Building A Powerful Reading Program: From Research to Practice

Over the last two years California has seen a decline in the reading test scores of its students and increased concern among educators and parents, along with renewed interest and accelerated research into the teaching of reading. In the Fall of 1995, the State Superintendent of Public Instruction issued a report from the Reading Task Force that called for balance in the way reading is taught. Since that report, many schools and districts have been attempting to design and implement comprehensive programs. This document lays out the current research base along with proven practices for effective literacy instruction, particularly in the early grades. In addition, recommendations are included for preservice and inservice education that will guarantee a well-prepared teaching force to tackle the complexities of literacy and teach all of our children to read well.

This report was prepared by Linda Diamond and Sheila Mandel of theConsortium on Reading Excellence, a division of the Institute for Policy Analysis and Research, 2200 Powell Street, Suite 250A, Emeryville, CA 94608, (510) 450-2555.

In the Fall of 1995, California issued a report from the Reading Task Force appointed by State Superintendent of Public Instruction Delaine Eastin. The Task Force Report called for a return to balance in the way reading is taught. The Task Force also emphasized the importance of a comprehensive approach to reading that includes both direct skill instruction and the activities and strategies most often associated with effective whole language classrooms.

Teaching reading has never been easy. While oral language seems to develop naturally for most children, reading does not. In addition to the "unnaturalness" of reading for many children, reading instruction has often been at the center of philosophical and political debate. Teachers, administrators, and parents have watched the pendulum swing one way and then another for so long that they are weary. However, enough is now known about reading that the destructive and often rancorous debates about how best to teach it can and should be put to rest.

The research presented in this document draws on the entire field but especially highlights three respected practitioner/researchers: Hallie Yopp, Professor, Department of Elementary and Bilingual Education, California State University Fullerton; Marilyn Adams, Ph. D., Senior Scientist, Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc.; and David Pearson, Professor at Michigan State University. All experts emphasize the importance of a systematic and research-based instructional approach aimed at giving students control as they learn to read. This systematic approach has two critical elements:

Such an approach is not a return to dull, repetitive drills in classrooms devoid of engaging literature; rather it is part of a broader language-rich program consistent with the best practices of whole language and the California Language Arts Framework. The implications, then, for teacher preparation arise out of understanding what is required to teach reading: teacher education should include an "understanding of how the English language system works, how students learn to read, and state-of-the-art best practices in both skill development and whole language activities" (Professor Gerald Treadway, California State University at San Diego).

This report builds on the Task Force Report by describing the clear research base for changing the way reading is taught and by providing practical ways for schools to implement such comprehensive reading programs. It covers three main topics:

Because of the convergence of research and best practice, it is now abundantly clear what it will take to enable children to become skilled readers. All successful early reading programs must:

In addition, direct instruction and practice comprehending the meaning of text must start early and build through the grades. Instruction in the upper grades must extend and build upon the skills developed earlier. All of these skills must be taught as part of a comprehensive approach that includes varied and abundant printed materials, active learning, and the development of written and spoken language through highly engaging activities.

Research Highlights

Hallie Kay Yopp, Ph.D, Professor, Dept. of Elementary and Bilingual Education,CSU Fullerton

Professor Yopp addresses the critical role of phonemic awareness in the early stages of reading acquisition. She defines phonemic awareness as "the awareness that phonemes exist as abstractable and manipulable components of spoken language. It is the ability to reflect on speech and experiment (play) with its smallest components (phonemes). Phonemic awareness is not phonics and not auditory discrimination."

The research outlines a progression of phonemic awareness development in pre-school, kindergarten, and early first grade that includes the ability:

Key Research Findings About Phonemic Awareness:

Phonemic awareness can be developed in children by providing them with rich language experiences that encourage active exploration and manipulation of sounds. These activities lead to significant gains in subsequent reading and spelling performance. Most children will learn basic phonemic awareness from these activities. Some children need more extensive assistance. Children should be diagnosed mid-kindergarten to see if they are adequately progressing, and if not, given more intensive phonemic awareness experiences. For all children, the more complex phonemic awareness abilities are learned in the context of learning letter/sound correspondences.

A close relationship exists between a child's control over sounds and his reading ability. Some quick test instruments that reliably assess development of phonemic awareness in about five minutes include the Rosner, the Yopp-Singer tests, and the Roswell-Chall.

