Child Development 138 (03) - Hembree
Social and Emotional Development
California State University, Sacramento
Spring, 2011 

 

Modern Theoretical Approaches

 

I.  Biological perspectives

A.     Ethology

1.  Assumptions

 

 

 

 

2.  As applied to human development

 - -  innate behaviors as well as a predisposition to learn particular things

 

 - -  behavior is adaptive and ensures survival

 

 

 - - early experience important - critical (sensitive) periods  

 

 

 --  methodology, e.g.,  

 

-- ethogram    

 

 

-- deprivation study  

 

 

 

          3.  Examples:

  • Attachment - Bowlby  

 

 

 

 

  • Peer relations  - Dominance hierarchies 

 

 

 

 

 

4.      Evaluation

 

 

 

 

 

B.     Behavior-genetics

1.  Assumptions

 

 

 

 

2. Methodology

·   family studies (twin study, adoption study)    

 

 

 

3. Estimates of genetic contribution  

-  Concordance rates

 

 

 

 

- Heritability coefficients

 

 

 

 

 

   4.  Problems with behavior-genetics approach

 

 

 

C.  Gene/Environment Interactions (Scarr & McCartney, 1983)

1. Passive

 

 

2. Evocative 

 

3. Active/niche-picking

 

 

  4.   A developmental perspective

    

 

 

II. Bronfenbrenner - Bio-Ecological approach

 A.   Importance of person, process and context

 

 

 

           B.  Series of nested systems  

 

·        Microsystem  

 

 

·        Mesosystem  

 

 

·        Exosystem  

 

 

·        Macrosystem  

 

 

           

C.   Family as context

 

 

 

 

 

D. Natural experiments

 

 

 

 E. Role of biology and proximal processes

 

 

 

III. Cognitive Perspectives

A.  Vygotsky

1. Assumptions

 

 

2 . Differences between Vygotsky and Piaget

·        the role of play  

 

 

·        the role of language (as our social tool)  

 

 

 

·        the role of adults/peers  

 

 

      3.  Processes

 

 

     4. Evaluation

 

   

 

B.  Social Information Processing

1 . Assumptions

  • Focus on mental processes associated with social situations ; like any other cognitive process  

 

 

  • thinking influences social behavior

   

 

2. Example: Guerra & Slaby

 

 

 

 

3. Evaluation

 

 

 

 

Back to top

 

Send problems, comments or suggestions to: hembrees@csus.edu

California State University, Sacramento
College of Education
Department of Child Development

Updated: January, 2011

Back to top