|
Housing
survey shows interest in University Village
The
campus community gives a “thumbs up” to the idea
of University housing close to campus.
More
than 550 faculty, staff and administrators responded to a
recent University Enterprises survey to assess interest for
the proposed University Village project south of campus. And
of those nearly 70 percent said they would be interested,
including almost 120 respondents who asked to “Hold
my spot.”
Of
those faculty who said yes, 60 percent said they have considered
leaving the University over housing issues and their primary
dissatisfaction with their current housing situation was that
they did not own their own homes and were too far away from
the campus.
The
survey was further analyzed to determine what those who are
interested in the Village would be looking for. It showed
respondents wanted to buy rather than rent and that the ideal
new home would be a 1,200 to 1,599-square-foot, three bedroom,
two-bath, single-family home.
Staff
seemed particularly interested in the project, making up more
than 57 percent of those who expressed an interest. Interested
employees were also:
- Full-time
employees (87 percent) who had been on campus from four
to six years (27 percent), one to three years (25.8 percent)
and more than 10 years (23.7 percent).
-
From two-adult households (55 percent) and most had no children
(67 percent).
-
Nearly equally split among those currently rent (51.5 percent)
and those who own (48.5 percent) and most were satisfied
with their current housing situation (46 percent).
According
to the survey by far the most attractive asset of the planned
complex would be its closeness to campus, cited by 75 percent
of those expressing an interest. But nearly 30 percent of
those expressed interest said they already live within one
to four miles of the campus, while 16 percent live more than
20 miles away. Only 18 percent said that distance from the
campus is the reason for their dissatisfaction with their
current situation.
Among
interested parties, their preferences in housing are overwhelmingly
to own (92 percent) a single family home (69 percent.) The
second housing choice was a duplex or triplex. Condominium/Townhouse
was second in both first and second choices. Most prefer a
three-bedroom (53 percent) two-bath (61 percent) with between
1,200 to 1,599 square-feet (38 percent) at a mortgage of less
than $1,500 per month (60 percent).
Other
questions asked about employees’ current housing, how
they get to campus, amenities home owners might seek such
as garages and security, and community assets such as parks,
a school, and a fitness center. Affordability (91 percent)
and proximity to campus (75 percent) were the most highly
valued benefits with access to light rail (75 percent) and
university affiliation (69 percent) also standing out as significant
values for future residents.
University
Village is planned for land between Folsom Blvd. and Power
Inn Road that formerly housed a California Youth Authority
facility. The initial plan calls for a combination of rental
apartments, and for-sale condominium or townhouses, and single
family homes specifically for Sacramento State faculty and
staff.
University
Enterprises Development Group will use the survey results
to shape plans for the proposed Village. After a series of
additional opportunities for campus community input, the project
could be ready for occupancy as early as the 2008-09 academic
year.
Complete
survey results are available on the University Enterprises
website at www.enterprises.csus.edu/project/ramona.
|