In numerous studies, correlations between a kindergarten test of phonemic awareness and performance in reading years later are extremely high. Thus, phonemic awareness has been identified by researchers in replicated studies in many countries as a very potent predictor of success in reading and spelling achievement. In fact, Professor Yopp indicates that such high correlations remain even after controlling for intelligence and socio-economic status.

Marilyn Adams, Ph.d., Senior Scientist, Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc.

Dr. Adams focuses on the need for children to develop automatic word recognition and the system to achieve this. Dr. Adams supports Dr. Yopp's conclusion that training in phonemic awareness is the foundation for learning to recognize words. Such training is necessary because most children enter kindergarten without the conscious awareness that words are made up of distinct sounds; rather they hear words as complete units. Dr. Adams discusses the value of whole language in encouraging flexible class organization, the use of quality literature, and the emphasis on early writing. However, she faults the methodology of whole language for operating under the mistaken assumption that skillful readers "skip, skim, and guess" instead of reading what's on the page.

Extensive eye movement research replicated by brain scans shows that skillful readers move their eyes from left to right, are "meticulously respectful of the words, and irrepressibly translate print to speech as they read line by line." The goal of reading instruction is to make the process of reading words effortless and automatic so that the mind can be free to reflect on meaning. In order to do this children must have "detailed knowledge of words, of how they are spelled, and of how they map onto speech." Both whole language and some conventional phonics programs are faulted for not teaching that speech can be broken down into sound (phonemic awareness) and for not providing detailed knowledge of the language system.

Research shows that IQ, mental age, perceptual styles, handedness, race, or parents' education are all weak predictors of reading success.

The factors that contribute directly to reading ability are:

After phonemic awareness, the best predictor of first grade reading is a child's ability to recognize letters.

Dr. Adams emphasizes the importance of organized phonics instruction because it allows children to use the system of language rather than to guess. Research indicates that a direct and organized way of acquainting children with the major components of our alphabetic system is more effective than an indirect approach which lacks precision, order, and clarity. While some children will intuitively figure out the system, many will learn faster and better by receiving organized and explicit instruction. In addition to direct instruction, Dr. Adams states that students must be able to practice what they have been taught in decodable text mostly comprised of words that contain the sounds/symbols being taught. Dr. Adams' study of the research has shown clearly that students who do not develop basic phonemic awareness, letter recognition, and the ability to decode words quickly will have difficulty learning to read. Many of these children end up identified as dyslexic and require special education.

A major series of research studies directed by G. Reid Lyon of the National Institute of Child, Health, and Human Development (NICHD) in Bethesda, Maryland and others confirms this. These studies looked at the features that predispose children to having reading disabilities. The major problem appears to be phonological processing.

Three areas of phonological processing difficulty predispose children to reading disabilities:

For these students, without systematic and explicit instruction in the code system, reading becomes a probabilistic guessing game. The NICHD studies identify the best strategies to use with these children.

The following three strategies need to be in place for all successful interventions:

Furthermore, the NICHD research indicates that interventions must begin early. Research shows that if schools delay intervention until age seven for children experiencing difficulty, 75 percent will continue having difficulties. Professor Foorman of the University of Houston finds that dyslexic problems, if caught in first or second grade, may be remedied 82 percent of the time. Those caught in third to fifth grades may be improved 46 percent of the time, while those identified later may only be treated successfully 10-15 percent of the time. Robert Slavin's effective reading program, Success For All, which focuses on early intervention, has actually reduced special education populations more than 25 percent in schools using his approach.

In addition to organized phonics, Dr. Adams talks about the value of invented spelling because it serves as an excellent diagnostic tool and it engages children in the sounds of words. Professor Adams and others encourage this practice as a way for children to begin to express their ideas unconstrained by their limited orthographic knowledge. Adams (1990) points out that students who have ample experience with invented spelling improve in both reading fluency and spelling. She goes on, however, to indicate that direct instruction in word analysis and consonant blending is a necessary adjunct to children's spelling development. Furthermore, Professor Adams and others (Woloshyn and Pressley) urge an organized, spelling program starting around the middle to late first grade as a productive and often neglected strategy to help children learn to read.

