Sue Holl, Spring Semester 2012
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-77/Ex COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY
ASI
Appellate Council
Sylvester Bowie, 2013
Carried unanimously.
SCIPP/Ex POLICY ON INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM PRIORITIES: ACADEMIC PLANNING, RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT, AMENDMENT OF
The Faculty Senate recommends the following change to the quartile grouping as outlined in Section V of the Policy on Instructional Program Priorities: Academic Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management:
The process of making recommendations for academic prioritization shall result in four separate groupings-undergraduate degree programs (majors), other undergraduate programs (e.g., minors/certificates), graduate degree programs, and other graduate programs (e.g., credentials/certificates)-into quartiles based upon the criteria described in Section III for undergraduate programs) and Section IV (for graduate programs).
Section V of the Policy on Instructional Program Priorities: Academic
Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management states that “the
process of making recommendations for academic prioritization shall result in
undergraduate and graduate/credential programs (separately) being grouped into
quartiles based upon the criteria described in Sections III and IV.” This
ranking process places programs into two groupings. Based on the most current
list of approved programs received from Academic Affairs, there are 238
programs in the undergraduate grouping and 122 programs in the graduate
grouping.
Whereas, each quartile grouping would result in four (4) clusters of
equal frequencies, the undergraduate grouping (with 238 programs) would have
approx. 60 programs within each quartile cluster and the graduate grouping
(with 122 programs) would have approx. 30 programs within each quartile
cluster.
Based on the most current list of approved programs received from
Academic Affairs, the breakdown of undergraduate programs are:
·
140
programs are majors
·
83
programs are minors
·
15
programs are certificate
Based on the most current list of approved programs received from
Academic Affairs, the breakdowns of graduate programs are:
·
94
programs are majors
·
28
programs fall in the certificate/credential category
The task of comparing and ranking dissimilar programs is a formidable one.
To make the task meaningful, the Senate Committee on the Policy on
Instructional Program Priorities (SCIPP) is recommending that two (2)
additional groupings be added to the ranking process. The addition of two
groupings for non-major programs at both the undergraduate and graduate level
would reduce the problems associated with ranking programs that are inherently
non-comparable on multiple criteria. For example, many minors and
certificates have extremely low or negligible costs as they rely on coursework
already embedded in majors. Conversely, only major programs strictly
"graduate" students. On balance, the Committee thinks that more
of the criteria (those not associated with cost) disadvantage non-major
programs than advantage them.
While being careful not to anticipate results, the Committee would like
to guard against the possibility that the bottom two quartiles could
potentially be weighted with non-major programs. It doesn't seem to be
within the spirit of the policy that the lower quartiles be populated with
non-major programs simply because the criteria seem more focused on
measurements associated with majors. While the majors would likely see
their rankings artificially elevated, it undermines the purpose of a quartile
approach to meaningful program comparisons.
Carried unanimously.
APC/Ex MINIMUM GRADES FOR UNDERGRADUATE PREREQUISITE
COURSEWORK, AMENDMENT TO
The Faculty Senate recommends amending the “Minimum Grades for
Undergraduate Prerequisite Coursework” as proposed in Attachment D-1.
Note: The side-by-side comparison can be found in Attachment D-2.
BACKGROUND:
Academic Affairs
referred the issue of minimum grades required for prerequisite coursework.
Currently, there is no university policy on satisfactory completion of
prerequisites. However, there is a policy that provides that a grade of “C-” be
considered a “C” for the purposes of satisfying prerequisite coursework. Last
year, there was an inquiry from Geography regarding our policy regarding a
minimum grade requirement for prerequisite coursework. This past summer, we had a similar inquiry
from Physics. In CMS, the default setting for a prerequisite is “C-”; however,
our actual policy is ambiguous as to whether or not a grade below a “C-” (i.e.
“D”) is sufficient to fulfill a prerequisite requirement.
The Academic Policies Committee voted unanimously on October 7, 2011 to
refer the item to the Executive Committee.
At the same meeting, a motion to endorse the item failed: 4 Yes, 4 No, 3
Abstentions On October 14, 2011, the Academic Policies Committee voted unanimously
to recommend the attached policy language.
The following issues were raised by APC on Minimum Grade of C- or
better in prerequisite coursework
·
The
absence of a University policy allows individual departments to enforce minimum
grade requirements without Faculty Senate approval/review. Some departments may assume the enforcement
of a specific grade.
·
If there
is uncertainty in how grades in prerequisite coursework are enforced, this may
create difficulties in student course plans and advising. Having a university baseline, or default,
would alleviate this uncertainty because it would require that departments
explicitly state their prerequisite grade requirements, if they differ from a
university standard.
·
There is
no evidence that the lack of a university minimum grade requirement is
problematic. The question of how many
students would be affected, and therefore the need for such a policy, was
raised by the committee.
·
Establishing
a minimum standard for prerequisites at the university level makes sense based
on the definition of grades in academic policy (e.g., passing with a C grade
versus passing with a D grade).
·
There is
ambiguity in the current catalog language, which suggests that some change to
the policy is needed to eliminate this ambiguity. The current catalog language is based on the
assumption that before the introduction of “+/-” grades, a “C” was required in
order to satisfy a course prerequisite.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-54A/Flr. BA AND BS POLICY CHANGE (UPPER FISISION UNITS IN MAJORS), REFERRAL
The Faculty Senate refers back to CPC with a request that the item be brought back with language that inclusively addresses all bachelor's degree types offered on this campus with respect to the number of units of coursework required in the major.
Carried.
FS 11/12-53A/Flr. ACADEMIC RENEWAL, REVISIONS TO INCLUDE GRADUATE STUDENTS, POSTPONEMENT TO
The Faculty Senate recommends to postpone pending an answer to the question of authority to make such changes, with the item to be returned to the agenda at such time as the Executive Committee deems appropriate.
Carried unanimously.
FPC-APC/EX THE
FACULTY SENATE ADOPTS THE ATTACHED ENDORSES FOUR STATEMENTS (ATTACHED)
FROM THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS (AAUP) TO SERVE AS
GUIDING PRINCIPLES ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND ACADEMIC
RESPONSIBILITY, AND FOR FPC-APC DEVELOPMENT OF FACULTY AND STUDENTS RIGHTS
AND RESPONSIBILITIES POLICIES
FS
11/12-81/SEL REFERENDUM TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE FACULTY – CHANGE
IN VOTING STATUS OF POLICY COMMITTEE CHAIRS ON THE FACULTY SENATE FROM VOTING
TO NON-VOTING, AND MINOR EDITORIAL AMENDMENTS.
Attachment B
Send to
referendum a motion to amend Article II,
Section 5A (Membership of the Faculty Senate) of the Constitution of the Faculty of California State University, Sacramento
(http://www.csus.edu/acse/constit.htm#II5) to
take effect in Fall 2012.
A. The membership of the Faculty
Senate shall be composed of (1) the representatives of the electing units; (2)
four representatives to be elected at-large by the temporary faculty from those
temporary faculty who are teaching six or more units during the semester in which
the election is conducted; (3) chairs of certain standing Policy committees of the Faculty Senate (as specified in the
committee's charge), as at-large ex-officio
non-voting members, unless
such chairs are already
serving concurrently on the
Senate as representatives of the electing units; (4) the statewide
academic senators, as ex officio, non-voting members; (5) a Faculty Emeritus member of the California State University,
Sacramento Retirees Association the President or designee of the
Emeritus Association of CSU, Sacramento, as an ex officio, non-voting
member, chosen by, and in a manner
determined by, the Association; (6) three student representatives, as
non-voting members, chosen by, and in a manner determined by, the
Associated Students, Inc. of
CSUS.
Rationale:
Needed to implement
recommendation #1 of the 2010-2011 Senate Select Committee stated in the
Committee’s May 5, 2011 memorandum to the
Faculty Senate as follows:
1.
The Select Committee
recommends amendment of the Faculty Constitution to provide that chairs of
certain policy committees of the Faculty Senate (as specified in the
committee’s charge) shall henceforth be ex-officio non-voting members of
the Senate, unless serving simultaneously as a member for a department or other
electing unit as defined in the Faculty Constitution.
Makes minor clarifying
editorial changes. Most Senate
committees are “standing” (as opposed to ad hoc) committees, but only a few are
designated as “Policy” committees with representation on the Senate. The name of the retirees association has been
changed and is inclusive of faculty, staff and administrators. ASI’s formal name is now indicated.
FS
11/12-82/SEL REFERENDUM TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE FACULTY–DELETE
REQUIREMENT FOR SENATOR REPRESENTATION ON
Send to referendum a motion
to amend Article II, Section 3B of
the Constitution of the Faculty of
California State University, Sacramento to take effect in Fall 2012.
B. The Faculty Senate shall create
such committees as it deems necessary to the performance of its duties, shall
establish rules and procedures for its committees, and shall establish methods
of selecting the membership of all required or requested committees. These
committees shall not be construed to be sub-units of the faculty, and may not
assume duties constitutionally assigned to other sub-units of the faculty. Each
of these committees shall include among its members no fewer than two (2)
voting members of the Faculty Senate. In addition, the Faculty Senate shall
elect the chairs of certain standing Policy
committees (as specified in the committee's charge).
Rationale:
For several years, the constitutional provision requiring that
standing committees of the Faculty Senate include no fewer than two Senators
has proved impractical to implement.
Would allow for an amendment
to the By-Laws as recommended in Recommendation # 10 2010-2011 Senate Select
Committee stated in the Committee’s May 2, 2011 and shown in proposed amendment
FS 11/12-84/SEL:
Makes minor clarifying
editorial change. Most Senate committees
are “standing” (as opposed to ad hoc) committees, but only a few are designated
as “Policy” committees with representation on the Senate.
FS
11/12-83/SEL BY-LAW AMENDMENTS – EDITORIAL AMENDMENTS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
OF A REFERENDUM TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE FACULTY- CHANGE IN VOTING STATUS OF POLICY COMMITTEE
CHAIRS ON THE FACULTY SENATE FROM VOTING TO NON-VOTING, AND MINOR EDITORIAL
AMENDMENTS (FS 11/12-81/SEL).
Subject to approval by referendum of the constitutional
amendment to change the voting status of Policy committee chairs on the Faculty
Senate from voting to non-voting (FS 11/12-81/SEL), the following editorial
changes will automatically be made in the By-Laws
of the Faculty Senate http://www.csus.edu/acse/bylaws.htm
to go into effect in Fall 2012.
.
