2011-2012 FACULTY SENATE
California State University, Sacramento

MINUTES
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Foothill Suite, Union

 

Present:

Altman, Nursing; Barrena, Biological Sciences; Bellon, Philosophy; Bersamin, Child Development; Blanton, Speech Pathology and Audiology; Bogazianos, Criminal Justice; Boulgarides, Temporary Faculty (Kinesiology and Health Science); Bowie, Social Work; Buckley, Computer Science; Buckman, Humanities; Carroll, Student Services; Chanda, Nursing; Choi, Business Administration; Cortez, Associated Students, Inc.; Deegan, Temporary Faculty (Family and Consumer Science); Dickson, Counselor Education; W. Dillon, Government; Domokos, Mathematics and Statistics; Echandia, Temporary Faculty (Bilingual/Multicultural Education); Fell, Civil Engineering; Flohr, Art; Gherman, Chemistry; Gibbs, Design; Gonzalez, Associated Students, Inc.; Goodrich, Theatre and Dance; Hadley, Sociology; Hamilton, Mathematics and Statistics; Hammersley, Geology; Hecsh, Teacher Education; Kirlin, Public Policy and Administration; Koegel, Communication Studies; Kornweibel, Emeritus Faculty (History); Krabacher, Parliamentarian and ASCSU Senator (Geography); Marbach, Mechanical Engineering; Mayberry, Foreign Languages; McKeough, Physical Therapy; Mejorado, Bilingual/Multicultural Education; Meltzer, CPC Chair (English); Michael, Management; Mikhailitchenko, Business Administration; Miller, GSPC Chair and ASCSU Senator (Communication Studies); Mosupyoe, Ethnic Studies; Moylan, Family and Consumer Sciences; Noel, FPC Chair (Teacher Education); Peigahi, GE/GRPC Chair (Library); Penrod, Psychology; Reddick, Library; Russell, Social Work; Shaw, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration; Sheppard, Faculty Senate Chair (Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration); Singer, Criminal Justice; V. Smith, Communication Studies; Stevens, Environmental Studies; Strasser, Anthropology; Theodorides, Kinesiology and Health Science; Van Gaasbeck, APC Chair (Economics);

Absent:

Blumberg, Music; Buchanan, English; J. Dixon, Temporary Faculty (Music); Matthews, Electrical and Electronic Engineering; Moni, Women’s Studies; Numark, History; Perez, Economics; Quirarte, Student Affairs; Reveles, Educational Leadership and Policy Studies; Taylor, Physics and Astronomy; Wanket, Geography; Vacant, Athletics; Vacant, Special Education, Rehabilitation, School Psychology & Deaf Studies

 

MOMENT OF SILENCE

 

Candace Mercedes Welch

Student

 

Stephanie Miller

Student

 

Timothy Barraud

Student

 

APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA

 

The agenda was approved as published.

 

CONSENT INFORMATION

 

FS11/12-57/CPC/Ex   PROGRAM PROPOSALS

                                   

                                    The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following change proposals:

A.    Undergraduate Spanish Major (deletion of minor requirement)                     Attachment A-1

B.     Undergraduate Spanish Major (minimum grade requirement) Attachment A-2

C.     Undergraduate Spanish Minor (minimum grade requirement) Attachment A-3

 

FS11/12-58/CPC/Ex   PROGRAM PROPOSALS

                                                           

The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following Program Proposals:

A.    HRS/HUM Minor Attachment B-1

B.     HRS/HUM Concentration Attachment B-2

C.     HRS/RS Minor Attachment B-4

D.    HRS/RS Concentration Attachment B-3

 

FS11/12-59/CPC/Ex   PROGRAM PROPOSAL

                                   

The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following Program Proposal:

A.    Moderate/Severe Education Specialist: Autism Spectrum Disorder Added Authorization Attachment G

 

FS 11/12-60/CPC/Ex PROGRAM PROPOSAL

                                    The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following Program Proposal:

A.    BS in Computer Science Major Attachment H

 

FS 11/12-61/CPC/Ex PROGRAM PROPOSAL

                       

            The Faculty Senate recommends approval of the following Program Proposal:

A.    Construction Management Undergraduate Degree Attachment I

 

FS 11/12-62/CPC/Ex

INTERIM POLICY ON PROGRAM IMPACTION

The Faculty Senate recommends immediate adoption of the following policy, to be in place until the end of AY2011-2012 and to be applied only to those programs requesting impacted status for the first time. Attachment J

 


 

CONSENT ACTION

 

FS 11/12-63/CPC/Ex PROGRAM REVIEW- COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

The Faculty Senate recommends that the two master’s programs (Computer Science and Software Engineering) and the Certificates of Advanced Study in the Computer Science Program at the Department of Computer Sciences be approved for six years or until the next scheduled program review.

 

Carried unanimously.

 

FS 11/12-64/CPC/Ex PROGRAM REVIEW- ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING

The Faculty Senate recommends that the two master’s programs (Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Engineering) at the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering be approved for six years or until the next scheduled program review.

 

Carried unanimously.

