Fall Semester 2010
description: The rise of the
analytic tradition in contemporary Anglo-American philosophy
represents a turn toward common sense, science, language,
logic and rigor. Readings will cover the philosophical
movements of common sense, logical atomism, logical
positivism, ordinary language philosophy and more recent
analytical philosophy. 3 units.
Prerequisites: There are no prerequisite courses,
although it is recommended that this not be your first
course in philosophy. The Modern Philosophy course is the best course to have taken.
Contemporary Analytic and Linguistic Philosophies, Second Edition,
edited by E. D. Klemke, Prometheus Books, 2000. There will be a few additional required articles either handed out in class or to be read on the Internet.
Grades: Three homework assignments (17% each), an essay (19%), a final exam (25%) and class participation (5%). The essay will be a seven-page argumentative essay, typed double-spaced. Depth of philosophical insight and quality of argumentation are the paramount factors in the grades on the essay and on the homeworks, but English writing skill is also a significant factor. The comprehensive final exam is open book and open notes.
Professor: My office is in Mendocino Hall, room 3022, and my weekly office hours will be announced in class on the first day. Feel free to stop by at any of those times, or to call. If those hours are inconvenient for you, then I can arrange an appointment for an alternative time. You may send me e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org or call my office at 278-7384 or the Philosophy Department Office at 278-6424. The fastest way to contact me is by email. My personal web page is at http://www.csus.edu/indiv/d/dowdenb/index.htm
Student outcome goals: The hope is that by the end of the semester you will have achieved the following goals:
Late assignments, and make-up assignments: I realize that during your college career you occasionally may be unable to complete an assignment on time. If this happens in our course, contact me as soon as you are able. If you provide a good reason for missing a test or homework assignment (illness, accident, etc.), then I'll use your grade on the final exam as your missing grade. There will be no make-up tests nor make-up homework. I do accept late assignments with a grade penalty of one-third of a letter grade per 24-hour period beginning at the class time the assignment is due. Examples. If you turn in the assignment a few hours after it is due, then your A becomes an A-. Instead, if you turn in the same assignment 30 hours late, then your A becomes a B+. Weekends count, so turn in your late work by email if possible (no need to follow up with a paper copy). No late work will be accepted after the answer sheet has been handed out (often this will be at the next class meeting) nor after the answers are discussed in class, even if you weren't in class that day.
Add-Drop: To add the course, if the course is full, then send me an email about signing up on the waiting list. To drop the course during the first two weeks, do it online. No paperwork is required. After the first two weeks, it is harder to drop, and a departmental form is required, the "Petition to Add/Drop After Deadline." As with any university course, make sure you are dropped officially (by the university computer system, or by the instructor, or by the Philosophy Department secretary); don't simply walk away into the ozone or else you will get a "WU" grade for the course, which is counted as an "F" in computing your GPA (grade point average).
Emergencies: If we have a long-term emergency, for example, an influenza health emergency, then our course will continue by email and the Internet. You'll be contacted at your university email address.
The sentence, "All bachelors are unmarried," is said to be analytic (or analytically true) because it is made true just by how we use words. That sense of "analytic" is not the sense that concerns us in this course.
Our course will survey the major movements of 20th century British and American analytic philosophy. In that century, analytic philosophy became the dominant way that philosophy was done in English-speaking countries, and it remains so today. You are probably already familiar with that style of philosophy even if you weren't told that it is called "analytic." Depending on which instructors you've had in your other courses, it's even possible that you've never seen any 20th or 21st century philosophy that was not analytic.
[You aren't required to read any of the following articles linked in this section of the syllabus called "Course Description."] Analytic philosophy was born out of revolt against what the analytic philosophers considered to be the harmful influence of the 19th century philosophers Hegel and Nietzsche and their opaque, bizarre, vague, and speculative methods of doing philosophy. The revolutionaries turned toward common sense, science, language, logic, and rigor. This turn away from the influence of Hegel and Nietzsche would have been somewhat attractive to the earlier British empiricists Locke, Berkeley and Hume.
The term "analytic philosophy" has no precise definition, but analytic philosophers are primarily distinguished because they emphasize careful arguing and justifying when approaching any philosophical problem. The analytic philosopher is quick to ask "What do you mean by that claim?" and to demand reasons for accepting or rejecting the claim. They emphasize knowing what the claim logically implies, and what noteworthy positions imply the claim. They ask, "What would strengthen the claim?" and "What would count as refuting it?" and "Isn't this a difficulty?" Non-analytic philosophers are less apt to do this. On the point about careful arguing, the analytic philosopher would be opposed to the metaphysical work of the 20th century philosopher Alfred North Whitehead who does metaphysics by using the "I'm telling you" method in which he reveals his insights rather than argues for them.
Analytic philosophy has no agreed upon specific doctrines (example: be an empiricist) or problems (example: decide whether God exists) or even methods (example: apply symbolic logic where possible). Instead, the analytic tradition shows itself in the tendencies of its practitioners. Analytic philosophy tends to aim at truth and knowledge rather than moral or spiritual improvement. Most analytic philosophers like to investigate language (John Rawls being a noteworthy exception), and most emphasize the analysis of concepts and of statements in order to remove ambiguity and vagueness so that the claim of interest can be understood well enough to be accepted or rejected. Analytic philosophy does not reject work on the big, perrenial questions of philosophy, but it is more accepting of the value of careful, small-scale philosophical investigations.
Analytic philosophers have a style of doing philosophy that is often marked by relative clarity, terseness, respect for the findings of empirical science, attention to detail, frequent use of symbolic logic, and valuing the study of the meaning of key concepts and words and sentences. The methods and aims of many analytic philosophers give a higher priority to logical and epistemological analysis than is given by opposing camps of non-analytic philosophy.
The opposing camps are phenomenology, deconstructivism, existentialism, hermeneutics, postmodernism, structuralism, German idealism, absolute idealism, dialectical materialism, neo-Thomism, neo-Kantianism, and neo-Marxism. The group of all these philosophical camps is loosely described as "continental philosophy." Contemporary Western philosophy notoriously contains an analytic/continental division, with the analytic side dominating among anglo-American philosophers although it is rapidly growing in popularity in Germany.
But the division is not sharp. It is possible to pursue, say hermeneutics, in an analytic style even though the vast majority of hermeneuticists do not. Husserl, the father of pheneomenology, is more analytic than his followers, such as Heidegger.
The analytic/continental divide is reflected in two writing styles. Analytic philosophers emphasize economical expression of thought. They would not be expected to use monstrously long sentences the way Kant did or the way the German philosopher Habermas does. Nor would they use rhetorical flourishes and plays on words, like those used by the French postmodernist Deleuze. Then there are what analytic philosophers call the excesses of purposefully trying to be obscure, a sin that seems to be committed by the French deconstructionist Jacques Derrida and the contemporary French feminists Luce Irigaray and Julie Kristeva. Unfortunately, postmodernist prose is eclectic, ironic, and hostile to linear narrative.
So, here's what we will be doing:
Because pragmatism is considered to be a pre-analytic tradition it will receive only minor attention in our course. Formal logic (aka symbolic logic) is frequently used by analytic philosophers to clarify philosophical positions, but it, too, will not get much attention in our course.
A final thought from Albert Einstein in 1934: "Bear in mind that the wonderful things you learn in your schools are the work of many generations, produced by enthusiastic effort and infinite labor in every country of the world. All this is put into your hands as your inheritance in order that you may receive it, honor it, add to it, and one day faithfully hand it on to your children."
Weekly list of topics and assignments: See the list.
Contact me at email@example.com if you would like more information about the course.
The web address of this file is