(1) Amend Article 1.A. on membership on the Faculty Senate to
include the same language approved in the constitutional amendment, as follows:
Article I. A
The membership of the Faculty
Senate shall be composed of (1) the representatives of the electing units; (2)
four representatives to be elected at-large by the temporary faculty from those
temporary faculty who are teaching six or more units during the semester in
which the election is conducted; (3) chairs of certain standing Policy committees of the Faculty
Senate (as specified in the committee's charge), as at-large ex-officio non-voting members, unless such chairs are already serving concurrently on the Senate as representatives of the
electing units; (4) the statewide academic senators, as ex officio, non-voting
members; (5) a Faculty Emeritus
member of the California State University, Sacramento Retirees Association
the President or designee of the Emeritus Association of CSU, Sacramento,
as an ex officio, non-voting member, chosen
by, and in a manner determined by, the Association; (6) three student
representatives, as non-voting members, chosen by, and in a manner determined
by, the Associated Students,
Inc. of CSUS.
(2) Amend Article II. A. 1. to eliminate
redundancy, as follows (i.e. if the voting status of the chairs is changed from
voting to non-voting, the clause is unnecessary in light of the immediately
preceding sentence, which provides that “The Chair of the Faculty Senate shall
be elected by and from the voting representatives of electing units.”):
Article
II.A.1.
The Chair
of the Faculty Senate shall be elected annually by and from the voting representatives of electing
units. Committee chairs who are not also
representatives of electing units may neither serve as nor vote for chair. The
Chair shall preside at meetings of the Faculty Senate. The term of office of
the Chair shall be one year. The term shall begin at noon on the last day of
the spring semester in which he/she is elected Chair and shall end at noon on
the last day of the spring semester of the following year. The Chair may be
re-elected.
(3) Amend Article II.A.2. to eliminate redundancy, as follows (i.e. if
the voting status of the chairs is changed from voting to non-voting, clause is
unnecessary since the immediately preceding sentence, which provides that “The
Vice Chair shall be elected by and from the voting representatives of electing
units.”):
Article II.A. 2.
The
Vice Chair shall be elected annually by and from the voting representatives of electing
units. Committee
chairs who are not also representatives of electing units may neither serve as
nor vote for vice chair. In the absence of the Chair,
the Vice Chair shall preside at meetings of the Faculty Senate, and perform
other duties of the Chair as delegated by the Chair. The term of office of the
Vice Chair shall be one year. The term shall begin at noon on the last day of
the spring semester in which he/she is elected Vice Chair and shall end at noon
on the last day of the spring semester of the following year. The Vice Chair
may be re-elected.
(4) Amend Article II.B. 1. to reflect the change
in voting status of Policy committee chairs on the Faculty Senate, if the
referendum to amend the constitution in this regard is approved, as follows:
Article II. B. Other Elected Offices
1. Standing
Policy Committee Chairs.
Each
standing Policy Committee Chair, as specified in the Standing Policy Committee's Charge, shall be elected annually by the
Faculty Senate from among the full-time faculty of the University. Each Standing
Policy Committee Chair shall
preside over his or her Standing Policy Committee and shall also
serve as at-large an ex-officio voting member
of the Faculty Senate and its Executive Committee of the Faculty Senate. In addition, these Policy Committee
Chairs shall serve as ex officio non-voting members of the
Faculty Senate, unless such chairs are serving concurrently on the Senate as
representatives of electing units. The term of office of each
of these Standing
Policy Committee Chairs
shall be one year. The term shall begin at noon on the last day of the spring
semester in which he/she is elected Chair of the Standing Policy Committee and shall end
at noon on the last day of the spring semester of the following year. A faculty
member may be elected to serve up to three (3) consecutive terms of one year
each as the Chair of a standing Policy Committee. After an interval of a
year following the end of the third consecutive term, the faculty member shall
become eligible for election to the Chair of a Standing Policy Committee.
FS
11/12-84/SEL BY-LAW AMENDMENT—ARTICLE I, SECTION C--ADDITION OF DUTY TO
SERVE AS AN “INTERESTED PARTY” OF ONE POLICY COMMITTEE TO DUTIES AND
RESPONSIBILITIES OF INDIVIDUAL SENATORS.
Amend the Article I, Section
C. of the By-Laws of the Faculty Senate to include a duty for each senator to
add to each senator’s duty to serve as an “interested party” of one of the
standing Policy committees. The
amendment, as shown below, shall be added as a new paragraph after item 5 of
the enumerated list of duties and responsibilities of individual senators, and
shall be put into effect in Fall, 2012.
In addition,
each Senator, during each academic year, shall be considered to be (for that
academic year) an ex-officio non-voting interested party of one of the standing
Policy committees. As such, a Senator
will receive the notices/minutes/agenda of that committee during the academic
year of service on the Senate. In the
Spring prior to the following academic year, incoming Senators shall designate
one standing Policy committee from the current (at the time) list of standing
Policy committees. Senators who have not
designated a committee of interest by the second Senate meeting of a given
academic year shall be randomly assigned a committee and informed within the
first two meetings of the new academic year.
Similarly, Senators, upon joining the Senate at any point thereafter,
shall be given a choice of committee followed by an assignment provided in case
no choice is made.
Rationale: This proposed amendment would implement
recommendation #10 of the 2010-2011 Senate Select Committee stated in the
Committee’s May 2, 2011 memorandum to the Faculty Senate (include a link here
to the document, if there is one) to improve the “connection” between the
Senate and its Policy committees. In
addition, it aims to mitigate the effect of potential deletion of the
inoperable constitutional provision that requires that each standing committee
of the Faculty Senate have at least two Senate representatives as regular
members.
FS
11/12-85/SEL BY-LAW AMENDMENT—ARTICLE II, SECTION B. 2 AND ARTICLE IV.
SECTION A. 1 (MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE); DELETE REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC
POLICY COMMITTEES, BUT RETAIN VOTING STATUS OF CHAIRS OF “CERTAIN” POLICY COMMITTEES
ON THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.
Amend Article II, Section B.
2. AND Article IV, Section A.1. of the By-Laws as shown below to delete
reference to the names of specific Policy committees, but retain provision for
Chairs of “certain” standing Policy Committees (as specified in their charge)
to serve as voting members of the Executive committee. Both amendments shall take effect in Fall
2012.
Article II. B.2
Members of the Executive Committee
In addition to the Chair and Vice Chair of the Senate, who shall
be voting members, and the Chairs of
certain standing Policy committees as specified in the standing Policy
Committee’s charge the Academic Policies Committee, the Curriculum Policies
Committee, the Faculty Policies Committee, the General Education Policies/Graduation
Requirements Policies Committee and the Graduate Studies Policies Committee, who shall be ex-officio voting members, additional
at-large voting members of the Executive Committee shall be elected annually by
and from the electing unit representatives to maintain the Executive Committee
membership at eleven (11). The at-large elected members of the Executive
Committee shall serve for a term of one year, beginning at noon on the last day
of the spring semester in which they are elected to the Executive Committee and
ending at noon on the last day of the spring semester of the following year.
At-large Executive Committee members shall be eligible for re-election so long
as they remain electing unit representatives.
Article IV. A.1.
Membership
The eleven
(11) voting members of the Executive Committee shall be the Chair and Vice
Chair of the Faculty Senate, the Chairs of
certain Policy committees, as specified in the
committee’s charge, the
Academic Policies Committee, the Curriculum Policies Committee, the Faculty
Policies Committee, the General Education Policies/Graduation Requirements
Policies Committee and the Graduate Studies Policies Committee and the four (4)
and additional at-large
members of the Executive Committee elected by and from the voting members of
the Faculty Senate to maintain the
voting membership at eleven (11).
Rationale: These
amendments give effect to Recommendation #2 of the 2010-2011 Senate Select
Committee stated in the Committee’s May 2, 2011 memorandum to the Faculty
Senate to retain certain Policy committee chairs as voting members of the
Executive Committee. By deletion of any reference to specific committee
names in the By-Laws, the Senate will acquire greater flexibility (and perhaps
efficiency) in making changes to the number and organization of its Policy
Committees (since changes of this type would not require By-Law changes to
accommodate them.)
Adoption of this amendment
has no bearing on the Senate’s ability to accept, modify, or reject proposed
changes to the number of Policy committees specified in recommendations #3-9 of
the Select Committee Report. However, although the Constitution and/or
By-Laws require that the charges of the Policy committees specify whether the
Chair of the Committee serves as a member of the Faculty Senate and its
Executive Committee, these changes currently do not. Therefore, if the
Senate approves the above motions, it will be necessary to also approve a
motion of the type proposed in Motion III, below, to identify the Committee
Chairs who are specified to serve. (See Motion III and its accompanying
rationale.)
FS 11/12-86/SEL BY-LAW AMENDMENT – EDITORIAL CHANGES
The Faculty Senate makes the following editorial changes to
the By-Laws of the Faculty Senate.
1. Amend Article II. Section C. 1, as follows:
A parliamentarian shall be selected
nominated by the
Executive Committee and approved by the Faculty Senate at the first meeting of
the Faculty Senate during the Fall semester of each academic year.
2. Change the name of committees
whose chairs serve as ex-officio
members of the Senate “Standing”
committees” to “standing Policy” or “Policy” committees
3. Amend Article II. G.,
paragraph 4, as follows: (note: this is not a change in current policy, but a correction
of a clerical error in the published By-Laws).
If
the office of Chair of a standing Policy Committee with membership on the Executive Committee becomes vacant
the Vice Chair shall preside over the routine business of the Policy Committee until the Faculty Senate
shall elect a successor as provided in Article II, Sections D.3 4and E.3 5 of these Bylaws. The
Vice Chair, acting under this provision, shall not serve as an ex-officio non-voting member of
the Executive Committee.
FS
11/12-87/SEL STANDING RULES-2012-2013 POLICY COMMITTEE CHAIR MEMBERSHIP ON
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.
To adopt the following: For
the 2012-13 Academic Year, the Chairs of the following Policy Committees shall
serve as ex-officio voting members of Faculty Senate Executive Committee:
Academic Policies Committee, Curriculum Policies Committee, Faculty Policies
Committee, General Education and Graduation Requirements Policy Committee, and
Graduate Studies Policy Committee. Furthermore,
for the 2012-2013 Academic Year, the Chairs of the Policy Committees
named above shall be ex-officio members of the Faculty Senate, with voting
status to depend on the disposition of FS 11/12-81/SEL, a proposed referendum
to change the voting status of these Chairs on the Senate from voting to non-voting,
unless such chairs are serving
concurrently on the Senate as representatives of electing units
Rationale: Although the
Constitution and/or By-Laws require that the charges of the Policy committees
specify whether the Chair of the Committee serves as a member of the Faculty
Senate and its Executive Committee, those charges do not so specify at
present. The only place this is currently specified is in the
By-Laws. Although the Select Committee will be presenting a set of
motions to revise the Policy Committee structure in accordance with
recommendations #3-9 of the prior select committee report, and has included in
the proposed charges specification of the Chair’s membership on the Executive
Committee and the Senate, these revisions are recommended for implementation in
2013-2014. Therefore, regardless of the Senate’s actions on proposed
revisions of the Committee structure, and this Select Committee’s
recommendation to delete the names of the Committees from the By-Laws (FS
11/12-85/SEL), it is necessary to specify which Committee Chairs shall serve as
members of the Executive Committee and Senate in 2012-2013. If the
proposed revisions to the Committee structure are rejected by the Senate, then
the charges of the current Policy Committees will need to be revised in
accordance with the constitution and by-laws to specify that they shall be
members of the Senate and its Executive Committee.
