california state university, sacramento  

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

I. Two theories on online pedagogy
A. The Instructive Approach
B. The constructive approach
C. The Instructive approach or the constructive approach?
D. Useful resources

II. The online instructional approaches that I have implemented in my daily teaching
A. Teaching and learning environment for the 1st year Japanese language course
B. My online pedagogy
a. Online quizzes & exercises: An example of the instructive approach
b. Exploring Japanese culture using discussion board: An example of the constructive approach

III. Students’ comments and survey data
A. Survey questions
B. Survey results
C. Then, which online pedagogy is better, the instructive or constructive approach?
D. What other factors are important when we integrate technology into our daily teaching?

home :


II. The online instructional approaches that I have implemented in my daily teaching

A. Teaching and learning environment for the 1st year Japanese language course.
B. My online pedagogy
     a. Online quizzes and exercises: An example of the instructive approach
     b. Exploring Japanese culture using discussion board: An example of the constructive approach

A. Teaching and learning environment for the first year Japanese language course

     The first year Japanese language courses (5 units) meet four times. Since the university is on a semester system (16 weeks), the total instruction time was approximately 80 hours. Classes are held in a “Smart Classroom” twice a week, and the Foreign Language Teaching Lab twice a week. So my class is defined as "Web-enhanced Japanese language course."
     For more information, click here for the first year Japanese language course syllabus, semester schedule, weekly schedules (Week 1 & Lesson 1).

a. Smart classroom

     A “Smart Classroom” is a room equipped with an overhead display projector and a network connection. The Smart Classroom enabled me to display PowerPoint presentations, demonstrate WebCT features, present Internet resources, show streaming videos with audio, and play course-related CDs and DVDs. I use PowerPoint daily in the Smart Classroom. The purpose of using PowerPoint was not just to present a slideshow, but to use each slide as a springboard for related discussions and activities. The slides usually contained the following: a) lesson overview; b) model conversation; c) review (vocabulary, grammar patterns, exercises, etc.); d) target expressions of the day; e) exercises (instruction & visual cues); and f) summary of the lesson. Click HERE for picture.

b. Foreign language teaching lab

     The foreign language teaching lab is equipped with thirty personal computers (PCs) that allow each student to have his or her own station. It is networked with Information & Communication Manager (ICM), and Diva©e Duo. ICM allows teachers to access, monitor and customize student computer activities to each student’s individual needs, and group students together for particular tasks. Diva©e Duo is a digital two-track recorder, with many unique features designed especially for language learning. Each PC has Japanese language fonts installed that enable students to read and write Japanese. At the teaching lab, the following activities are usually conducted: a) listening practice, b) pronunciation practice, c) oral practice with random partners, d) voice recording, simultaneous oral tests (recording and collecting the voice at once), and e) multimedia viewing at individual stations. Click HERE for picture.

c. Web Course Tool (WebCT) 

     Web Course Tool (WebCT) is a course management system that is implemented by more than 2,500 institutions in 81 countries around the world (WebCT, 2002). In the Japanese language course, the students are required to log on WebCT at least twice a week in the teaching lab. Since all my Japanese courses are created with the UTF-8 encoding feature enabled, course content could be displayed in both Japanese and English. This also gave the students the capability to type in Japanese within WebCT’s e-mail and discussion board. I developed the following nine content areas on WebCT: (1) Getting Started (greeting, syllabus, class orientation material) ; (2) Calendar (school and local events); (3) Class Content (lesson-by-lesson on-line daily schedule, assignment posting, class presentation & handouts, audio files for practices); (4) On-line Quizzes, Exercises (simple multiple choices and type-in answers, and student surveys); (5) Discussion Board (internet search activities); (6) Students Homepage (developing e-portfolio); (7) Students’ Gradebook; (8) Mail; and (9) Games (Online Interactive Japanese language exercises). Click HERE for picture.

