2005-2006
FACULTY SENATE
California State University, Sacramento
AGENDA
Thursday, November 10, 2005
Forest Suite, 2nd
Floor, University Union
3:00 - 5:00 p.m.
CONSENT CALENDAR
CONSENT ACTION
FS 05-62/Ex. | COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS - UNIVERSITY |
Bookstore Advisory Group
Joyce Bishop, SS&IS, 2007
Tony Sheppard, H&HS, 2008Committee for Persons with Disabilities
Brian Baker, SS&IS, 2006Search Committee, Dean, College of Education
Robin Carter, H&HS
FS 05-63/CPC/Ex. | PROGRAM CHANGE PROPOSALS |
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the program change proposals found at Attachment A.
REGULAR AGENDA
FS 05-64/Flr. | APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 27, 2005 |
FS 05-65/Flr. | NOMINATION OF FACULTY REPRESENTATIVES TO THE STRATEGIC PLANNING COUNCIL |
Background: At the October 27 Faculty Senate meeting, Chair Jensen advised the Senate that the Council for University Planning will be replaced by the Strategic Planning Council. The composition calls for: the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs; one representative each from the offices of the Vice Presidents for Administration, Human Resources, Student Affairs and University Advancement; the Chair of the Faculty Senate; two other faculty representatives, chosen from the Faculty Senate; one chair of an academic department, chosen by the Provost; one staff member, recommended through a campus-wide nomination process; ASI president or designee; one community member appointed by the President from a list prepared by the Vice President for University. Election of the two faculty representatives will be held on Thursday, November 17, 2005.
The Faculty Senate nominates candidates for two (2) faculty representatives to serve on the Strategic Planning Council.
SECOND READING
additions = underscore; deletions = strikethrough
*FS 05-55/Ex./Flr. | NEW DOCTORAL AUTHORITY FOR CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO AND ASSOCIATED IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES, RESOLUTION ON |
WHEREAS, SB 724 authorizes the CSU to offer a doctoral degreeDoctor of Education (Ed.D.)in Education, broadly defined as leadership for community colleges and K-12 administratorsfocused on preparing administrative leaders for California public elementary and secondary schools and community colleges and on the knowledge and skills needed by administrators to be effective leaders in California public schools and community colleges;
WHEREAS, This new and exciting opportunity has received faculty support;
WHEREAS, This may be the first of multiple, related program development opportunities at the doctoral level, and is unlike any program prior;
WHEREAS, California State University, Sacramento has, subject to campus, system-wide and legislative guidelines, well established policies and precedent for faculty-driven curriculum and program development;
WHEREAS, The Senate recognizes the urgency necessary to and involved in the development of the Ed.D; therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Faculty Senate will support the development of such a curriculum in keeping with the existing policies regarding new programs;
RESOLVED, That the Faculty Senate will support the expediency needed in moving these policies forward and, with faculty input, amending them as may be necessary for programs of this nature; and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Faculty Senate, in the spirit of interdisciplinary, collaborative, and innovative curriculum development will support the involvement of all interested faculties on campus in the development of this exciting and entirely new program; and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Faculty Senate authorizes the Chair to form an ad hoc committee comprised of faculty with appropriate and demonstrated curriculum policy experience to develop, for Senate curricular review purposes, the necessary areas to be addressed in a doctoral proposal quality parametersidentified, but not limited to those, below:
- quality parameters
- faculty doctoral program workload
- qualifications for doctoral faculty
- nature of culminating project, qualifying examinations
appropriate use of part-time faculty- resource parameters per FTES
- fee structure
- guidelines for use of technology
SB 724 can be accessed at:
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0701-0750/sb_724_bill_20050922_chaptered.pdf
FS 05-53/Ex. | INFORMATION COMPETENCY IMPLEMENTATION, RESOLUTION ON |
WHEREAS, The Faculty Senate adopted a policy(FS-04-67, December 9, 2004) revising the University’s Computer Literacy/Information Competence State and Requirements and reframing it as the Information Competence Graduation Requirement with learning goals that include the development of the following skills:
- Determine the extent of the information needed.
- Access needed information effectively and efficiently.
- Evaluate information and its sources critically and use appropriately and effectively.
- Use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose.
- Understand the issues associated with legal and ethical access to and use of information.
WHEREAS, The policy change was enacted without precise implementation language; therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Faculty Senate adopts the implementation policy recommended by the General Education/Graduation Requirements Committee which includes the following elements:
- While programs may certainly use the statement of these competencies to examine and reorganize aspects of their curricula they are not required to do so if in the faculty's judgment all competencies are covered in their present curricula.
- Programs are expected to develop during the AY 2005-2006 a statement that addresses each of the five specified components. For each there should be:
- a brief statement of how the program or discipline uses this competency
- identification of course(s) in which each competency is principally introduced along with an example of an assignment for each competency
- a brief statement on how student demonstration of competencies is measured.
- A department/program with multiple degree programs may development a single statement for more than one program if the competencies apply similarly to two or more degrees.
- These initial statements are due for review no later than April1, 2006.
- An ad hoc committee established by the GE committee will review the statements and report back suggestions to programs.
- Formal submission as well as formal evaluation will be part of normal program review beginning in 2006-2007.
INFORMATION
Upcoming Senate meetings:
- November 17, 2005 - Senate meets
- December 1, 2005 - tentative
- December 8, 2005 - Senate meets
- December 15, 2005 - tentative