These amendments give effect
to Recommendation #2 of the 2010-2011 Senate Select Committee stated in the Committee’s
May 2, 2011 memorandum to the Faculty Senate to retain certain Policy committee
chairs as voting members of the Executive Committee. By deletion of any
reference to specific committee names in the By-Laws, the Senate is will
acquire greater flexibility (and perhaps efficiency) in making changes to the
number and organization of its Policy committees (since changes of this type
would not require By-Law changes to accommodate them.)
Adoption of this amendment
has no bearing on the Senate’s ability to accept, modify, or reject proposed
changes to the number of Policy committees specified in recommendations #3-9 of
the Select Committee Report. However, although the Constitution and/or
By-Laws require that the charges of the Policy committees specify whether the
Chair of the Committee serves as a member of the Faculty Senate and its
Executive Committee, those charges currently do not. Therefore, if the
Senate approves the above motions, it will be necessary to also approve a
motion of the type proposed in Motion III to identify the Committee Chairs who
are to serve. (See Motion III and its accompanying rationale).
FS 11/12-97/EX SEARCH COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT
Associate
Vice President for Student Affairs, Student Engagement and Success
The Faculty Senate endorses the following pool from which two faculty members may be selected to serve on the above search committee.
§ Deidre Sessoms, Teacher Education, ED
§ Jennifer Lundmark, Biological Sciences, NSM
§ Greg Shaw, Recreation, Parks & Tourism Administration, HHS
§ Kristin Van Gaasbeck, Economics, SSIS
§ Dave Evans, Geology, NSM
§ Edward Shea, Mathematics and Statistics, NSM
§ Sherrie Carinci, Teacher Education, ED
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-98/EX COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY
Institutional
Scholarship Committee
Juliana Raskauskas, 2014
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-99/FLR RESOLUTION ON SUG FUNDING FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS
Resolved that the California State University, Sacramento Faculty Senate expresses its strong objection to the CSU Chancellor and the Board of Trustees to any proposed discontinuation or suspension of the award of State University Grants to graduate students.
And be it further resolved that a copy of this resolution be conveyed to the Chancellor, the Chair of the Board of Trustees, the Chair of the Academic Senate of the CSU, and all campus Senate Chairs.
Carried.
FS 11/12-93/EX POLICY ON PROGRAM IMPACTION, RECOMMENDATION TO MAKE PERMANENT
The Faculty Senate recommends the adoption of a permanent policy, as attached, to begin with the AY 2012-2013.
Carried unanimously.
CPC/EX PROGRAM PROPOSALS
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following Program Deletions:
A. Music: MM – Concentration in Music History and Literature Attachment G
B. BA: Music Management Concentration Attachment H
C. Mm: Music Education Concentration Attachment I
Carried unanimously.
CPC/EX PROGRAM PROPOSAL
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following Program Proposal:
A. Biological Sciences – Undergraduate Program: Pre-major Attachment J
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-90/Flr CAMPUS SMOKING POLICY, RECOMMENDATION TO REVIEW (Renamed following approval of substitute motion.)
In response to concerns and recommendations
brought forth from The Public Health Club, the Faculty
Senate requests that the President establish a task force to include
representatives from appropriate offices and campus groups to review the campus
smoking policy with the aim of recommending, within a time certain to respond,
revisions to the policy or its implementation as necessary and feasible to:
1. Improve clarity
of the policy (e.g., defining what constitutes a “major walkway” where smoking
is currently prohibited)
2. Facilitate compliance
with the policy (e.g., increased use of signage designating smoking and
non-smoking areas and other means shown to be effective in improving
compliance.)
3. Improve
enforcement of the policy (e.g., authorizing citations)
4. Further reduce exposure
to second hand smoke (e.g., extending the zone from building entrances where
smoking is not permitted, specific designation of smoking areas).
5. Provide
assistance to members of the campus community to aid with smoking cessation
(e.g., implementation of a cessation assistance program for employees similar
to programs currently available to students.)
Carried.
FS 11/12-115/Flr. SCIPP – ESTABLISHMENT OF AN AUXLIARY WORK GROUP
The Faculty Senate endorses the SCIPP plan to identify three faculty members to read and provide summaries of the outcomes document subject to confirmation of the names of the three members by the Senate.
Carried.
FS
11/12-110/EX ACADEMIC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC
GOALS, ADOPTION OF
Assessment of the progress
towards meeting the goals defined in each of the above areas will provide the
evidence needed to focus efforts on improvement. By identifying where
improvements are needed, priorities can be set to guide efforts toward this
improvement. As noted in section III.B.b, the Academic Information Technology
Committee will establish a strategic plan which will include the evaluation
process to be used in an on-going basis to measure progress in each area of the
plan.
The strategic plan (referred to
in Section III.B.a) will establish the process for assessing the goals defined
in Sections I and II. The plan will
define the process whereby assessments will be used to provide the evidence
needed to focus efforts on improvement.
Benchmarks will be defined in order to understand the magnitude of the
need. Using these benchmarks, the
evaluation of these assessments will provide the basis for the Academic
Information Technology Committee to establish priorities and to recommend to
the President actions to guide efforts toward improvement. These
recommendations and their rationale will be brought to the Senate for their
approval.
Carried unanimously.
FS
11/12-111/EX ACADEMIC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC
PLAN, REFERRAL TO AITC TO DEVELOP
The
Faculty Senate charges the Senate’s Academic Information Technology Committee
(AITC) to develop and bring to the Senate a recommended strategic planning
process that will provide for:
a)
The
ongoing assessment of the goals specified in Sections I, II and III of the
“Academic Information Technology Goals” document,
b)
The
modification of these goals, as needed, to reflect changes in technology and
pedagogy, and
c)
Recommendations, as appropriate, towards achieving these
goals.
The establishment of benchmarks to provide the basis for the Academic
Information Technology Committee to recommend to the Senate priorities and
actions to guide efforts toward improvement.
Carried
unanimously.
GSPC/EX POLICY
ON GRADUATE LEARNING GOALS/OBJECTIVES, ESTABLISHMENT OF
Background
Recently, the College of Engineering and Computer Science underwent a review of its graduate programs. The first recommendation to the Faculty Senate by the program review team said, in part, that the Senate should “[c]larify and/or develop University graduate learning outcomes, and graduate assessment policies and procedures.” This recommendation was referred to the Graduate Studies Policies Committee (GSPC) on December 29, 2011. A couple of years prior, GSPC had developed Graduate Learning Goals (GLGs) to be considered for adoption by the Faculty Senate, as a companion policy to the Baccalaureate Learning Goals adopted by the Senate, but the Executive Committee declined to forward them to the Senate for its consideration.
Purpose
Just as the Baccalaureate Learning Goals were adopted to guide and support undergraduate programs, Graduate Learning Goals can offer similar guidance and support. In particular, GLGs can assist in program review, in the Instructional Program Priority (IPP) process, and in program improvement as units consider various means of better meeting student needs.
Rationale
When learning objectives have been discussed in relation to graduate programs in the past, the varied nature of the programs has been cited as a problem in writing common objectives across disciplines. For example, a Master of Arts in Literature may not share many common objectives with a clinical Master of Science in a health related field. With doctoral programs added into the mix, the variety is only greater. However, it seems reasonable to suggest that each graduate program could define its own set of learning objectives, specific to the level of study and to the discipline, which are clearly more advanced in content than those defined for related undergraduate work. For some programs, these might already be defined, at least in part, by external accrediting agencies. Such defined objectives could also form the basis for assessment plans within graduate programs and offer foci for future academic program review teams.
Proposed Policy
The Faculty Senate recommends that departments/interdisciplinary groups with graduate
programs in their purview be required to establish Graduate Learning
Goals/Objectives, and assessment components associated with them, to be
submitted to Academic Affairs within one full academic year of approval of this
policy. The Faculty Senate further
recommends that in developing graduate learning goals/objectives, faculty may consult resources
such as the information submitted in the Instructional Program
Priorities (IPP) process, the Graduate Learning Goals recommended by the
Graduate Studies Policies Committee (see attachment), and/or the Lumina
Foundation Degree Qualifications Profile in framing their learning
goals/objectives and assessment components.
(http://www.luminafoundation.org/publications/The_Degree_Qualifications_Profile.pdf)
Carried
FS 11/12-114a/Flr PROGRAM PROPOSAL – MA IN HUMANITIES
With regard to the Program Change Proposal from the Department of Humanities shown in Attachments C and C-1, the Faculty Senate:
(1) recommends against approval of the proposed new MA in Humanities at this time;
(2) recommends that the Department of Humanities be invited to resubmit for Senate review a full proposal for a new MA in Humanities, which includes documentation required under "Procedures for Requesting Projection of New Degree Programs on the CSUS Academic Master Plan -- Regular, Fast Track and Pilot Programs" section of the shown in the "Policy for New Degree Programs" (http://www.csus.edu/umanual/AcadAff/FSP00010.htm); and
(3) recommends that the MA in Liberal Arts be retained in its current form until such time as a PCP for its discontinuation is submitted, reviewed and approved.
Carried unanimously.
CPC/EC PROGRAM PROPOSAL – MA IN HUMANITIES
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following program proposal:
Arts and
Letters
A. MA in Humanities. Attachment C and Attachment C-1
Carried unanimously.
CPC/EX PROGRAM PROPOSALS
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following program proposals:
Arts
and Letters
A. Minor in Russian Program Attachment A
B. Undergraduate Minor in Chinese Attachment B
C. Undergraduate Portuguese Minor Attachment C
D. Undergraduate Minor in Latin Attachment D
E. BA in Photography Attachment P
Carried unanimously.
CPC/EX PROGRAM PROPOSALS
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following program proposals:
Engineering
and Computer Science
A. BS in Civil Engineering Attachment E
B. BS Electrical and Electronic Engineering Attachment Q
Carried unanimously.