d. Usagi-chan’s Genki Resource Page

     In the summer of 2003, Andrea-san developed an interactive on-line resource page called “Usagi-chan’s Genki Resource Page” with my help. The web page contains: (1) technology tips (e.g. how to install Japanese fonts), (2) web-based exercises for newly introduced vocabulary and verb conjugation, (3) lesson-by-lesson vocabulary sheets with stroke-order movies, and (4) games that are designed to enhance their learning. Technologies used include PHP server-side scripting and a MySQL database. This webpage is open to the public, but I also use the site for my daily teaching. I directly linked my on-line daily schedule to a specific exercise on this web page. I also created WebCT quizzes and exercises using the data extracted from the MySQL database in Usagi-chan’s page. Creating online quizzes and exercises using MySQL database has helped me tremendously because I can make each quiz and exercise for a couple of minutes. I usually create 50+ online exercises for each Japanese language course such as “L1-7 Genki vocabulary exercises,” “Ultimate vocabulary Quiz on Genki Vol.1” for the second year students, and Kanji review exercises on Genki Vol. I & II” for the third year students. My students can take these quizzes as many times as they like during the assigned period, and their grades automatically go into their Gradebook.

Top

B. My online pedagogy

     In this section, I would like to describe my online pedagogical approach step by step. I chose two online activities: online quizzes & exercises as an example of the instructive approach and exploring Japanese culture using discussion board as that of the constructive approach.

a. Online quizzes and exercises: An example of the instructive approach

     The purpose of online quizzes and exercises is to engage students to practice the target vocabulary, kanji, conjugations, and grammar points and build up their basic knowledge (skill-getting) for application (skill-using). I also create these exercises to help students to be successful when they take paper and pencil vocabulary, kanji, and grammar quizzes in class. In addition, I wanted to reduce the time to correct quizzes/exercises that do not require much feedback from me. The following is the specific steps to create online exercises using WebCT and my typical pedagogical approaches.Click HERE for picture

Step 1: Create database using PHP server-side scripting and a MySQL database

     The instructor determines what should be on the database. Usagi-chan’s database include vocabulary, kanji, and verb conjugation (ba-form, passive form, etc.). These are largely based on textbook exercises for the first and second year.

Step 2: Create question-answer database

     Possible format choices are multiple choice, matching, calculated, short answer, & paragraph. I usually use multiple choice for vocabulary and kanji and short answers for verb conjugation.

Step 3: Determine quiz setting and delivery system

  • Create a quiz/exercise title
  • Determine its point, the number of questions, and select appropriate questions from the database for the quiz/exercise
  • Set up the question delivery method
         On WebCT, there are three options: (1) deliver all the questions at once; (2) deliver one question at a time, where any question can be revisited; and (3) deliver on question at a time, where students must answer or skip each question to proceed. Once a question has been answered or skipped it cannot be revisited. I usually use (1) & (2).
  • Decide the quiz duration.
         When I administrate a 20 multiple-choice vocabulary and kanji exercises, I usually set up the duration of the quiz for 3-4 minutes. For type-in exercises or other demanding exercises, the quiz duration is 5-10 minutes. I disallow students’ answer submission if time has expired.
  • Decide the number of attempts
         There are several options: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and unlimited attempts. I usually select “unlimited” for vocabulary, kanji, and conjugation exercises. Since these exercises require students to answer quickly and the order and kinds of questions are randonized, it is hard for them to look up their answers in the textbook or talk to their classmates while taking them. Because the quiz time is short, many students tend to take quizzes over and over again as if they are playing games.
         I believe that this setting is also helpful to students who need more time to learn Japanese. Last semester, a student took each quiz more than 20 times. This “unlimited” quizzes and exercises helped this student build up his confidence, and his efforts were eventually paid off by getting full points at the end.
          The difficult quizzes that require more critical thinking have a limited access (3-5 times). I usually provide the answers and explanations why some answers are not appropriate. The limited attempts tend to engage students to read my explanations on the web and reflect upon their own mistakes.
  • Set up availability.
         WebCT enables the instructor to decide when and how long these quizzes/exercises are available to students. I open lesson-based exercises while they are learning the lesson. I always close them at 11:55 pm on the first day of the next lesson. It is less confusing for students if the closing dates follow a sort of pattern.
  • Think about the issue of security.
         I set up a password for quizzes that require supervision while taking. For the quizzes and exercises that students have unlimited access, I usually do not require students to enter password.
  • Determine a scoring system.
         If multiple attempts are allowed, the instructor can determine a scoring system for the student's grade. The options are: first time, latest, average score, and highest score. I use the highest score for most of exercises-based quizzes because I want my students to practice as many times as they want to. This also helps students who score low in paper and pencil quizzes to raise their overall quiz scores.

