2010-2011 FACULTY SENATE
California State University, Sacramento
MINUTES
Thursday, April 7, 2011
Foothill Suite, Union
Present: |
Altmann, Nursing; Barrena, Biological Sciences; Bogazianos, Criminal Justice; Boulgarides, Temporary Faculty (Kinesiology and Health Science); Buckley, ASCSU Senator (Computer Science); Buono, Student Services; Carle, Foreign Languages; Choi, Business Administration; Deegan, Temporary Faculty (Family and Consumer Science); Diaz, Kinesiology and Health Science; W. Dillon, Government; Domokos, Mathematics and Statistics; Fanetti, English; Flohr, Art; Gardner, Business Administration; Gibbs, Design; Gonsier-Gerdin, Special Education, Rehabilitation, School Psychology, and Deaf Studies; Hadley, Sociology; Hamilton, Mathematics and Statistics; Hammersley, Geology; Heedley, Electrical and Electronic Engineering; Henderson, Counselor Education; Gherman, Chemistry; Katz, Learning Skills; Kelly, Social Work; Kirlin, Public Policy and Administration; Koegel, Communication Studies; Krabacher, ASCSU Senator (Geography); Li, Business Administration; Marbach, Mechanical Engineering; McCurley, Student Services; McKeough, Physical Therapy; Metz, Music; Mikhailitchenko, Business Administration; Miller, GSPC Chair and ASCSU Senator (Communication Studies); Moylan, Family and Consumer Sciences; Noel, FPC Chair (Teacher Education); Numark, History; Peigahi, Library; Penrod, Psychology; Piloyan, Associated Students, Inc.; Pinch, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration; Reddick, Library; Russell, Social Work; Sheppard, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration; C. Smith, ASI; V. Smith, Communication Studies; Stevens, Environmental Studies; Strasser, Anthropology; Taylor, Physics and Astronomy; Theodorides, Kinesiology and Health Science; Van Gaasbeck, APC Chair (Economics); Wanket, Geography |
Absent: |
Baker, Ethnic Studies; Berta-Avila, Bilingual/Multicultural Education; Blanton, Speech Pathology and Audiology; Buckman, Humanities; Chavez, Educational Leadership and Policy Studies; Croisdale, Criminal Justice; Dixon, Temporary Faculty (Music); Echandia, Temporary Faculty (Bilingual/Multicultural Education); Fell, Civil Engineering; Hecsh, Teacher Education; Kaplan, Economics; Liu, Business Administration; Loeza, Teacher Education; McCormick, Philosophy; Melzer, English; Moni, Women's Studies; Parsh, Nursing; Raskauskas, Child Development; vacant, Theatre and Dance; vacant, Athletics |
MOMENT OF SILENCE
ROGER LEEZER Faculty, Mathematics JAMES BOSCO Emeritus Faculty, Kinesiology and Health Science RAGNOR SEGLUND Emeritus Faculty, Accountancy ARLENE SASSE Student |
(BILL) CHARLES LOVITT Emeritus Faculty, Philosophy HAROLD KERSTER Emeritus Faculty, Environmental Studies FRED JOYCE Emeritus Faculty, Business |
The agenda was amended by adding FS 11-44 “Motion to Reconsider FS 10-71 ‘Policy on Instructional Program Priorities: Academic Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management, Amendment of’ “.
ACTION ITEMS
FS 11-35/PROC/Ex. |
ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW – DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND CONSUMER SCIENCES |
The Faculty Senate receives the recommendations (Attachment A) of the Program Review Oversight Committee and recommends approval of all of the Department’s degree programs for six years.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11-36/PROC/Ex. |
ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW – DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY |
The Faculty Senate receives the recommendations (Attachment B) of the Program Review Oversight Committee and recommends (1) provisional approval of all of the Department’s degree programs for three years pending development and implementation of a workable student learning outcomes assessment plan that satisfies both University and WASC requirements, and (2) upon successfully development and approval of such a plan by Academic Affairs, the Program shall be approved for the remainder of the six years or until the next program review.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11-37/CPC/Ex. |
PROGRAM PROPOSALS |
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following program proposals:
A. Education Specialist Credential Program: Mild/Moderate (Attachment C-1)
B. Education Specialist Credential Program: Mild/Moderate Multiple Subject (Attachment C-2)
C. Preliminary Education Specialist Teaching Credential Program: Early Childhood Special Education (Attachment C-3)
D. Moderate/Severe Education Specialist (Attachment C-4)
E. Multiple Subject Teaching Credential in the EDS Dual Program (Moderate/Severe Education Specialist and Multiple Subject Credentials) (Attachment C-5)
Carried unanimously.
FS 11-38/Flr. |
MINUTES OF MARCH 17, 2011 |
Carried unanimously.