CPC/EX PROGRAM PROPOSALS
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following program proposals:
Health
and Human Services
A. BS in Health Science Attachment F
B. Minor in Occupational Health and Safety Attachment G
C. Kinesiology: Pre-Therapy Attachment H
D. Kinesiology: Teaching Option Attachment I
E. Major in Health Science Attachment J
F. Minor in Health Science Attachment K
G. Minor in Social Work Attachment L
Carried unanimously.
CPC/EX PROGRAM PROPOSAL
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following program proposal:
Arts
and Letters
A. English Department MA Composition Emphasis Attachment M
Carried unanimously.
CPC/EX PROGRAM PROPOSAL
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following program proposal:
Social
Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies
A. BS Women’s Studies Attachment O
Carried unanimously.
CPC/EX PROGRAM REVIEW
The Faculty Senate recommends that all of the degree programs
within the Department of Government be approved for six years
or until the next scheduled program review. Attachment N
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-124/EX RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE CAMPUS SMOKING POLICY TASK FORCE
The Faculty Senate endorses the appointment of faculty members to the
Smoking Policy Task Force contingent upon one being selected
from Group A and one being selected from Group B:
GROUP A
§
Kristen Alexander,
Child Development
§
Heather Diaz,
Kinesiology & Health Science
§
Irene Bersola-Nguyen,
Child Development
§
Sue Taylor, Social
Work
§
Patty Woodward,
Kinesiology & Health Science
GROUP B
§
Tom Matthews,
Electrical & Electronic Engineering
§
Val Smith,
Communication Studies
§
Chris Bellon,
Philosophy
§
Ann Moylan, Family
& Consumer Sciences
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-125/Flr. ESTABLISHMENT OF AN AUXLIARY SCIPP WORK GROUP
The Faculty Senate endorses recruitment, by SCIPP, of the following faculty members to assist SCIPP in evaluation of the IPP learning outcomes/assessment criterion, prior to final program ranking by the full membership of SCIPP:
§ Ben Amata, Library
§ Milica Markovic, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
§ Chris Bellon, Philosophy
Carried.
APC/EX ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR FALL 2012
The Faculty Senate endorses the proposed enrollment management
plan for Fall 2012
as described in Section 1 of Attachment X.
CPC/EX PROGRAM
PROPOSALS
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the
following program proposals:
Arts and Letters
A.
MA English,
Composition Concentration Attachment A
B.
MA English,
Creative Writing Concentration Attachment B
C.
MA English,
Literature Concentration Attachment C
Carried
unanimously.
CPC/EX PROGRAM
PROPOSALS
The Faculty Senate
recommends approval of the following program proposals:
Business Administration
A.
MBA, General
Program Attachment K
B.
MBA, Finance
Concentration Attachment L
Carried
unanimously.
CPC/EX PROGRAM
PROPOSAL
The Faculty Senate
recommends approval of the following program proposal:
Health and Human Services
A.
MS Physical Education
(Teaching) Attachment J
Carried
unanimously.
FS 11/12-135/EX COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY
Grade Appeals Procedural Appeals Board
Susan Crawford, 2015
Carried
unanimously.
FS 11/12-136/EX FACULTY
SENATOR REPRESENTING TEMPORARY FACULTY, APPOINTMENT OF
Background:
Article I, Section B.5. of the Faculty Senate By-laws “Vacancy in the office of
representative” specifies the following: “If a vacancy occurs in the office of
representative of the temporary faculty, the Faculty Senate shall appoint one
of the alternates to serve for the remainder of the term. In the absence of an
alternate, the Faculty Senate may appoint from among the temporary faculty a
successor who shall serve for the remainder of the term. The Senate shall
confine its choice of a successor to a member of the temporary faculty who
holds an appointment from the University to no fewer than six (6) WTU’s during
the semester of appointment.” There is a vacancy.
The Faculty Senate appoints Ted Scott-Femenella as a
Faculty Senator representing
Temporary Faculty to complete a term ending in Spring
2014.
Carried
unanimously.
FS 11/12-130/Flr 2012
COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES
Committee Meeting Schedule:
#1: Tuesday,
May 1, 3:00-3:20 p.m., SAC 275
#2: Tuesday,
May 8, 3:00-3:20 p.m., SAC 275
Executive
Committee Members:
Anthony Sheppard, Chair |
Recreation, Parks &
Tourism Administration (HHS) |
Janet Hecsh, Vice Chair |
Teacher Education (EDU) |
Kristin Van Gaasbeck, APC
Chair |
Economics (SSIS) |
Jana Noel, FPC Chair |
Teacher Education (EDU) |
Dan Melzer, CPC Chair |
English (A&L) |
Reza Peigahi, GE/GRPC
Chair |
Library |
Christine Miller, GSPC
Chair |
Communication Studies
(A&L) |
Dale Russell, At-large
Member |
Social Work (HHS) |
Ray Koegel, At-large
Member |
Communication Studies
(A&L) |
Bob Buckley, At-large
Member |
Computer Science (ECS) |
Lisa Hammersley, At-large
Member |
Geology (NSM) |
Senior
Student Services Senator: Tom Carroll
Senior
Library Senator: Mary Reddick
The following
Senators were elected to represent the seven colleges.
College Senators:
Chris Bellon, Philosophy (A&L)
Jim Wanket, Geography (NSM)
Mary Kirlin, Public Policy Administration (SSIS)
Boniface Michael, Management (CBA)
Melina Bersamin, Child Development (EDU)
Ben Fell, Civil Engineering (ECS)
Sue Escobar, Criminal Justice (HHS)
CPC/EX PROGRAM PROPOSALS
The
Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following program proposals:
Business Administration
A.
MBA, Human
Resource Management Concentration Attachment S
B.
MBA, Management Computer
Applications Concentration Attachment T
C.
MBA, Marketing
Concentration Attachment U
D.
MBA, Urban Land
Development Concentration Attachment V
Carried
unanimously (First
reading waived.)
CPC/EX PROGRAM PROPOSAL
The
Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following program proposal:
Health and Human Services
A. MS Nursing, Family Nurse Practitioner track and Nursing Administration Role Attachment W
Carried
(First Reading waived.)
/EX FACULTY SENATE COMMENDATION FOR PRESIDENT ALEXANDER GONZALEZ
WHEREAS: In
2007 the Faculty Senate of California State University, Sacramento sent to a
referendum of the faculty a Resolution of No Confidence in President Alexander
Gonzalez (FS07-22/Ex.), driven by deep faculty concern over a range of issues,
including the degree of transparency in the university budget process, and a
perceived disregard for aspects of the shared governance process; and
WHEREAS: The
referendum resolution also called for the development of a list of specific
actions President Gonzalez needed to take in order to restore confidence in his
leadership; and
WHEREAS: After passage of the referendum an ad hoc
committee was established for the purpose of addressing faculty concerns and
specifying ways to ameliorate them (FS08-45/Ex.); and
WHEREAS: With
the assistance of the Center for Collaborative Policy, President Gonzalez and
the faculty have since worked collaboratively to achieve shared goals,
resulting in, among other things:
· the establishment of the University
Budget Advisory Committee (UBAC), which consists of broad representation from
the University community;
· the development of a 2009 Statement on Shared Governance and
Consultation at California State University, Sacramento (FS09-38/Ex.);
· the declaration of university-wide
convocation events that have addressed issues of significance to the entire campus
community and fostered campus unity;
· the initiation of open,
university-wide dialogues on the current state of the University and a vision
for its future; and
WHEREAS: As
a result of these and other actions, there have been significant improvements
in campus climate in the areas of budget transparency and shared governance
during the past five years; be it therefore
RESOLVED: That
while this action is not intended to invalidate the 2007 referendum vote of the
faculty, and does not seek a referendum to
this effect, the Faculty Senate commends and
thanks President Gonzalez for his demonstrated commitment to shared governance
and budget transparency, and shares his commitment to access and academic
quality as the University addresses the major challenges it faces now and in
the future.
THE FACULTY SENATE DIRECTS that copies of this
resolution be distributed to President Alexander Gonzalez, Chancellor Charles
B. Reed, the CSU Board of Trustees, campus presidents, the chair of the
Academic Senate of the California State University, and campus senate chairs.
Carried (by paper ballot) (First Reading waived.)
FS 11/12/-139/FPC/EX FACULTY
CONSULTATION ON THE SELECTION OF ASSOCIATE
OR ASSISTANT COLLEGE DEANS POLICY, REVISION TO
The Faculty
Senate endorses revisions to the Faculty Consultation on the
Selection of Associate or Assistant College Deans
policy as indicated in Attachment B
Carried
unanimously.
FS
11/12-50/GSPC/EX SECOND
BACHELOR’S ACADEMIC ACTION CATEGORIES POLICY,
ESTABLISHMENT OF
The Faculty
Senate recommends the establishment of the Second Bachelor’s Academic
Action Categories
Policy as indicated in Attachment
C.
Background
information is provided in Attachment
C-1.
Carried
unanimously.
FS
11/12-53/GSPC/EX ACADEMIC
RENEWAL FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS POLICY, ESTABLISHMENT OF
The Faculty
Senate recommends the establishment of the Second Bachelor’s Academic
Action
Categories Policy as indicated in Attachment
D
Carried
unanimously.
FS
11/12-142/CPC/EX PROGRAM
PROPOSAL
The
Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following program proposal.
Arts
and Letters
Digital
Media Minor Proposal Attachment
B
1.
Background
information can be found at Attachment
B-1
Carried
unanimously.
FS 11/12-145/CPC/EX PROGRAM PROPOSAL
The
Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following program proposal.
Social Science and Interdisciplinary
Studies
Undergraduate
Psychology Major Attachment
T
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-150/EX UNIVERSITY
ARTP POLICY, AMENDMENT OF
The
Faculty Senate recommends amendment of the University ARTP policy by adding
the
following sentence to the end of Section 5.05.E.1.c.1:
In
those cases where a group of faculty is not organized by department the faculty
shall
elect
annually one of their number to perform the part of the department chair under
this
section.
Background information can be found at Attachment
V.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-146/CC COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS – SENATE
Academic
Policies Committee
Kristin
Van Gaasbeck, 2015
Todd
Migliaccio, 2015
Sue
Escobar, 2015
Juliana
Raskauskas, 2015
Curriculum
Policies Committee
Kath
Pinch, 2015
Stephanie
Biagetti, 2015
Committee
on Diversity and Equity
Jude
Antonyappan, 2015
Elvia Ramirez,
2015
Tyra-Ping
Shao, 2015
Elections
Committee
Clare Lewis
Faculty
Endowment for Student Scholarship Committee
Ann Moylan,
2015
Faculty
Policies Committee
Maggie Beddow,
2015
Wendy Buchan,
2015
Ta-Chen Wang,
2015
General
Education/Graduation Requirements Policies Committee
Chris Taylor,
2015
Dana Kivel,
2015
Sue Holl, 2015
Lisa Harrison,
2015
Thomas
Krabacher, 2014
Graduate
Studies Policies Committee
Christine
Miller, 2015
Tracy
Hamilton, 2015
Mary Reddick,
2015
Livingston
Annual Faculty Lecture Committee
George
Paganelis, 2015
Tom Krabacher,
2015
Carried
unanimously.