Unlike the old phonics programs of the past which relied heavily on drill and rote memorization, Professor Adams and others, notably Stanford University Education Professor Robert Calfee, cite the importance of making decoding and spelling instruction active. Calfee encourages "word work", 10-20 minutes of daily word play during which small groups of students construct words. Such interactive lessons treat students as "budding cryptographers" and problem solvers and integrate decoding with spelling (Calfee and Moran, 1993).

Finally, Professor Adams indicates that in addition to the skills for decoding, children need to explore the language of books, hear texts read aloud, and read a large number of books.

David Pearson, Ph. D., Professor, Michigan State University

David Pearson focuses on the need to systematically develop students' comprehension skills. His comments are directed at helping students with text meaning, which requires teaching students to be good thinkers when they read by instructing them in metacognitional strategies, providing opportunities for in-depth discussions, encouraging extensive authentic reading and writing activities, and immersing them in literature. Professor Pearson finds that in many classrooms, students spend little time actually reading texts. Much of their instructional time is spent on workbook-type assignments. The skill/time ratio is typically the highest for children of the lowest reading ability (Allington, 1983). Furthermore, the research indicates that teachers are spending inadequate amounts of time on direct comprehension instruction. A study completed in 1979 (Durkin) concluded that teachers used either workbooks or textbook questions to determine a student's understanding of content, but rarely taught students "how to comprehend." In 1987, Dr. Pearson (and Dole) described the importance of "explicit instruction" for teaching comprehension.

Such instruction involves four phases:

Dr. Pearson emphasizes that comprehension instruction must be embedded in texts rather than taught in isolation through workbook pages.

Dr. Pearson describes what good comprehension instruction should include:

Recommendations for Schools and Classrooms

Given the extensive research into effective reading practices, schools will need all of the components described below to have comprehensive, balanced programs.

Early Literacy Program

Beginning in pre-school and continuing through the primary grades, schools must include language activities that develop listening and expressive skills. Such activities include:

These activities develop understanding of vocabulary, syntax, and story structure in all children. They are especially important for English language learners and for children who do not come from homes where literacy is nurtured.

Schools must build activities which teach children concepts about print and foster a love of reading. Children should be read to daily, using books with predictable patterns, repetition, and rhyme. The classroom needs to be full of print that is varied and meaningful to the children. This includes:

These activities support developing readers.

Starting in pre-school and continuing in kindergarten, phonemic awareness should be developed in linguistically-rich environments where children are encouraged to play with the sounds of language through developmentally appropriate activities. Phonemic awareness may include:

a general awareness ( that some words are longer than others, for example)

Activities that capitalize on children's natural curiosity and sense of playfulness would include (Yopp):

All of the activities above start through oral development. Children "hear" the words and see pictures of the objects (e.g. a milk bottle, a top, a man, a cup). These activities should be dynamic, not done through drills and rote memorization.

Schools should assess students' phonemic awareness development and should intensify experiences for students who are not progressing.

Research has shown that about twenty minutes a day, three to four times a week, will result in dramatic improvement for students who need further development in phonemic awareness. Both formal and informal assessments should be conducted that will allow teachers to assess which phonemic insights need continued development in order to help students progress in decoding. Again, the school needs to have in place intensified intervention in phonemic awareness for any student in the primary grades who has not developed this ability.

Starting in pre-school and kindergarten, schools should help students learn the names and shapes of letters. Schools should make use of various fun strategies to familiarize children with the names of the letters thus giving them a "peg to which their visual perceptions can be attached" (Adams). Instruction in recognizing the shape that matches the letter name takes "time and practice and takes careful visual attention" (Adams). Research suggests important points to consider when teaching the alphabet:

By learning letter names through playful and engaging repetition, students may be protected from confusing the sound of a letter with its name.

In late kindergarten and early first grade, schools must provide organized and systematic phonics instruction that is based on diagnostic information. Many children enter school with lots of prior print experience. For these children, the content of the phonics lessons will consist more of review and clarification than of new information, and sound/symbol lessons may proceed quite rapidly.

Other children, however, enter school with little prior print knowledge and will require more instruction. For these children, sufficient and repeated practice spread over time will be essential, along with frequent opportunities for evaluation. Instruction should be based on the following critical points:

Students must learn that the symbols of the alphabet are worth learning and discriminating because each stands for at least one of the sounds that occur in spoken words (the alphabetic principle).

Phonics instruction must be explicit and should include instruction in blending letter sounds.
Explicit phonics provides children with the real relationships between letters and sounds, or at least the approximations of them (Juel).