Step 4: Implementation

     I usually show what sorts of quizzes and exercises were posted on WebCT during the class and lab. During the lab, I spent 75 - 80% of the time on instruction and oral exercises using the Diva©e program (random pair practice). For the remaining time, students can work by themselves. Most of time, students are taking online quizzes & exercises, checking schedules and related sites, playing language learning games, and developing their own homepage in Japanese. Since I post these quizzes and exercises at multiple places on WebCT, students know what they are supposed to do by when. Occasionally, I email students to keep up taking online quizzes and exercises.

Students responses

     In the past three year survey, students perceived online quizzes and exercises the most beneficial online activity (See III. Students’ comments and survey data). The following is a random list of students’ comments on online exercises and quizzes.

  • The quizzes were the most helpful when they were on the computer. They gave me a better grade than the written ones. The written quizzes were a bit difficult because they didn't jog my memory but they were helpful if given enough time to study for it.
  • (I like) the ability to go through exercises over and over.
  • It was easy to understand the ones that can be taken over and over. To see what went wrong.
  • I found the quizzes and exercises because it helps me to understand what I should work on and what I know
  • I think the WebCT in class quizzes and exercises were crucial to my success in the class as well.
  • The practice quizzes and tests were difficult to finish because my internet disconnects so often.
  • I most benefited from the practice quizzes. They helped me to see the words and learn from my mistakes.
  • The quizzes are most beneficial since, you can see what you did wrong and keep correcting yourself till you learn from all your mistakes.
  • The quizzes, vocabulary and kanji quizzes helped. The review quizzes helped me to guess what the test would be like.
  • The online exercises were helpful but there were so many of them that sometimes I forgot to do them, which lowered my grade.

My thoughts on these quizzes

     These online exercises are supplementary activities for students to be successful in paper-and-pencil quizzes and exams as well as hand-written assignments.
     As a designer, I ask myself the following questions:

  • Are these quizzes and exercises accessible to all students?
  • Is the content of quizzes too easy or too hard?
  • Is the amount of quizzes and exercises appropriate to my students, of whom majority work and have a heavy study load?
  • Are these exercises really helpful to their learning?
  • Do students enjoy taking these quizzes?

     When I do not have good answers to these questions, I talk to students and often conduct simple anonymous and non-anonymous surveys.Then, I change the content and/or the delivery method accordingly. In a way, I am employing the constructive approach in the development of these quizzes.
     As a teacher, I feel that the system of these online quizzes and exercises has served as a reliable (free) tutor that helps students anytime and anywhere. I significantly reduced the amount of paper used for quizzes and hours spent on grading those quizzes. I can focus more on the tasks that students need my assistance.


Top

b. Exploring Japanese culture using discussion board as that of the constructive approach

     The culture project using technology requires students to conduct research on a selected topic using the Internet and then to post their findings on WebCT's Discussion board. This project allows students to explore their personal interest in Japanese culture freely, build knowledge of Japanese culture with their classmates collaboratively, and reflect upon their own learning critically without overwhelming students’ workload.
     In this section, I describe an Internet search project on “Dos and Don’ts in Japan” in the Spring of 2004. Table 1 shows the steps, students’ tasks, and teacher’s tasks of the culture project using technology.