FS 11-39/Flr. |
2011 COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES |
2011 COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES
Committee
Meeting Schedule:
#1: Thursday, April 14, 3:00-3:30 p.m., SAC 275
#2: Tuesday, April 26, 3:00-3:30 p.m., SAC 275
Committee Members:
Anthony Sheppard |
Chair, Faculty Senate |
Chris Taylor |
Vice Chair, Faculty Senate |
Jana Noel |
Member, Executive Committee (FPC Chair) |
Juanita Barrena |
Member, Executive Committee |
Kath Pinch |
Member, Executive Committee (CPC Chair) |
Noelle McCurley |
Member, Executive Committee |
Dale Russell |
Member, Executive Committee |
Janet Hecsh |
Member, Executive Committee (GE/GRPC Chair) |
Reza Peigahi |
Member, Executive Committee |
Kristin Van Gaasbeck |
Member, Executive Committee (APC Chair) |
Christine Miller |
Member, Executive Committee (GSPC Chair) |
PLUS: |
Nomination and
election of one senator from each College |
Carolyn Gibbs |
Arts and Letters |
Sharyn Gardner |
Business Administration |
Jean Gonsier-Gerdin |
Education |
Tim Marbach |
Engineering and Computer Science |
Harry Theodorides |
Health and Human Services |
Tracy Hamilton |
Natural Sciences and Mathematics |
Ann Moylan |
Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies |
FS 11-44A/Flr. |
WAIVER OF FIRST READING OF FS 11-44 |
The Faculty Senate waives the first reading of FS 11-44 “Motion to Reconsider FS 10-71 ‘Policy on Instructional Program Priorities: Academic Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management, Amendment of’ “.
Carried.
FS 11-44/Flr. |
MOTION TO RECONSIDER FS 10-71 |
The Faculty Senate recommends reconsideration of FS 10-71 “Policy on Instructional Program Priorities: Academic Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management, Amendment of”. FS 10-71 will appear on the April 21, 2011 Faculty Senate agenda.
Carried.
FS 11-27/GSPC/Ex. |
DOCTORATE IN PHYSICAL THERAPY |
The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the Doctorate in Physical Therapy, as described below:
Executive Summary
Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) Proposal
The Department of Physical Therapy in the College of Health and Human Services at Sacramento State proposes offering the Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) on the Sacramento campus beginning in fall 2012.
Rationale:
The
program is developed in response to changes in entry-level professional
education requirements by the Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy
Education (CAPTE). It is the intent of
this proposal that the new DPT curriculum will replace the MPT curriculum. MPT degrees will soon (2015) no longer meet
accreditation standards, and therefore licensing requirements. This new
DPT program will establish a pathway for CSUS students to become
graduates of an accredited program of professional physical therapist
education, and to continue to be eligible for licensure. This will advance
Program
Description:
The program is a professional doctoral
program, similar to MD and DDS programs, designed to prepare generalist
practitioners grounded in evidence-based practice in physical therapy. It consists of a combination of lecture,
laboratory, and clinical experiences over 3 years that fully integrates
evidence-based practice into these experiences through the use of case-method
teaching. A complete description of the
program as well as the design of courses by semester and summer term are included
in the full proposal in section 2 with year by year charts of the course
structure beginning on page 12. A copy
of all syllabi with assignments and sample exams accompany the Form As.
Governance
Structure:
The overall governing group of the program is the Department Council composed of members of the core and associated physical therapy faculty where all curricular and policy decisions are decided by a vote of all members. The Department is an equal and representative member of the College of Health and Human Services Committees, is represented in the Faculty Senate, and faculty serve on a variety of committees across the campus. Department faculty are fully engaged in and contributing to the activities of the campus.
Faculty:
Faculty teaching in the doctoral program and serving on doctoral committees meet all of the expectations consistent with university and CAPTE expectations. Policies and procedures are outlined in the Department’s updated Appointment, Retention, Tenure, and Promotion policies, and meet the expectations of the Chancellor’s Office governing documents.
Students:
Admissions
requirements for students entering the program will continue to require
evidence of the ability to do graduate work through careful review of
applications according to high standards.
All department requirements are iterated in the full proposal for review
in section 5 beginning on page 24. In
keeping with the
Research Capacity:
The proposed program expectation is that core doctoral faculty will have 3 units of release time each semester to devote to their scholarship. In addition they will have the responsibility of mentoring student doctoral projects/culminating experiences. Students are expected to become critical consumers of research literature and to be proficient with deriving evidence for clinical decision-making. This expectation is reinforced throughout the curriculum and with doctoral projects/culminating experiences. The department currently has space that is adequate to accommodate the research needs of faculty and students.