Teachers need to provide instruction in word attack skills, including sounding out, syllabication, recognizing common letter patterns and generating alternative pronunciations that will enable children to start to read beginning materials independently.

Students need ample opportunities to practice in books they can read independently, and teachers need to reinforce phonics instruction as they share literature with students.

Without the right skills, children will over-rely on context rather than visually store words and letter patterns that will lead to automatic word recognition. Adams points out that a solid base of letter/sound correspondence knowledge supported by, rather than relying on, context will enable students to sound out and then identify any written word that is in their listening vocabulary (Adams).

The best instruction provides a strong relationship between what the children learn in phonics and the stories they read. There should be a "high proportion of the words in the earliest selections children read that conform to the phonics that they have already been taught" (Becoming a Nation of Readers). These selections also need enough high-frequency words so that the texts sound natural.

Reading predictable texts to children may help them develop syntactic awareness, semantic knowledge and vocabulary; however, predictable (when they are not decodable using grapho-phonic cues) texts do not support children's growing understanding of the alphabetic principles of English.

The best practice combines immersing children in rich language by reading to them and providing access to a variety of texts, while explicitly and systematically teaching them the sounds and their symbols and connecting these to decodable texts.

Phonics instruction need not be tedious. Instead, activities which promote play with words in hands-on ways will contribute to children's growing understanding of the sound/symbol system. When children are able to decode automatically, they can concentrate on the meaning of text.

Although a formal spelling program need not begin until late first grade, schools should encourage and accept invented spelling as soon as children begin to write spontaneously. Invented spelling is a diagnostic tool that provides a window on children's developing knowledge of speech sounds and orthography and frees children to experiment with print. Research has shown that writing can precede and support reading. Students should be given regular opportunities to express themselves on paper. Below are some examples of early writing activities:

Direct spelling instruction is also necessary. Recent research has shown that children progress faster in both spelling and reading if they are taught how to analyze speech sounds in words and taught how to spell them by using sound/symbol correspondence. Moreover, Adams points out that "the process of copying new words strengthens students' memory for those words and does so rather enduringly" (Whittlesea, 1987).

A daily writing program beginning in kindergarten (for those who already have the necessary fine motor control) and in first grade is essential to help children learn phonics.

Encoding the sound/symbol correspondences in both directed and free writing sessions provides practice for the children and information for the teacher about how much each child knows about these correspondences.

Opportunities to write stories, letters, and reports, as well as instruction in mechanics, grammar and usage, should all be part of the writing program. Further, student-authored books contribute positively to a classroom library.

Schools should consider a number of different grouping strategies to reduce the span of skills so that instruction can be efficient and effective, and to avoid a lock-step curriculum that is too easy for some and too difficult for others. Some flexible grouping practices include:

Because of the critical nature of reading, sufficient time must be set aside for instruction. In kindergarten, it is recommended that at least one third of the day be devoted to language arts activities. In the early primary grades, at least two to three hours should be spent on language arts activities, including reading, writing, oral language and spelling. Language arts activities in general and reading in particular can and should also be linked to other areas of the curriculum.

Upper Elementary

Instruction in writing continues through the grades.

Children should have opportunities to practice the process of writing as well as to fine-tune and edit writing. Writing instruction needs to develop fluency as well as correctness.

Children should learn complex sentence structure, paragraphing, organization, and more advanced grammar and usage both directly and indirectly through daily writing that encourages them to write across the curriculum.

Children should be writing for a variety of purposes and to a variety of audiences.

It is important to encourage oral reports, debates, and group discussions so that children continue to develop their oral skills. Learning to take turns and respond to questions should be part of this oral skill development.

Spelling lessons that are based on diagnostic information continue to be important.
For those children who continue to struggle with the sound-symbol system, spelling lists organized by sound themes remain critical.

In addition, irregular words, homonyms and high-utility morphemes should be taught.
Research suggests that immediate self-correction of tests is critical to progress in spelling.

Decoding skills should continue through the elementary school years as needed. Students should be taught more advanced skills, including how to make use of complex letter/sound correspondences, word roots, prefixes and suffixes, and syllabication.

Vocabulary development continues through extensive reading opportunities, during oral discussions and explanations, and through strategies such as synonym building and semantic trees.