 
Students’ tasks
Teacher’s tasks

Needs assessment
  • State their interests in Japanese culture and society
  • Take a survey on students’ interests in Japanese culture and society.
  • Select 3 topics (e.g. food, movie, customs and manners)
Pre-Internet search activity
  • Analyze 36 illustrations of “ugly” behaviors of both Japanese and Americans
  • Discuss with classmates
  • Read the instruction for the posting carefully and begin to plan what and when to post regarding Japanese manners and customs
  • Engage students in the selected topic through classroom activities (e.g. illustration/pictures, discussion, reading)
  • Post a topic and specific instructions on online schedule & Discussion Board with the due date: “Begin your internet search on Japanese manners and customs. Use a search engine find something of interest to you about it (e.g. eye contact, greeting, gift giving) and report back to the class via WebCT's Discussion board….”
  • Announce the posting in the Smart Classroom and Lab and demonstrate how to find the information
Internet search activity
  • Conduct Internet search with results posted on Discussion Board, using students’ L1 outside of class time
    (1) Search word (s)
    (2) Website address
    (3) Information
    (4) Importance and relevancy to their lives
    (5) A question for an exam in a multiple-choice or true-false format, with the correct answer indicated
    (* French Professor Laurette Suter at CSUS shared me with this approach.)
  • Take online quiz
  • Assess the postings of their own and classmates by posting their critical and reflective comments
  • Assist and monitor Internet search activity by contacting individual via email; modeling what “good” research and questions; acknowledging students who write original and intellectual postings; and facilitating students evaluation of their own posting
  • Making online quiz (password protected & limited time) using students’ generated questions
  • Create 2-3 discussion questions to let students evaluate the validity of their research (e.g. Choose the most educational posting and state the reason(s) for your choice)
Post-Internet search activity
  • Perform role play (S’s target language)
  • Make a ‘Dos and Don’ts in Japan’ poster (S’s target language)
  • Develop Students’ Homepage (S’s target language)
  • Write a reflective essay about their learning (Ss’ L1)
  • Give advices on ‘Do’s and Don’ts in Japan’ to their friends as an expert (Ss’ L1)
  • Analyze case studies on cross-cultural conflicts (Ss’ L1)
  • Give several tasks, which students can apply what they learned through Internet search activity and reflect upon their learning experience.

Table 1. Culture project using technology: Steps, students’ tasks, and teacher’s tasks.
Example task: Japanese customs and manners – “Dos” and “Don’ts” in Japan.

Step 1: Needs Assessment

     At the beginning of each semester, I took a survey of the students’ interests in Japanese culture and society, and selected three topics. Past topics have included geography, places, food, pop-culture, products, music, movies, and customs.

Step 2: Pre-Internet search activity

     Before the Internet search activity, I conducted several activities (“pre-Internet search activity”) in class and via WebCT to engage students in the task. For example, when students were asked to conduct a research on Japanese customs and manners, I showed a number of illustrations on gestures and manners, which could be viewed as “ugly” from Japanese and American perspectives, and had students discuss why those gestures and manners were offensive in different cultural settings.

Step 3: Main Task

     In the main task (“Internet search activity”), students were asked to use a search engine to find something of interest to them on a selected topic, and report back to the class via WebCT Discussions. This main task was conducted independently outside of class time. The students’ report included (1) search word(s), (2) the website address, (3) the information, (4) the importance and relevancy to their lives, and (5) a question for an exam in a multiple-choice or true-false format, with the correct answer indicated. To substantiate this activity, I informed students that their research findings would be used as questions in major exams (10 - 20% out of 100). Thus, the materials that students produced were compiled and used as the study guide. See a list of postings, student’s posting and poster (1) & (2), and Discussion Board on WebCT homepage.
     Before and during the Internet search activity, I showed examples to assist students in conducting their tasks successfully. I asked students what characterizes “good” research questions and provided opportunities for students to reflect their research critically. I praised students who came up with thoughtful and intellectual questions, and contacted the individuals who needed more assistance via email (scaffolding and guiding).
     To assess the students’ learning, I employed several approaches. For each Internet search, I first created an online exam based on the students’ questions to test knowledge gained through the Internet search, and then asked students to choose the “best” research and discuss the reasons for their choice on the Discussion board. In addition, the students were instructed to analyze problem-solving situations and post their solution to the Discussion board.