Internal Funding and Resources:
Internal funding resources arise from the usual sources: marginal cost funding from the state and student fees. The chart below identifies the 5 year projected budget with resultant gains expected. More complete information about this is addressed in the full proposal beginning on page 37.
|
2012-2013 |
2013-2014 |
2014-2015 |
2015-2016 |
2016-2017 |
Cohort
Enrollment # |
32 |
64 |
96 |
96 |
96 |
Personnel
Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
Program
Coordinator |
$10,350 |
$10,350 |
$10,350 |
$10,350 |
$10,350 |
Research
Associate |
|
$10,500 |
$10,500 |
$10,500 |
$10,500 |
Adm Support @ $34000 |
51,000 |
51,000 |
68,000 |
68,000 |
68,000 |
ISAs/GA |
|
10,000 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
|
$61,350 |
$81,850 |
$98,850 |
$98,850 |
$98,850 |
Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
Prog Coordinator |
4,140 |
4,140 |
4,140 |
4,140 |
4,140 |
Doctoral
Project Coordinator |
|
4,140 |
4,140 |
4,140 |
4,140 |
Adm Support |
20,400 |
20,400 |
27,200 |
27,200 |
27,200 |
ISAs/GA |
4000 |
4000 |
4000 |
4000 |
|
|
$28,540 |
$32,680 |
$39,480 |
$39,480 |
$39,480 |
Instructional
Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
776,921 |
854,921 |
1,010,921 |
1,010,921 |
1,010,921 |
Benefits |
310,768 |
341,968 |
404,368 |
404,368 |
404,368 |
|
$1,087,689 |
$1,196,889 |
$1,415,289 |
$1,415,289 |
$1,415,289 |
Library |
$35,000 |
$35,000 |
$35,000 |
$35,000 |
$35,000 |
Computers/Tech |
$2,500 |
$2,500 |
$5,000 |
$5,000 |
$5,000 |
Supplies
& Services |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplies
|
10,000 |
10,000 |
15,000 |
15,000 |
15,000 |
Photocopying
& Printing |
4,000 |
4,000 |
6,000 |
6,000 |
6,000 |
Postage |
2,000 |
2,000 |
3,000 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
Instructional
Travel |
2,000 |
2,000 |
3,000 |
3,000 |
4,000 |
|
$18,000 |
$18,000 |
$27,000 |
$28,000 |
$29,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
costs |
$1,233,079 |
$1,366,919 |
$1,620,619 |
$1,621,619 |
$1,622,619 |
Student
fees |
1,032,394 |
1,307,993 |
2,695,296 |
2,695,296 |
2,695,296 |
(33% set aside for
financial aid) |
(340,690) |
(431,637) |
(889,447) |
(889,447) |
(889,447) |
Marginal
funding |
768,042 |
863,643 |
1,088,144 |
1,088,144 |
1,088,144 |
Total
Revenue |
$1,459,746 |
$1,739,998 |
$2,893,992 |
$2,893,992 |
$2,893,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
gains |
$226,667 |
$373,079 |
$1,273,373 |
$1,272,373 |
$1,271,373 |
External Funding:
Faculty research and student internships have been supported in a variety of ways in the current graduate program. These are addressed at length in the full document.
Internal Evaluation:
The program approval process is consistent with the usual campus requirements.
External Evaluation:
The proposal has
been submitted and reviewed by an external consultant, Lisa L. Dorsey, PT, PhD,
MBA, Associate Dean of the Doisy College of Health Sciences from
The proposal’s Table
of Contents can be found at Attachment
A; the full proposal can be found at Attachment
A-1; catalog copy can be found at Attachment A-2.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11-22/Ex. |
ELECTRONIC COURSE EVALUATIONS |
Proposed changes to
UARTP policy in order to accommodate possible conversion to electronic course
evaluation.
Proposed Change in UARTP 4.08A.4:
4.08 Personnel Action File
A. The Personnel Action File shall contain the following material submitted by the custodian of the file:
1. Record of location of other files
2. Access log
3. Appointment letter and other relevant appointment
information
4. Results of standardized student evaluations standardized in terms of subject
and format of questions (e.g., numbers and types of rating items, scales, and
response categories.
Proposed Change in UARTP 5.05E.3:
E. Competent Teaching Performance
…
3) The department is responsible for the development and administration
of evaluation questionnaires, and for ensuring that administration of the questionnaires occurs in
line with established regulations and that the distribution and
collection of questionnaires maintain student anonymity. The results of
the student evaluations shall be given to the instructor and department chair
after grades have been assigned. Departments shall decide whether and under what circumstances
electronic forms may be used.
Carried.
FS 11-28/AITC/Ex. |
IMPLEMENTATION OF KBOX |
The Faculty Senate recommends an alternative approach to the monitoring and reporting needs associated with IRT’s KBox implementation plan be recommended to the President for consideration:
The alternative approach:
·
IRT
in consultation with College and Library Deans and the Academic IT Committee
identify and document the specific security and appropriate usage needs that
will be met through the remote monitoring and access capabilities provided by
IRT’s intended use of KBox as a System Management
Appliance.