FS 11/12-151/Flr FACULTY SENATE
COMMENDATION FOR JOSEPH F. SHELEY
WHEREAS: In 1996, Dr.
Joseph F. Sheley returned to his alma mater, California State University,
Sacramento, after a distinguished career as a Sociology professor at Tulane
University; and
WHEREAS: During his
tenure at Tulane, Dr. Sheley developed a healthy respect for the role of
faculty senates in shared governance, including service as faculty head of its
University Senate; and
WHEREAS: After arriving at
CSUS and serving with distinction as Dean of the College of Social Sciences and
Interdisciplinary Studies, Dr. Sheley rose to the lofty position of Provost and
Vice President for Academic Affairs; and
WHEREAS: In that
position, Dr. Sheley routinely demonstrated grace under pressure, while
modeling the shared governance virtues of transparency and consultation; and
WHEREAS: In his
capacity as Provost Dr. Sheley also exhibited a singular clarity of purpose, steadfastly
placing students at the forefront of any decision matrix; and
WHEREAS: Dr. Sheley’s leadership positions
have showcased his deep and abiding commitment to public higher education,
inspiring faculty, students and staff to work collaboratively toward the
betterment of educational quality and student access; therefore be it
RESOLVED: That the California State University,
Sacramento Faculty Senate extends its profound appreciation to Dr. Joseph F.
Sheley
for his tireless efforts to improve academic programs
and student success at this institution; and be it further
RESOLVED: That the Faculty Senate offers its
heartfelt best wishes to Dr. Sheley
as he assumes
his new post at the helm of CSU Stanislaus;
and be it
further
RESOLVED: That the Faculty Senate encourages Dr.
Sheley to return to CSUS
at any time,
most especially if he wishes to sit through yet
another Senate
meeting.
Carried
unanimously.
FS 11/12-147/CPC/EX CREDIT HOUR DEFINITION
POLICY, ESTABLISHMENT OF
The Faculty
Senate recommends establishment of an interim policy defining credit hours
(to expire at
the end of the 2012-2013 AY) as appears in Attachment
S.
Background
information can be found in Attachment
S-1.
Carried
unanimously.
FS 11/12-144A/EX MOTION TO POSTPONE
FS 11/12-144A/EX UNTIL THE FIRST MEETING
OF FALL SEMESTER 2012 OF THE FACULTY SENATE.
The Faculty Senate
postpones FS 11/12-144/EX Bylaws Revision – clarifying
the
Eligibility of a Senator Who has Already Served Five Years at the Time of
Re-election,
until the Faculty Senate’s first meeting of Fall semester 2012.
Carried
FS 11/12-144/EX BYLAWS
REVISION – CLARIFYING THE ELIGIBILITY OF A SENATOR
WHO HAS ALREADY SERVED FIVE YEARS AT THE TIME
OF RE-ELECTION
One of the
following two choices to be selected by the Senate for insertion after
Article I,
Section 6 of the Faculty Constitution:
A.
A
representative who has served for no fewer than five consecutive years shall be
deemed to have served for six consecutive years for the purpose of determining
his or her continuing eligibility for immediate re-election to the office of
representative.
B.
A
representative who has served for no fewer than five consecutive years shall
remain eligible to be re-elected to the office of representative and to serve
in that office until he or she has served continuously for as many as but no
more than six consecutive years.
FS 11/12-148A/EX MOTION TO POSTPONE
FS 11/12-148A/EX UNTIL THE FIRST
MEETING OF FALL SEMESTER 2012 OF THE FACULTY SENATE.
The Faculty
Senate postpones FS 11/12-148/EX Bylaws Revision – Timing of
Election of
Temporary Faculty Senators, until the Faculty Senate’s first meeting
of Fall
semester 2012.
Carried.
FS 11/12-148/EX BYLAW
REVISION – TIMING OF ELECTION OF TEMPORARY FACULTY SENATORS
The Faculty
Senate amends it’s bylaws in Section I-B-2 as follows:
Elections to the office of representative
(or alternate) except in the case of the temporary faculty representatives
and alternates, shall be conducted and results reported to the Senate
Office in the Spring semester prior to the date of the organizational meeting
of the new Senate to serve for the following college year. Each electing unit
shall be responsible for its own elections.
The Senate Election Committee shall be
responsible for the conduct of the temporary faculty elections.
Election of the representatives (or alternates)
representing the temporary faculty shall be held in the Fall semester preceding
the college year in which the representatives will serve in order to ensure
their availability to vote in Senate elections in the spring.
Elections shall be by secret ballot, and
all ballots shall be distributed and collected on campus.
FS 11/12-104/SEL: STANDING RULES: CREATES THE ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICY COMMITTEE TO
REPLACE THE EXISTING CURRICULUM POLICIES COMMITTEE, GRADUATE STUDIES POLICIES COMMITTEE,
AND GE/GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS POLICIES COMMITTEE; RENAMES THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR
CURRICULUM AS THE COURSE AND PROGRAM PROPOSAL REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE; AND CREATES
A GRADUATE PROGRAMS SUBCOMMITTEE; ALL TO BE EFFECTIVE IN AY 2013-2014.
Amends/rescinds FS 09-11B and AS 94-98A
(CPC), FS 08-54, FS 08-65 and FS 09-10 (GSPC), FS 09-11D and AS 94-98A
(GE/GRPC) and AS 06-87 (Subcommittee for Curriculum).
The Faculty Senate creates the Academic Affairs Policy
Committee (AAPC), as described below, to replace, in 2013-2014, the existing
Curriculum Policies Committee (CPC), Graduate Studies Policies Committee (GSPC)
and GE/Graduation Requirements Policies Committee (GE/GRPC); renames the
Subcommittee for Curriculum as the Course and Program Proposal Review Committee;
and creates a Graduate Programs Subcommittee with a reporting relationship to
the AAPC established herein. The Faculty
Senate shall appoint the membership of the new committee in Spring 2013 for the
purpose of electing a committee chair who shall take office as a member of the
Executive Committee at noon on the last day of the Spring 2013 semester, and to
ensure that the committee is in place to conduct regular business at the
beginning of AY 2013-2014.
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS
POLICY COMMITTEE[1]
Charge: The Academic Affairs Policy Committee, a standing Policy Committee of the Faculty
Senate, acts as a consultative and deliberative body of the Faculty
Senate. The Committee is responsible for the development, review and
revision of policy and other matters pertaining to the undergraduate,
post-baccalaureate and graduate curricula.
Accordingly, the Committee has oversight with respect to policies
governing the development, review, and sustainability of the curriculum at
Sacramento State, course and program approval process—including Major, Minor,
Certificate, Credential, General Education and Graduation Requirements—and the
assessment of student learning outcomes in courses and programs, and other
matters as deemed necessary by the Executive Committee of the Faculty
Senate. The Committee shall supervise generally the work of its
subcommittees and may refer, remove or receive from them matters that require
reconsideration of policies pertaining to Academic Affairs.
Membership: Voting members
shall include: 11 faculty
members appointed by the Faculty Senate to a three year term, including one
faculty member from the Library or Student Services Professionals-Academically Related
units, and ten College-based faculty members.
More than one member may be from a single college but no two members may
be from the same department/unit. Every
effort shall be made to encourage membership from each college.
Non-voting
members shall include:
-
one staff member appointed by the University Staff Assembly to a
two year term;
-
one undergraduate student appointed by ASI to a one year term;
-
one graduate student appointed by ASI to a one year term;
-
ex-officio members of the administration as determined by the
Executive Committee and the President, and which shall normally include: the
Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies and Dean of Graduate Studies (or
comparable offices), and may include others as deemed necessary to the work of
the Committee;
-
Faculty Senate Chair
Officers:
Election and Role
of Chair
A)
The Chair shall be elected annually by the Faculty Senate as
described in the By-Laws of the Faculty Senate. The Committee Chair shall be
included among the 11 voting members of the Committee.
B)
The term of office of the Academic Affairs Policy Committee
Chair shall be one year. The term shall begin at noon on the last day of the
spring semester in which s/he is elected the Academic Affairs Policy Committee
Chair and shall end at noon on the last day of the spring semester of the
following year.
C)
A faculty member may be elected to serve up to three consecutive
terms of one year each as the Chair of the Academic Affairs Policy Committee.
After an interval of a year following the end of the third consecutive term,
the faculty member shall become eligible again for election to the Chair of the Academic Affairs Policy Committee.
D)
The Academic Affairs Policy Committee Chair shall also serve as an ex-officio non-voting
member of the Faculty Senate, unless concurrently serving as the elected
representative of his or her department/unit.
E)
The Academic Affairs Policy Committee Chair shall also serve as an ex-officio voting member of
the Executive Committee.
Election and Role
of Vice Chair(s)
At its first
meeting of the academic year, the Academic Affairs Policy Committee shall elect
from among its voting members a Vice Chair for Undergraduate Affairs and a Vice-Chair for Graduate Affairs. The Vice Chair for Undergraduate Affairs
shall serve as acting chair in the absence of the Chair. Each Vice Chair shall serve as Committee
liaison to Subcommittees as specified below.
Committees/Subcommittees that report to
the Academic Affairs Policy Committee:
Liaisons to Subcommittees:
The Committee shall appoint one of its
voting members to serve as liaison between itself and each of the following
subcommittees:
The
Undergraduate Vice-Chair shall serve as liaison to:
The Graduate
Vice-Chair shall serve as liaison to:
Operations:
A) The Committee shall work in close coordination with
other Faculty Senate Policy Committees and other Senate and University
committees/subcommittees in the performance of its duties.
B) Issues considered by the Academic Affairs Policy may be
referred as well by the Executive Committee to any of the other committees of
the Faculty Senate. The Committee may
similarly refer issues to other Senate committees through the Executive
Committee.
C) The Academic Affairs Policy Committee shall meet at least once a month at a designated time
and place.
D) A quorum of the Committee shall require the presence
of at least six voting members. The
Committee shall not act in the absence of a quorum.
E) Committee meetings
shall be open to the university community.
F) The meeting agenda and supporting documentation shall
be distributed to Committee members at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.
G) Committee agendas
and minutes of the meeting shall be published on the Faculty Senate homepage in
a timely manner.
Motion failed.