Advanced strategic reading skills such as summarizing, predicting, questioning, and visualizing should be modeled and directly taught in the context of reading varied materials. This presupposes regular time for reading and discussion in groups as well as independently.

Activities to foster "deep discussions" about books should be built into the school day. Such discussions should focus on important questions and extend and deepen children's understanding of texts.

All Grades

Parents should be enlisted to support the development of their child's reading skills by:

This home-school connection should be supported by schools and teachers through regular communications with parents about classroom activities and expectations. Materials should be sent home for parents to read with their children.

Because ongoing assessment is a critical part of successful reading programs, children who need more intense instruction should be identified beginning in mid-kindergarten. For these children, tutors should be made available on a daily basis. Children who transfer in to a school should be immediately assessed and provided tutoring assistance if the need is warranted.

Students should be given ample opportunity to read in order to put their skills to use. Children should be reading twenty-five to thirty-five grade-appropriate books each year from accepted fiction and non-fiction lists. Teachers should:

Flexible grouping should be used throughout the grades to ensure children are acquiring the skills they need.

Implications for Professional Development:
Preservice and Inservice

Teaching reading is a complex activity. Teachers must be equipped with the necessary practical skills and underlying linguistic understandings in order to have a repertoire of techniques that will enable all children to learn to read. So much has been learned about reading and literacy recently that both preservice educators and those already teaching will need up-to-date information on best practices. The key to improving literacy instruction in California is professional development and teacher preparation.

Marilyn Adams and Hallie Yopp both cite the need for teachers to have diagnostic-based professional training that includes a serious examination of language, literacy, and cognitive development. Professor Treadway reiterates this position, adding that good materials must also be available to support instruction, and that teachers need enough theory to be able to use the materials well. Preparation should include:

Beginning Teachers

Given the body of information to be learned and the practical experience to gain, many are now calling for five-year programs in teacher education, with reading and literacy preparation beginning prior to the fifth year. Beginning teachers need practical experience student teaching and observing in classrooms taught by veterans identified as effective teachers of literacy. These apprenticeships should be joined to a seminar that provides the research base and diagnostic information to reinforce what teachers are seeing and doing with children and which can serve as a vehicle for collegial learning and problem solving.

The linguistic system itself is a complex topic that will require in-depth preparation. Louisa Cook Moats, director of Teacher Training at the Greenwood Institute in Putney, Vermont and Adjunct Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychiatry at Dartmouth Medical School, talks about the importance of teachers understanding the phonological structure of words since so much research now points to the importance of phonemic awareness as a predictor of a child's reading success. In addition, she calls for instruction to beginning teachers in the morphemic structure of words since poor readers and spellers have limited structural awareness. Furthermore, she cites the lack of understanding many teachers have of the basic alphabetic system and the importance of "code-based instruction" for beginning and problem readers.

Informed teachers will be able to present linguistic concepts accurately and be better able to assess a student's stage of reading and spelling development. Such knowledge provides a solid foundation on which to base instructional practice.

Others in the field of teacher education stress the importance of clinical instruction for teachers in training. Professor John Shefelbine at California State University, Sacramento, has trained master teachers and then places his student teachers with those masters to work directly with students. By regularly reflecting upon and discussing the students' development, pre-service teachers are able to gain practical insights into the way children learn to read.

Because so much reading instruction will require teachers to diagnose students and group them for specific instruction, teacher education must arm teachers-in-training with a repertoire of effective diagnostic tools and with an understanding of how to manage a classroom in which students will be working at different levels in small groups.

Effective Beginning Teacher Programs:

Inservice Education

Many veteran teachers may not have been able to keep current with the growing body of research into reading. In addition, many new teachers have entered the profession without the background described above. Thus, inservice education needs to address the same topics and information as that of preservice education. Inservice professional development should include:

The training should be presented through workshops which include demonstrations, practice with children, and opportunities for discussion and problem solving.

Effective Inservice Education:

Such workshop training should be supported at the school sites by regular staff discussions about the research as well as about implementation issues. Furthermore, school staff should extend their knowledge by conducting case studies on individual students and/or controlled group studies to assess their own and the school's progress over time. Teachers will need school-based support through coaching and feedback as well as time to observe in classrooms where teachers are highly effective in teaching children to read.