·
Colleges
and the Library Deans be given the option of meeting
these needs locally or ceding that responsibility to IRT. Those that choose the local option will
assume the responsibility of providing IRT with the appropriate information
that ensures that the security and appropriate use of IT resources are being
maintained.
·
The
decision on which System Management Appliance to be purchased by those that
select the self-monitoring option be based on the specific security and
appropriate usage needs and that different alternatives be considered (Altiris Endpoint Management, Kaseya
IT Department Edition, KBox, LANDesk Management
Suite, Microsoft Systems Management Server, etc.).
· Kbox administration concerns
Carried.
FS 11-40A/Flr. |
WAIVER OF FIRST READING OF FS 11-40 |
The Faculty Senate waives the first reading of FS 11-40 “Learning Management System Workgroup, Endorsement of”.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11-40/Ex. |
LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WORKGROUP, ENDORSEMENT OF |
The Faculty Senate endorses the establishment of a Learning Management System workgroup, as described below:
Charge: The workgroup advises both the
Provost and the Chief Information Officer (CIO) on matters related to changes
in the campus Learning Management System (LMS) as Sacramento State transitions
its LMS (SacCT) from WebCT
to Blackboard Learn. The workgroup has no policy-making capacity. Policy issues
of a shared- governance nature that may arise from LMS Workgroup discussions
will be referred to the Faculty Senate.
The
responsibilities of the workgroup include:
·
Evaluating potential features of Blackboard Learn that should or should
not be adopted at Sacramento State.
·
Evaluating the potential campus impact of Blackboard Learn 9 upgrades
(hardware & software), new feature releases, service packs, and updates.
·
Facilitating consultation among and integration of various perspectives on
LMS transition: users, system administration, and support.
·
Providing clarification and advice on such LMS transition issues as
migration timeline and course migration (with shared governance issues going to
Faculty Senate).
·
Facilitating test groups of faculty members regarding development and
evaluation of training materials to support and facilitate teaching and
learning elements of LMS transition.
Duration: Workgroup will function from
present until the end of the fall 2012 semester, at which time the LMS
transition is expected to be complete.
Meetings: It is anticipated that the LMS
Workgroup will meet every other week initially. Much Workgroup activity will
occur via electronic means.
Membership: 11 members, co-chaired by representatives from the divisions of Academic Affairs and IRT
· JP Bayard (AA/ATCS) and Doug Jackson (IRT), co-chairs
·
Faculty Senate Representatives (3)
· Deans Representative (1)
· Jeff Dillon, IRT
· LMS system application administrator, IRT
· Raymond Piña, AA/ATCS
· Erin O’Meara, web application administrator, AA/ATCS
· Lucinda Parker, IRT
Carried unanimously.
FS 11-41A/Flr. |
WAIVER OF FIRST READING OF FS 11-41 |
The Faculty Senate waives the first reading of FS 11-41 “Committee Appointment Learning Management System Workgroup”.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11-41/Ex. |
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT - LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WORKGROUP |
Vera Margoniner
Frank Lilly
Maureen Lojo
Carried unanimously.
FS 11-29A/Flr. |
WAIVER
OF FIRST READING OF FS 11-29 |
The Faculty Senate waives the first reading of FS 11-29 “Uses of University Computer Labs for Academic Purposes”.
Carried unanimously.
FS 11-29/AITC/Ex. |
USES
OF UNIVERSITY COMPUTER LABS FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES |
The
Faculty Senate recommends the following for the period through the spring 2012 semester:
·
AIRC
1016 be designated as a computer lab available for one-time use to meet the
instructional need for administering exams for large on-line and
hybrid classes.
·
AIRC
1016 be available for student use at
times when the classroom is not scheduled to be “closed for testing”.
·
Notices
be appropriately displayed to inform student when AIRC
1016 will be “closed for testing”.
·
Data
be collected during the fall and spring semesters to assess the usability of ARC 1016 and
the need for dedicating additional facilities for one-time uses in meeting the
instructional needs for administering exams for large on-line and
hybrid classes.
·
IRT
provide regular maintenance to ensure
that sufficient numbers of workstations
in AIRC 1016 are available for use on days when the classroom is scheduled to
be “closed for testing”.
Carried unanimously.
Having reached the hour of adjournment, the following items will appear on the Faculty Senate agenda for April 21, 2011:
FS 11-42/Ex. |
BY-LAWS, AMENDMENT OF |
FS 11-43/FPC/Ex. |
OUTSTANDING FACULTY AWARDS, AMENDMENT OF |
FACULTY SENATE
SCHEDULE:
· April 21, 2011 – Senate meets
· May 5, 2011 – Senate meets
· May 12, 2011 - tentative