FS 11/12-100/SEL: STANDING RULES:
MEMBERSHIP AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR ALL APPOINTED STANDING POLICY
COMMITTEES OF THE FACULTY SENATE whose
chairs are designated members of the executive committee
The Faculty Senate adopts the following general
guidelines to govern the membership and operating procedures for all appointed
standing Policy Committees whose chairs are designated members of the Executive
Committee. Upon adoption, these guidelines shall be applied to any existing or
newly established appointed standing Policy committee whose chairs are
designated members of the Executive Committee.
Membership & Operating Procedures of Appointed Standing
Policy Committees of the Faculty Senate Whose Chairs are Designated Members of
the Executive Committee[4]
(These
guidelines pertain to all standing Policy Committees with variations as noted
in individual charges)
Membership
Voting members shall include: 11 faculty
members appointed by the Faculty Senate to a three year term, including one
faculty member from the Library or Student Services Professionals-Academically
Related units; and ten College-based faculty members. More than one member may be from a single
college but no two members may be from the same department/unit. Every effort shall be made to encourage
membership from each college.
Non-voting members shall include: one staff
member appointed by the University Staff Assembly to a two year term; at least
one, but no more than two, students appointed by ASI to a one year term;
ex-officio members of the administration as specified in each Policy Committee
charge; and the Faculty Senate Chair.
Election and Role of Policy Committee Chairs
A)
The Chair of each
Policy Committee shall be elected annually by the Faculty Senate as described
in the By-Laws of the Faculty Senate.
The Committee Chair shall be included in the count of the 11 voting
members.
B)
The term of
office of a Policy Committee Chair shall be one year. The term shall begin at
noon on the last day of the spring semester in which s/he is elected Chair and
shall end at noon on the last day of the spring semester of the following year.
C)
A faculty member
may be elected to serve up to three consecutive terms of one year each as the
Chair of the same Policy Committee. After an interval of one year following the
end of the third consecutive term, the faculty member shall become eligible for
election to the Chair of this Policy Committee.
D)
Each Policy
Committee Chair shall also serve as an ex-officio non-voting member of the
Faculty Senate, unless concurrently serving as the elected representative of
his or her department/unit.
E)
Each Policy
Committee Chair shall also serve as a voting member of the Executive Committee.
Election and Role of Policy Committee Vice Chair(s)
A)
At its first meeting of the academic year, each Policy
Committee shall elect, from among its voting membership, a Vice Chair and any
other committee officers deemed appropriate.
B)
The Vice Chair of a Policy Committee shall preside over the routine
business of a Policy Committee in the absence of the Committee Chair or, should
the office of Policy Committee Chair become vacant, until the election of a new
Committee Chair; the Policy Committee Vice Chair shall not serve as an
ex-officio member of the Senate or its Executive Committee.
Operations
A)
The Committee
shall work in close coordination with other Faculty Senate Policy Committees and
other Senate and University committees/subcommittees in the performance of its
duties.
B)
Issues considered
by the
committee may be referred as well by the Executive Committee to
any of the other committees of the Faculty Senate. The committee may similarly refer issues to
other Senate committees through the Executive Committee.
C)
The Committee shall meet at least once a month at a designated time and
place.
D)
A quorum of the
Committee shall require the presence of at least six voting members. The Committee shall not act in the absence of
a quorum.
E)
Committee meetings shall be open to the university community.
F)
The meeting
agenda and supporting documentation shall be distributed to Committee members
at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.
G) Committtee agendas shall normally be
published and made accessable to the campus community at least 72 hours prior
to the meeting. Minutes shall also be
published and made accessable to the campus community in a timely manner.
Carried.
FS 11/12-149/APC/EX YEAR-END REPORT - ACADEMIC
POLICY COMMITTEE
The
Faculty Senate receives the attached end of the year-end report from
of the
Academic
Policy Committee and thanks and commends the committee and
its chair
for their work.
2011-2012
Year-End Report Attachment
U
followed
by
2010-2011
Year-End Report Attachment
U-1
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-153/CPC/EX PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT –
PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY
The
Faculty Senate recommends that:
1.
The Bachelor of
Arts degree in Physics be approved for six years or until the next program
review.
2.
The Bachelor of
Science degree in Physics be approved for six years or until the next program
review.
3.
The Bachelor of
Arts in Physical Science be approved for six years or until the next program
review.
4.
The Singel
Subject Teaching Credential in Physics be approved for six years or until the
next program review.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-154/FPC/EX YEAR-END REPORT – FACULTY
POLICIES COMMITTEE
The
Faculty Senate receives the year-end report from the
Faculty Policies
Committee and thanks and commends the committee and its
chair for
their work. Attachment
BB
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-155/CPC/EX YEAR-END REPORT –
CURRICULUM POLICIES COMMITTEE
The
Faculty Senate receives the year-end report from the
Curriculum
Policy Committee and thanks and commends the committee and its
chair for
their work. Attachment
CC
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-156/GE-GRPC/EX YEAR-END REPORT – GENERAL
EDUCATION/GRADUATION
REQUIREMENTS POLICIES COMMITTEE
The
Faculty Senate receives the year-end report from the
Curriculum
Policy Committee and thanks and commends the committee and its
chair for
their work. Attachment
DD
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-159/GSPC/EX YEAR END REPORT – GRADUATE
STUDIES POLICIES COMMITTEE
The
Faculty Senate receives the year-end report from the
Graduate
Studies Policies Committee and thanks and commends the committee
and its chair
for their work. Attachment
EE
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-157/CC COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS – SENATE
Livingston
Annual Faculty Lecture Committee
Julie
Figueroa, 2015
Elections
Committee
Tim
Ford
Faculty
Endowment for Student Scholarship Committee
Julie
Thomas, 2015
Patrick
Cannon, 2015
Curriculum
Policies Committee
Dian
Baker, 2015
Graduate
Studies Policies Committee
Kenneth
Sprott, 2015
Genie
Cowan, 2015
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-160/EX COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENTS – UNIVERSITY
Grade
Appeal Panels Pool
The Faculty
Senate recommends appointment of the following faculty members to
the Grade
Appeal Panels Pool:
Jim
Wanket
Edith LeFebvre
Elisabeth
Liles
Susan
Baker
Adam
Rechs
Vahl
Scott Gordon
James
Miranda
Mark
Rodriguez
John
LaRocco
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-161/Flr. COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENTS - UNIVERSITY
University
Budget Advisory Committee
The Faculty Senate recommends
appointment of one of the following faculty
members to the
University Budget Advisory Committee.
Mike McKeough
Kristen Van Gaasbeck
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-131/APC/EX ACADEMIC CALENDARS,
2013-2014 and 2014-2015
The Faculty
Senate recommends adoption of the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015
academic
calendars as they appear in the following attachments.
The Faculty
Senate further recommends that the President solicits
feedback from
the Associated Students, Inc., the University Staff Assembly,
and the Alumni
Association specifically on the question of
holding
commencement on Sundays.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-138/APC/EX GRADE APPEALS POLICY, REVISION TO
The
Faculty Senate recommends revisions to the Grade Appeals Policy as indicated in
the following attachments.
Attachment A: Student Grade Appeal Policy
Attachment
A-1: Student Grade
Appeal Form
Background information is provided in Attachment
A-2
The Faculty Senate further recommends an interim
addition to the grade appeals policy, for one academic year, by adding to
Section VII.C.2.e, a second and subsequent paragraphs as follows:
Conceivably in an extraordinary case a
formal grade appeal may be filed during a summer recess which, in the judgment
of the Provost’s designee, requires consideration and decision by a grade
appeal panel before the beginning of the subsequent Fall term. In such an extraordinary case, the Provost’s
designee may convene an existing panel to consider and decide it or form a
panel under this Process from among the faculty members and students who
have served on a panel during the previous academic year or who have been
recommended previously by the Faculty Senate in the case of faculty members and
the A.S.I. in the case of student members.
A panel convened under this section
shall proceed by written submissions of the parties as provided elsewhere
herein. The panel shall afford to each
party adequate time to prepare his or her written submissions, but the panel
may reduce each part’s time for preparation to less than that prescribed in the
case of grade appeals filed during the Fall and Spring terms in order to meet
the necessities defining an extraordinary summer grade appeal. A panel’s decision to reduce the amount of
time to prepare an initial submission to the panel shall apply alike to both
the student and the instructor. The time
allowed to the student to prepare a response or rebuttal to the instructor’s
submission shall be limited to one-half of the period allowed by the panel for
preparation of the parties’ initial written submissions.
The written decision of the panel shall
conform to the requirements set forth in Section VII.C.6.e (1)-(3) of this
document.
Carried
unanimously.
FS
11/12-138A/APC/EX/Flr GRADE APPEALS POLICY, MOTION TO REFER
SPECIFIC CONTENT OF FS 11/12-138/APC/EX T TO APC
The Faculty Senate refers the Grade Appeals Policy to the Academic
Policies Committee specifically with regards to the
interim policy recommendation in Section VII.C.2.e that defines summer
grade appeals. APC is asked to provide
language for a possible subsequent revision that might:
1. Provide clarification of the types of cases that would
be considered extraordinary (as in Section VII.C.2.e.).
2. Include a provision to ensure due process for faculty members
who are unavailable in the summer.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11-12/132/FPC/APC/EX FACULTY AND STUDENT RIGHTS AND
RESPONSIBILITIES
The Faculty Senate recommends adoption of the following faculty and student policies:
§ Academic Freedom and Responsibility Attachment N
§ Faculty Responsibilities and Professional Ethics Attachment O
§ Faculty Responsibilities to Students in the
Instructional Environment Attachment P
§ Student Rights and Responsibilities Attachment Q
Carried.
FS 11-12/101/SEL: STANDING RULES:
AMENDS THE MEMBERSHIP AND CHARGE OF THE
ACADEMIC POLICIES COMMITTEE;
REMOVES RESPONSIBILITY FOR
THE
ACADEMIC CALENDAR FROM THIS COMMITTEE; AND CREATES
A STUDENT RETENTION AND GRADUATION SUBCOMMITTEE; ALL
TO
BE EFFECTIVE
IN
2012-2013.
Amends FS 09-11A/Ex and AS 94-98B.
The Faculty Senate amends the membership
and charge of the Academic Policies Committee,
removes responsibility for the academic calendar from this committee,
and creates a
Student Retention
and Graduation
Subcommittee (SRGS) with
a reporting relationship to the SAPC. The Faculty Senate shall appoint the membership of the new
SRGS subcommittee in Fall 2012
and the subcommittee shall commences its work as
soon as possible thereafter. The
Academic
Policies
Committee
shall be a
standing Policy Committee whose Chair shall be an
ex-officio voting member of the Executive
Committee and an
ex-officio non-voting
member of the Faculty Senate, unless concurrently serving as the
elected representative his or her department/unit.