Step 4: Post-internet search activities

     Post-Internet search activities included role-play, poster making, and student homepages in the target language (Japanese), and essay writing and case studies analysis in English. Some activities were conducted during class time and others were done outside of class time. These post-Internet search activities were aimed to provide students opportunities to apply their gained knowledge and integrate their cultural learning in their language learning.
     The primary language for the teacher’s instruction and students’ postings was English. It was not practical for the novice level learners to express their research findings using the intermediate and advanced level of the Japanese language. In addition to offering students an opportunity to gain cultural knowledge, the purpose of this culture project was to facilitate students’ independent learning using Internet and collaborative learning by building and sharing knowledge. This project also aimed to rejuvenate motivation especially for those linguistically weak, but cognitively advanced students, who might be able to contribute to the class through sociologically-oriented research in their language. While allowing the use of the native language to conduct research, I incorporated the target language whenever possible. For example, in the post-Internet search activities, students were encouraged to use the target language only, especially for in class role plays and the student homepages on WebCT.

Students response

     At the end of each semester, to investigate the impact of this Internet cultural projet based on the constructive approach, online surveys and interviews were conducted and reflective essays were collected. The following three themes were emerged: Knowledge building; community building; and Increasing Motivation.

Knowledge building

     The culture projects have created opportunities for students to expose themselves to a great deal of information on Japanese culture through not only his or her own research, but also the postings of his or her classmates. In a class of thirty students in which each student conducted research three times a semester, there were ninety postings. Students stated: “The amounts of things that I picked up were surprising to me, who knew that such a small country would hold such an abundant amount of culture and history“; “…They (culture projects) introduced new topics and subject matters that we probably have never researched on our own”; and “I have the whole information on Japan within my finger tip.”
     A number of students’ comments on their learning outcomes have led to the conclusion that the culture projects were not simply information gathering activities, but meaningful exploratory activities to discover a fascinating culture from various perspectives. Their comments include: “This exercise have opened my eyes to reasons why the Japanese do and say some of the things they do”; “I think we got a representation of a variety of things from different perspectives that increased the curiosity so you’ll want to examine more of the culture. ” A student saw this learning experience as a spring-board for the further learning, saying “I now have a foundation of knowledge I can build from.” Another student reflected on this whole learning experience, saying “I will be more understanding and tolerant of other cultures. This class has made me realize that America is not the only place on earth. There are thousands of different cultures all over the world. Within each of these cultures come a different way of life and thought.”

Community building

     A student wrote, “These exercises not only allowed us to learn about the culture but they allowed us to learn about our classmates and ourselves as well. You can get a sense of people’s personalities and interest by reading what kinds of topics they wrote about.” Another wrote, “Finding the information on this and reading what others had found was very interesting to me.” Because students were free to choose any subject within the assigned topics, each posting consequently showed some of the personality of each student. The variety of postings created many opportunities to interact with each other: “It created another avenue to interact with fellow students and develop a relationship that I will miss next year.” It seems that the Discussion board turned into a sort of after-class “cyber café,” where students could get to know each other and share their interests and knowledge about Japan genuinely: “These exercises were an interactive way to encourage the whole class to participate in learning outside of the classroom.”
     The sense of comradeship has promoted active and collaborative learning: “If we had any problems with the exercise, we had more than enough chances to ask the teacher or our fellow classmates for help.”
Many students felt that they were comfortable with other students and learned from other students. Although there were many other types of collaborative activities such as role-plays and paired activities, the culture projects could be viewed as a major collaborative activity since the postings of their classmates served as the learning sources and the students were expected to act as knowledge providers to their classmates. Thus, the culture projects created a strong learning community, which facilitated active collaborative learning among students.