 

FS 11/12-65/CPC/Ex PROGRAM REVIEW- MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

The Faculty Senate recommends that the master’s program in Mechanical Engineering be approved for six years or until the next scheduled program review with an interim report due to Academic Affairs in March 2014 that satisfies both University and WASC requirements and provides appropriate data for the three questions in their focused inquiry.

 

Carried unanimously.

 

FS 11/12-66/CPC/Ex PROGRAM REVIEW- CIVIL ENGINEERING

The Faculty Senate recommends that the master’s program in Civil Engineering be approved for six years or until the next scheduled program review with an interim report due to Academic Affairs in March 2014 that 1) satisfies both University and WASC requirements, 2) provides appropriate data for the three questions in their focused inquiry, and 3) includes a workable and fully implemented graduate assessment plan.

 

Carried unanimously.

 

See Attachment K for FS 11/12-63/CPC/Ex through FS 11-12-66/CPC/Ex

 

FS 11/12-67/CPC/Ex PROGRAM PROPOSAL MA PROGRAM – TESOL

The Faculty Senate recommends the approval of the MA Program in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Attachment L

 

Carried unanimously.

 


 

FS 11/12-68/Ex.          SELECT COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT

 

                                    Select Advisory Committee for the Vice President of Administration and

                                    Chief Financial Officer

                                    Eric Lin, Finance, CBA

                                    Matthew Hoag, Accounting and Information Systems, CBA

 

Carried unanimously.

 

FS 11/12-69/CPC/Ex PROGRAM REVIEW – DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN’S STUDIES

 

The Faculty Senate recommends that the Women’s Studies program be approved for six years or until the next program review.

 

Carried unanimously.

 

FS 11/12-70/CPC/Ex PROGRAM REVIEW – GERONTOLOGY PROGRAM

 

The Faculty Senate recommends that the Gerontology program be approved for six years or until the next program review.

 

Carried unanimously.

 

FS 11/12-71/CPC/Ex PROGRAM REVIEW – ASIAN STUDIES PROGAM

 

The Faculty Senate recommends that the Asian Studies program be approved for six years or until the next program review.

 

Carried unanimously.

 

            See Attachment M for FS 11/12-60/CPC/Ex through FS 11/12-71/CPC/Ex.

 

FS 11/12-72/Flr           MINUTES OF DECEMBER 1, 2011

Carried unanimously.

 

FS 11/12-74/Ex.          COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT – UNIVERSITY

                                   

                                    Campus Safety and Environmental Health Committee

                                    Jennie Singer, 2014

 

Carried unanimously.

 


 

The following items will receive a Second Reading at the Faculty Senate meeting on February 16, 2012 (or at a subsequent meeting).

 

FS 11/12-

73/SCIPP/Ex               POLICY ON INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM PRIORITIES: ACADEMIC PLANNING, RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT, AMENDMENT OF

 

The Faculty Senate recommends the following change to the quartile grouping as outlined in Section V of the Policy on Instructional Program Priorities: Academic Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management:

 

The process of making recommendations for academic prioritization shall result in four separate groupings-undergraduate degree programs (majors), other undergraduate programs (e.g., minors/certificates), graduate degree programs, and other graduate programs (e.g., credentials/certificates)-into quartiles based upon the criteria described in Section III for undergraduate programs) and Section IV (for graduate programs).

Background

Section V of the Policy on Instructional Program Priorities: Academic Planning, Resource Allocation and Enrollment Management states that “the process of making recommendations for academic prioritization shall result in undergraduate and graduate/credential programs (separately) being grouped into quartiles based upon the criteria described in Sections III and IV.” This ranking process places programs into two groupings. Based on the most current list of approved programs received from Academic Affairs, there are 238 programs in the undergraduate grouping and 122 programs in the graduate grouping.

Whereas, each quartile grouping would result in four (4) clusters of equal frequencies, the undergraduate grouping (with 238 programs) would have approx. 60 programs within each quartile cluster and the graduate grouping (with 122 programs) would have approx. 30 programs within each quartile cluster.

Based on the most current list of approved programs received from Academic Affairs, the breakdown of undergraduate programs are:

·         140 programs are majors

·         83 programs are minors

·         15 programs are certificate

Based on the most current list of approved programs received from Academic Affairs, the breakdowns of graduate programs are:

·         94 programs are majors

·         28 programs fall in the certificate/credential category

Justification

The task of comparing and ranking dissimilar programs is a formidable one. To make the task meaningful, the Senate Committee on the Policy on Instructional Program Priorities (SCIPP) is recommending that two (2) additional groupings be added to the ranking process. The addition of two groupings for non-major programs at both the undergraduate and graduate level would reduce the problems associated with ranking programs that are inherently non-comparable on multiple criteria.  For example, many minors and certificates have extremely low or negligible costs as they rely on coursework already embedded in majors.  Conversely, only major programs strictly "graduate" students.  On balance, the Committee thinks that more of the criteria (those not associated with cost) disadvantage non-major programs than advantage them. 

 

While being careful not to anticipate results, the Committee would like to guard against the possibility that the bottom two quartiles could potentially be weighted with non-major programs. It doesn't seem to be within the spirit of the policy that the lower quartiles be populated with non-major programs simply because the criteria seem more focused on measurements associated with majors.  While the majors would likely see their rankings artificially elevated, it undermines the purpose of a quartile approach to meaningful program comparisons.