ACADEMIC
POLICY COMMITTEE
Charge: The Academic Policies Committee,
a standing Policy Committee of the Faculty Senate, acts as a consultative and deliberative body of the Faculty Senate. The Committee is responsible for the development, review and revision of policies related to and
affecting student progress
to degree (both
undergraduate and
graduate) or to program completion. Accordingly,
the
Committee has oversight with
respect to a wide range of policies that govern the nexus between the University’s
Academic Affairs and
Student Affairs Divisions. The Committee’s purview includes,
but
is not limited to,
reviewing and
making recommendations on
policies pertaining to: admission standards,
student academic standing (i.e., definitions of good standing,
probation,
continued Probation,
disqualification, dismissal,
reinstatement and
readmission after dismissal); student honors and awards; satisfactory
progress standards; definition of grading symbols; add,
drop, and repeat policies; academic honesty, policies and
procedures; academic program access for students with disabilities; student grade appeal policy and
process; student grievance procedures; student rights and
responsibilities; student academic advising policies; enrollment management policies (e.g., registration limitations); and academic support programs and
programs/initiatives designed to improve student retention and graduation
rates. The Committee shall supervise generally the work of its subcommittees and
may
refer, remove or receive
from
them matters that require reconsideration of policies pertaining to
Student Affairs.
Membership:
Voting
members shall include: 11 faculty members appointed by the Faculty Senate to
a three year term,
including one faculty member from the Library or Student Services Professionals- Academically Related units, and ten
College-based faculty members.
More than one member may be
from
a single college but no two members may be from the same department/unit. Every effort shall be
made
to encourage membership from each college.
Non-voting
members shall include:
• one staff member appointed
by the University Staff Assembly to a two year term;
• one undergraduate student appointed by ASI to
a one year term;
• one graduate student appointed
by ASI to
a one year term;
• ex-officio members of the administration
as
determined by the Executive Committee and the
President, and
which
shall normally include incumbents or designees of the following offices or
their equivalents: Associate Vice President for Student Affairs, Enrollment and Student Support; Associate Vice President, Student Retention and Academic Success;
Associate Dean
of Undergraduate Studies; University Registrar; Director, Academic Advising Center and
Career
Center; and may include others as deemed
necessary to
the
work of the Committee;
• Faculty Senate Chair.
Officers:
Election
and Role of Chair
A) The Chair shall be elected annually by the Faculty Senate as described in the By-Laws of the Faculty Senate. The Committee Chair shall be included among the 11 voting members
of the
Committee.
B) The term of office of the Academic Policies Committee Chair shall be one
year.
The term shall begin at noon on the last day of the spring semester in
which s/he is elected
the Committee
Chair and shall end
at
noon on the last day of the spring
semester of the following year.
C) A faculty member may be elected to serve up to three consecutive terms of one year each as the
Chair of the Academic
Policies Committee.
After an interval of a year
following the end of the third
consecutive term, the faculty member shall become eligible again for election to
the
Chair of the Committee.
D) The Academic Policies Committee
Chair shall also
serve as an ex-officio non-voting member of the Faculty Senate,
unless concurrently serving as
the elected
representative his or her department/unit.
E) The Academic
Policies
Committee Chair shall also
serve as an ex-officio
voting
member of the Executive Committee.
Election
and Role of Vice-Chair(s)
At its first meeting of the academic year, the Academic
Policies Committee shall elect, from among its membership, a Vice-Chair. The Vice-Chair shall serve as acting chair in the
absence of the Chair.
Committees/Subcommittees that report to the Academic Policies
Committee:
•
Academic Standards Subcommittee
•
Readmission Subcommittee
•
Student Retention and Graduation
Subcommittee
•
Faculty Endowment for Student Scholarships Committee
Liaisons to Subcommittees:
The Committee shall appoint one of its voting
members to serve as liaison
between
itself and each
of the
committees/subcommittees identified
above.
Operations:
A) The Committee shall work in close coordination
with other Faculty Senate Policy Committees and other Senate and University committees/subcommittees in
the
performance of its duties.
B) Issues considered
by the Academic Policies
Committee may be referred as well by the Executive Committee to any of the other committees of the Faculty Senate. The
Committee may similarly refer issues to other Senate committees through
the
Executive Committee.
C) The Committee shall meet at least once a month at a designated time and
place.
D) A quorum of the Committee shall require the presence of at least six
voting members. The Committee shall not act in the absence of a quorum.
E)
Committee meetings shall be open to the university community.
F) The meeting agenda and supporting documentation shall be distributed
to Committee members at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.
G) Committee agendas shall normally be published and made accessable to the campus community at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Minutes shall also be published and made
accessible to the campus community in a timely manner.
Carried.
FS 11-12/102/SEL STANDING RULES: MEMBERSHIP AND CHARGE OF THE STUDENT RETENTION AND
GRADUATION SUBCOMMITTEE
OF THE
ACADEMIC
POLICIES COMMITTEE, EFFECTIVE
AY 2012-2013
.
Amends FS
09-11A/Ex and AS
94-98B.
The Faculty Senate approves the membership and charge of the Student Retention and Graduation
Subcommittee of the Academic
Policies Committee as
described below,
to become effective AY 2012-2013. The Faculty Senate shall
appoint the membership
of
the new subcommittee in Fall 2012 to ensure that the
subcommittee is in place to conduct regular business in AY 2013-2014
2012-
2013.
STUDENT
RETENTION AND
GRADUATION SUBCOMMITTEE
Charge: The Student Retention
and Graduation
Subcommittee is a subcommittee of the Academic
Policies Committee. The Subcommittee serves as a research, program evaluation, and
policy analysis workgroup
and consultative/advisory body on
matters relating
student progress toward degree, student support programs,
and instructional programs/initiatives
designed to improve retention
and graduation rates.
Accordingly,
the
Subcommittee’s responsibilities include, but are not limited to: on-going review of student progress data in
collaboration
with the Office of Institutional Research, assessment of the impact of policies relating to and
affecting student progress to degree, conducting evaluations of academic support
programs,
academic advising and student support services,
and conducting assessments of instructional programs/initiatives designed
to
improve retention and
graduation rates. Although
not a “policy committee,” per se, the Subcommittee works closely with the
Academic Policies
Committee and
the
Office of Institutional Research in
policy development,
review and evaluation. Similarly,
although the Subcommittee is not directly involved in the
delivery of academic advising,
academic support programs,
student support services or instructional programs/initiatives designed
to
improve retention and
graduation, it is responsible
for
consulting with and
making recommendations to the units involved
in
these matters.
Membership:
Voting
members shall include: Seven college-based
faculty
members appointed by the Faculty Senate to three year terms and four student services professionals appointed
by Vice-President for
Student Affairs, also appointed to three year terms.
More than one faculty member may be from a single college but no two members may be from the same department/unit. Every effort shall
be made to encourage membership from each college. In
addition, every effort should
be
made to appoint student services professionals with direct and substantial student contact in
different units
in Student Affairs.
Non-voting
members shall include:
• one member of the Academic Policies Committee serving in the capacity as liaison
between the Subcommittee and the Academic
Policies
Committee;
• one undergraduate student appointed by ASI to
a one year term;
• ex-officio members of the administration
as
determined by the Executive Committee and the President,
and which
shall normally include incumbents or designees of the
following offices or their equivalents: Associate Vice President for Student Affairs, Enrollment and
Student Support; Associate Vice President, Student Retention and Academic Success;
Associate Dean of Undergraduate Students; Director of the Office of Institutional Research; and
may
include others as deemed necessary to
the
work of the Subcommittee;
• Chair of the
Academic Policies Committee.
Officers: The Subcommittee shall elect a Chair and Vice-Chair by and from the voting membership
of
the Subcommittee.
Operations:
H) The subcommittee is charged
to develop its own agenda relating to the scope of its
responsibilities, to
conduct work referred to it by the Academic
Policies
Committee, and to respond
to requests for consultation/advice from individuals/units on matters within its purview.
I) The Subcommittee may similarly refer issues to
other Senate or University Committees or administrative units in
Academic Affairs or Student Affairs through
the Student Affairs Policy
Academic Policies Committee.
J) The Subcommittee shall meet at least once a month at a designated time and
place.
K) A quorum of the Subcommittee shall require the presence of at least six voting members. The Committee shall not act in the absence of a quorum.
L)
Subcommittee meetings shall be open
to the university community.
M) The meeting agenda and supporting documentation
shall be distributed to
Subcommittee members,
including all non-voting members, and to the Faculty Senate Secretary at least 72
hours prior to the meeting.
N) Subcommittee Minutes of meetings shall be distributed to
Subcommittee members,
including all non-voting
members,
and to the Faculty Senate Secretary in
a timely manner.
Carried.
FS 11-12/103/SEL: STANDING RULES: AMENDS THE MEMBERSHIP AND CHARGE OF THE FACULTY POLICIES COMMITTEE, TO BE EFFECTIVE
IN AY
2012-2013
Amends/rescinds FS
09-11C/Ex and AS
94-98C
The Faculty Senate amends the membership and charge of the Faculty Policies Committee (FPC)
as shown below to be effective 2012-2013.
Faculty Policies Committee
Charge:
The Faculty Policies Committee, a standing Policy Committee of
the
Faculty Senate, acts as a consultative and deliberative body
of the Faculty Senate. The Committee is
responsible for the development, review and revision of
policies related to and affecting faculty pertaining to the areas of professional development, professional standards, faculty awards, workload, retention, academic freedom not related to course content, research and creative activities, the
academic calendar2, and other faculty matters outside the purview of the collective bargaining unit and the UARTP Committee that are deemed necessary by the
Executive Committee of
the
Faculty Senate. The Committee shall supervise generally the work of its subcommittees and may refer, remove or receive from them matters that require
reconsideration of policies pertaining to Faculty Affairs.
Membership:
Voting members shall include: 11 faculty members appointed by the Faculty Senate to a three year term, including one faculty member from the Library or Student Services Professionals-
Academically Related units; and ten College-based faculty members. More than one member
may be from a single college but
no
two members may be from the same department/unit. Every effort shall be made to encourage membership from each college.
Non-voting members shall include:
- one staff member appointed by
the University Staff Assembly to a two year term;
- one student appointed by ASI to a one year term;
Officers:
Election and Role of Chair
A) The Chair
shall be elected annually by the Faculty Senate as described in the By-Laws of the Faculty Senate. The Committee Chair shall be included among the 11 voting members of
the
committee.
B) The term of
office of the Faculty Policies Committee Chair shall be one year. The term shall begin
at noon on
the
last
day of the
spring semester in which
s/he is elected the Committee Chair and
shall end at noon on the last day
of the spring semester of the following year.