Citations in this document are taken from Professor Adams' book identified in the resource list below and directly from presentations made during a February 29, 1996 seminar sponsored jointly by the California Education Policy Seminar and The California State University Institute for Education Reform. References in the section on Professor David Pearson are from his work cited below. The source documents for other citations are noted below in the Resources and Organizations list.

Resources and Organizations

Adams, M. Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning About Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.

Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., and Johnston, F. Words Their Way: Word Study for Phonics, Vocabulary, and Spelling. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1996.

Calfee, R.C. and Moran, C. "Comprehending Orthography; Social Construction of Letter-Sound in Monolingual and Bilingual Programs". Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 5, 205-225, 1993.

Calfee, R.C. "A Behind-the-Scenes Look at Reading Acquisition". Issues in Education, Vol.1, 77-82, 1995.

California Reading Task Force. Every Child A Reader. Sacramento, California: Department of Education, 1995.

Clay, M. M. Becoming Literate: The Construction of Inner Control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1991.

Consortium on Reading Excellence, 2200 Powell St. Suite 250-A, Emeryville, CA 94608, (510) 450-2555.

Cunningham, P. Phonics They Use: Words for Reading and Writing. New York: Harper Collins, 1991.

Delphit, L.D. Other People's Children. New York: New Press, 1995.

Foorman, B.R. "The Case for Early Reading Intervention". Foundations of Reading Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, in press.

Graves, D. A Fresh Look at Writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1994.

Honig, B. Teaching Our Children to Read. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, Inc., 1996.

Houghton Mifflin. Early Success: An Intervention Program, Grades 1 - 2. Boston, MA: 1995.

Johnston, F., Juel, C., and Invernizzi, M. Guidelines for Volunteer Tutors of Emergent and Early Readers. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Bookstore, 1995.

Juel, C. Learning to Read and Write in One Elementary School. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.

Lindamood, C., and Lindamood, P. Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test, 2nd ed. Chicago: Riverside Publishing, 1979.

Lindamood, C., and Lindamood, P. The A.D.D. Program: Auditory Discrimination in Depth, 2nd ed. Columbus, OH: SRA Division, Macmillan/McGraw-Hill, 1975.

Lyon, G. R. Research in Learning Disabilities at the NICHD. Bethesda, MD:NICHD Technical Document/ Human Learning and Behavior Branch, 1994.

Moats, L. C. Spelling: Development, Disabilities, and Instruction.. Timonium, MD: York Press, Inc., 1995.

Modern Curriculum Press. Discovery Phonics: An Integrated Approach to Decoding Strategies. Columbus, OH.

Modern Curriculum Press. Poetry Works! The First Verse Complete Set. Columbus, OH.

Open Court Publishing Company. Phonemic Awareness and Phonics Kit. Peru, IL

Pearson, D. "Focus on Research: Teaching and Learning Reading: A Research Perspective". Language Arts, 70, 502-511, 1993.

Shefelbine, J. Learning and Using Phonics in Beginning Reading. New York: Scholastic, Inc., 1995.

Stahl, S.A. "Saying the 'P' Word: Nine Guidelines for Exemplary Phonics Instruction". The Reading Teacher, vol. 43, 618-625, 1992.

Stanovich, K.E. "Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy". Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 21, 360-407, 1986.

Success For All, Center for Research on Effective Schooling for Disadvantaged Students, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

The California Literature Projects, California Department of Education, Sacramento, CA.

The Learning Company, Meizner, Inc. Read, Write, and Type. Pelham, NY: 1995.

The Orton Dyslexia Society, Chester Building/Suite 382, 8600 LaSalle Road, Baltimore, MD 21286-2044

Torgeson, J. and Bryant, B. Phonological Awareness Training for Reading. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Publishing, 1994.

Torgeson, J. and Bryant, B. Test of Phonological Awareness. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Publishing, 1994.

Touchphonics Reading Systems. Touch Phonics: The Manipulative Multi-Sensory Phonics System. Newport Beach, CA.

Waterford Institute. Waterford Early Reading Program. Fremont, CA.

Yopp, H. K. "Developing Phonemic Awareness in Young Children". The Reading Teacher, 45, 696-703, 1992.

Institute for Education Reform
California State University, Sacramento
6000 J Street
Sacramento, CA 95819-6018

tel 916.278.4600
fax 916.278.5014

Sue Burr, co-director
Dustin Johnson, electronic support