FS 11/12-

50/GSPC/Ex               SECOND BACHELOR’S DEGREE CATEGORIES, REVISIONS TO

 

                                    The Faculty Senate recommends revising the “Second Bachelor’s Degree

                                    Categories” as outlined in Attachment C.

 

FS 11/12-52/APC/Ex  MINIMUM GRADES FOR UNDERGRADUATE PREREQUISITE

                                    COURSEWORK, AMENDMENT TO

                        The Faculty Senate recommends amending the “Minimum Grades for

                        Undergraduate Prerequisite Coursework” as proposed in Attachment D-1.

 

                        Note: The side-by-side comparison can be found in Attachment D-2.

 

                        BACKGROUND:

Academic Affairs referred the issue of minimum grades required for prerequisite coursework. Currently, there is no university policy on satisfactory completion of prerequisites. However, there is a policy that provides that a grade of “C-” be considered a “C” for the purposes of satisfying prerequisite coursework. Last year, there was an inquiry from Geography regarding our policy regarding a minimum grade requirement for prerequisite coursework.  This past summer, we had a similar inquiry from Physics. In CMS, the default setting for a prerequisite is “C-”; however, our actual policy is ambiguous as to whether or not a grade below a “C-” (i.e. “D”) is sufficient to fulfill a prerequisite requirement.

 

The Academic Policies Committee voted unanimously on October 7, 2011 to refer the item to the Executive Committee.  At the same meeting, a motion to endorse the item failed: 4 Yes, 4 No, 3 Abstentions On October 14, 2011, the Academic Policies Committee voted unanimously to recommend the attached policy language.

 

The following issues were raised by APC on Minimum Grade of C- or better in prerequisite coursework

·         The absence of a University policy allows individual departments to enforce minimum grade requirements without Faculty Senate approval/review.  Some departments may assume the enforcement of a specific grade.

·         If there is uncertainty in how grades in prerequisite coursework are enforced, this may create difficulties in student course plans and advising.  Having a university baseline, or default, would alleviate this uncertainty because it would require that departments explicitly state their prerequisite grade requirements, if they differ from a university standard.

·         There is no evidence that the lack of a university minimum grade requirement is problematic.  The question of how many students would be affected, and therefore the need for such a policy, was raised by the committee.

·         Establishing a minimum standard for prerequisites at the university level makes sense based on the definition of grades in academic policy (e.g., passing with a C grade versus passing with a D grade).

·         There is ambiguity in the current catalog language, which suggests that some change to the policy is needed to eliminate this ambiguity.  The current catalog language is based on the assumption that before the introduction of “+/-” grades, a “C” was required in order to satisfy a course prerequisite.

 

FS 11/12-

53/GSPC/Ex               ACADEMIC RENEWAL, REVISIONS TO INCLUDE GRADUATE STUDENTS

 

                                    The Faculty Senate recommends revising the “Academic Renewal Policy” to

                                    include graduate students. The proposed policy can be found in Attachment E.

 

FS 11/12-

54/CPC/Ex                  BA AND BS POLICY CHANGE (UPPER DIVISION UNITS IN MAJORS)

 

                                    The Faculty Senate recommends amending the BA and BS Policy as follows:

 

Bachelor of Arts Degree majors require a minimum of 24 semester units in the major with at least 12 units at upper division. Bachelor of Arts Degree majors are limited to 48 units in the major field, including lower division prerequisites. The comprehensive liberal studies degree program which includes both major and general education requirements is currently exempt from the 48 unit limitation. Exemptions to the unit limitation are granted only upon the recommendation of the Academic Senate's Curriculum Committee and approval of the school dean and the Vice President, Academic Affairs.

 

The Bachelor of Science Degree has the same primary objectives as the Bachelor of Arts Degree but is grounded in scientific methodology and emphasizes applications in a wide range of technical and professional fields. Bachelor of Science majors require a minimum of 36 semester units in the major with at least 18 semester units at upper division, and are limited to no more than one


 

half the total degree unit requirements in the major field, inclusive of both lower and upper division units, but exclusive of co-requisite requirements. Exemptions to the unit limitation of Bachelor of Science programs are made in the same fashion indicated for Bachelor of Arts programs.

                        The complete background information and side-by-side comparison can be found

                        in Attachment F.

 

SENATE SPRING SCHEDULE:

 

The Faculty Senate meets routinely the 1st, 3rd, and 5th Thursday of each month, from 3:00-5:00 pm, in the Foothill Suite, University Union, unless notified otherwise

 

The Faculty Senate meets on the 2nd and 4th Thursday of each month, on an as needed basis.

 

It is currently anticipated that the organizational meetings for the 2012-2013 Senate will occur on March 15th and 29th.  These are the meetings during which nominations and elections are held for next year’s Senate. On those dates, the 2012-2013 Senate will meet from 3:00 pm – 3:20 pm (approx.) and the 2011-2012 Senate will meet and continue with regular business immediately following adjournment of the 2012-2013 organizational meeting.