C) A faculty member may be elected to serve up to three consecutive terms of one year each as the Chair of the Policies Committee. After an interval of a year following the end of
the
third consecutive term, the faculty member shall become
eligible again for election to the Chair
of the Committee.
D) The Faculty Policies
Committee Chair shall also serve as an
ex-officio non-
voting member of
the
Faculty Senate, unless concurrently serving as the direct representative his or her department/unit.
E) The Faculty Policies Committee Chair
shall also serve as an ex-officio voting member of the Executive Committee.
Election and Role of Vice Chair(s)
At its first meeting of
the academic year, the Faculty Policies Committee shall elect, from among its membership, a Vice Chair. The Vice Chair shall serve as acting chair in
the
absence of the Chair.
Committees/Subcommittees that report to
or
are overseen by the Faculty Policy Committee:
• Pedagogy Enhancement Awards Subcommittee (PEAS)
• Research and Creative Activities Award Subcommittee
The list of committees/subcommittees reporting to or overseen by the Faculty Affairs Policy Committee is expanded beyond the list previously reporting to/overseen by the previous Faculty Affairs Committee (adds the Lifetime Achievement Award Selection Committee
and the Livingston Faculty Address Committee). Charges of the added committees/subcommittees will have to
be
amended to reflect these changes.
• Visiting Scholars Subcommittee
• Lifetime Achievement Award Selection Committee
• Livingston Annual Faculty Address Committee
Liaisons to
Committees/Subcommittees:
The Committee shall appoint one voting member of the Faculty Policies Committee to
serve as liaison
between itself and each of the following subcommittees:
• Pedagogy Enhancement Awards Subcommittee (PEAS)
• Research and Creative Activities Award Subcommittee
• Visiting Scholars Committee
In addition, the
Faculty Policies Committee shall appoint one of its members to serve Center for
Teaching and Learning Advisory Board.
Operations:
A)
The Committee shall work in close coordination with other Faculty Senate Policy Committees and other Senate and University committees/subcommittees in
the performance of
its
duties.
B) Issues considered by the Faculty Policies Committee may be referred as
well by
the Executive Committee to any
of the other committees of the Faculty Senate. The Committee may similarly refer issues to other Senate
committees through the Executive Committee.
C) The Faculty Policies Committee shall meet at least once a month at a
designated time and place.
D) A quorum of the Committee shall require the presence of at least six voting members.
The Committee shall not act in the absence of a quorum.
E) Committee meetings shall be open to the university community.
F) The meeting agenda and supporting documentation shall be distributed to Committee members at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.
G) Committee agendas shall normally be published
and
made accessable to the campus community at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.
Minutes shall also be published and made
accessible to the campus community in a timely manner.
Carried.
FS 11/12-162B/Flr. POSTPONEMENT OF FS 11/12- 162/Flr.
The
Faculty Senate postpones consideration of FS 11/12-162/Flr. and all pending
amendments until fall 2012.
Carried.
FS 11/12-162/Flr. STANDING
RULES: STANDING POLICY COMMITTEES WITH
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERSHIP ON THE FACULTY SENATE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND THE FACULTY SENATE.
Beginning in Fall 2013, the Academic Policies
Committee, the Faculty Policies Committee, and the Curriculum Policies
Committee and the Graduate Studies Policies Committee shall be the only selected
standing Policy Committees whose Chairs are designated as ex-officio voting
members of the Faculty Senate Executive Committee and as ex-officio non-voting
members of the faculty Senate, unless concurrently serving as the elected
representative of his or her department/unit.
If any of the charges of these committees do not currently reflect this,
they shall be amended accordingly. If
the charge of any other committee currently specifies that the Committee Chair
serves as an ex-officio member of the Faculty Senate or its Executive
Committee, the charge shall be amended accordingly. The Chairs of the selected standing Policy
Committees identified herein whose Chairs shall serve as ex-officio members of
the Executive Committee and the Faculty Senate shall be nominated and elected
in accordance with procedures set forth in the By-Laws of the Faculty
Senate. In addition, although the
General Education/Graduation Requirements Committee shall not be among the
standing Policy Committees whose Chairs hold ex-officio members of the Faculty
Senate and the Executive Committee, the Chairs of these Committees shall be
nominated and elected by the same procedures as the Chairs of the selected
committees.
Rationale:
In
FS 11/12-85/SEL, the Senate amended the By-Laws to deleted the names
of Senate Policy committees as the standing Policy committees whose chairs
would be ex-officio members of the Executive Committee and the Senate, and
instead provided that the Chairs of certain standing Policy committees as specified in the standing
Policy Committee’s charge would be the ones with membership. In addition, the Senate, in FS 11/12-87/SEL: approved the following:
The Faculty
Senate approves that, for the 2012-13
Academic Year, the Chairs of the following Policy Committees shall be specified
as ex-officio voting members of Faculty Senate Executive Committee: Academic
Policies Committee, Curriculum Policies Committee, Faculty Policies Committee,
General Education and Graduation Requirements Policy Committee, and Graduate
Studies Policy Committee.
Therefore, the Senate must affirmatively select the
Committees and declare in standing Policy Committee’s charge, whether the
committee chair shall be a member of the Senate and the Executive Committee.
One of the major objectives of the recommendations of
the Wankett Select Committee was to reduce the number of Committee Chairs on
the Executive Committee and increase the number of at-large members. This motion would accomplish this.
The motion proposes that the number of Committee
Chairs be reduced from 5 to 3, which would allow for increasing of at-large
members from 4 to 6. Given the large and
broad scope of the charges of the Academic Policies, Faculty Policies and
Curriculum Policies Committee, the motion proposes that these be the three
selected committees. In contrast, the
charges of GSPC and GE/GR are more limited in scope.
SEL/Flr. MOTION TO TABLE FS
11/12-105/SEL. STANDING RULES: MEMBERSHIP AND CHARGE OF THE GRADUATE
PROGRAMS SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICY
COMMITTEE, EFFECTIVE AY 2013-2014.
Carried
unanimously.
SEL/Flr. MOTION TO TABLE FS 11/12-106/SEL. STANDING RULES: FACULTY SENATE COMMITTEE
ORGANIZATIONAL
CHART, EFFECTIVE AY 2013-2014.
Carried
unanimously.
FS 11/12-107/SEL MOTION TO DISCHARGE THE SELECT COMMITTEE 2011-2012
AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
The Faculty Senate discharges the Select Committee
2011-2012 created by FS 11-60/Ex
from further consideration of the reorganization of
the appointed standing policy
committees of the Faculty Senate and the several
committees and subcommittees
reporting to them.
The Faculty Senate directs the
Senate Executive Committee to see to the revision of the
charges of the several committees
and subcommittees reporting to the Senate's
appointed standing policy
committees to reflect the action taken by the Senate
in response to the recommendations
of the Select Committee 2011-2012.
The Faculty Senate thanks the
members of the Select Committee 2011-2012 for
their service.
Carried.
FS 11/12-140A/EX MOTION TO REFER FS 11/12-140/EX TO THE
2012-2013 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
The Faculty
Senate refers FS 11/12-140/EX to the 2012-2013 Executive Committee to consider
and possibly incorporate
suggested amendments into an interim policy recommendation.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-140/
/EX FIELD
TRIP POLICY, ESTABLISHMENT OF
The Faculty
Senate endorses the creation as the policy described in Attachment NN.
FS 11/12-141A/EX MOTION TO REFER FS 11/12-141/EX TO THE
2012-2013 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
The
Faculty Senate refers FS 11/12-141/EX to the 2012-2013 Executive Committee to
consider
and possibly
incorporate suggested amendments into an interim policy recommendation.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11/12-141
EX INTERNSHIP
POLICY, ESTABLISHMENT OF
The Faculty
Senate endorses the creation of the policy described in Attachment O.
CPC/EX MOTION
TO REFER FS 11/12-114/CPC/EX TO THE 2012-2013 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
The Faculty Senate refers FS 11/12-114/CPC/EX to the 2012-2013 Executive
Committee.
Carried unanimously.
FS
11/12-114/
CPC/EX PROGRAM PROPOSAL – MA IN
HUMANITIES
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the MA in Humanities Program
Proposal
FS 11/12-152/Flr. COMMENDATION
FOR ANTHONY G. SHEPPARD
WHEREAS: Dr.
Sheppard once remarked that, “If people think I speak too
frequently at
Faculty Senate meetings they should elect me
Senate Chair;
that way I won’t be able to talk as much;” and
WHEREAS: The Faculty Senate did just
that; and
WHEREAS: As
Senate Chair, Dr. Sheppard nonetheless continued to speak
quite a bit,
but he has done so with sophistication and wit, deftly
dealing with
both complex issues and flamboyant personalities;
and
WHEREAS: Under
Dr. Sheppard’s leadership shared governance and
collegiality
on the Sacramento State campus has thrived; and
WHEREAS: Dr.
Sheppard has been known to sip an amber glass of
liquid – which
he claims is mango juice – that
somehow
greatly
improves his ability to manage Executive Committee
meetings; and
WHEREAS: Dr.
Sheppard’s position of leadership in the Sacramento film
community
reflects positively on our own institution, and
WHEREAS: The
sound of Dr. Sheppard’s accent coming from the podium
will surely be
missed; be it therefore
RESOLVED: That
all good things must come to an end; therefore be it further
RESOLVED: That the Faculty Senate looks
forward to Dr. Sheppard returning
to its ranks
as a Senator, and anticipates arguments featuring
such apt
analogies as grand pianos in living rooms as compared
with Senate
structures; therefore be it further
RESOLVED: That the Faculty Senate thanks
Anthony G. Sheppard for his
three years of
excellent leadership as Senate Chair and wishes
him all the best
in any future endeavors he may undertake,
whether at
Sacramento State or in the world at large.
Carried
unanimously.
[1] The
Academic Affairs Policy Committee established herein combines the
policy-related charges of the following Policy Committees: Curriculum Policies
Committee (established or amended by FS 09-11B and AS 94-98A), Graduate Studies
Policy Committee (established or amended by FS 08-54, FS 08-65 and FS 09-10),
and the GE/Graduation Requirements Policy Committee (established or amended by
FS 09-11D and AS 94-98A.1 .
[2] The Course and Program Proposal Review Subcommittee
included here renames the Subcommittee
for Curriculum of the Curriculum Policies Committee established by AS 06-87.
[3] The Graduate Program Subcommittee included here can be
viewed as either a newly established operational/advisory subcommittee of the
Academic Affairs Policy Committee or a revision of the Graduate Studies Policy
Committee from a standing Policy Committee to a subcommittee of AAPC with a
revised charge. An action item relating to the Graduate Program Subcommittee is
submitted separately in FS 11/12-105/SEL
[4] These rules are derived from the part of the charge of each current standing Policy Committee referring to operations.