Increasing Motivation

     A majority of students (over 80%) indicated that they enjoyed the class activities, and viewed their learning experiences as beneficial to their lives. The culture projects were not the only factor that might have contributed to such overwhelming positive responses, but they seems to “trigger” students to want to study more about Japanese language and culture: “I know after doing a lot of the research I have become even more interested and motivated in learning the Japanese language. It just adds more reason and interest to my continuation of learning the language”; “These cultural exercises have made learning Japanese fun. It has made me want to learn Japanese for my own benefit rather than fulfill the requirement for foreign language”; and “These exercises helped me understand Japanese culture more. They made learning Japanese more fun. They also made learning Japanese seem more real. More real in that they showed that there is so much more to a country than its language.”
     In the interview, the students showed their intrinsic fondness and respect towards Japanese culture, which they regarded as fundamentally “good,” “desirable,” or “worthwhile.” The interviewees were not able to define or pinpoint the origin of their preference; yet, it was evident that some students began to be driven by a deep fascination with the Japanese people and culture. A student commented: “In taking Japanese these last two semesters, I can tell you this. A year ago, I wanted to learn the language because I liked it. Now? Well, now I want to learn more of the language because I love it.”

Dilemma and challenges

     There were two types of comments on the learning of the Japanese language through the culture projects: (1) in some cases they learned language; and (2) in some cases they did not. What they learned were key phrases and identified essential cultural vocabulary. Some stated that the knowledge gained through these exercises indirectly helped their language learning. A student said, “While I do not believe that studying these various culture aspects of Japan have directly aided my learning or usage of the Japanese language, they have helped me to better understand the culture that is speaking it…” Due to the use of the students’ L1 as the medium to conduct the research, it seems that the acquisition of the Japanese language had not been facilitated significantly.
     It is ideal to use the target language as a tool of instruction, not just the object of instruction. To facilitate language acquisition, it is critical to incorporate the target language in instruction and research itself because students’ intrinsic motivation to make sense of the world provides the impetus and vehicle for language acquisition. The need to understand, to participate in meaningful and purposeful life activities, provides both the motivation and channel for language learning. On the other hand, the extensive use of the target language at the initial stage of learning may overburden students, whose intrinsic interests and curiosity may in turn be diminished. For some students, these culture projects will no longer feel like “enjoyable” exercises, but change into “demanding” exercises. Instead of using the culture projects as a “hook” to the language learning, many students may find the learning of the Japanese language too difficult and troublesome.
     As Lier (2004) stated, the challenge of project-based learning is how to incorporate more target language in the process in project-based learning. The ultimate decision has to come from classroom practitioners. In most cases, practitioners including myself fell into this dilemma. A sense of guilt emerges when instructors allow students to use their L1 because it is against to current theories of teaching, which emphasize meaningful usages of the target language through teaching content. A sense of skepticism emerges when instructors use extensive amount of the target language in foreign language teaching context because many beginning students have little understanding of the content.

Final remarks for cultural project

     Omaggio (1986) stated that cultural understanding must be promoted in various ways so that students are prepared to live more harmoniously in the target-language community (p.36). This study shows a way to expose various aspects of the target culture that the learners want to learn more about it on their terms. This study revealed that the culture projects using technology helped students to gain knowledge, motivated students for further learning, and created a sense of community among students. On the other hand, it was questionable how much these activities contributed to the acquisition of the target language among students.
     Then, in what way, could we promote the acquisition of the target language at the beginning level course? First, choosing more linguistically oriented topics may help students learn vocabulary (e.g. “The meaning of kanji letters,” “Japanese proverbs,” etc.). Secondly, it is critical to link content knowledge that students gained through the culture projects to the teaching of language whenever applicable grammar patterns are introduced. For example, in geography and food topics, students learn that Osaka is famous for Okonomiyaki (Japanese style pizza). When a grammar pattern of “famous for” is introduced, students should be encouraged to connect their content knowledge and language by saying “Osaka wa okonomiyaki de yuumei desu (Osaka is famous for Okonomiyaki).” Thirdly, the target language needs to be integrated more with the process of instruction and in a manageable manner. It may be effective to provide the bilingual instruction at the beginning, but later the instruction should be gradually shifted in the target language in comprehensible manners. Fourthly, the Internet search activity alone may lead to the creation of some culture stereotypes. It is critical to develop meaningful post-Internet search activities to reflect upon their learning and apply what they learned in problem-solving contexts (e.g. Quiz shows on cultural topics in the target language).
     Lastly this framework of culture projects could be easily applied to the advanced level of learners. At the advanced level, it is possible to develop a course based on subject matter, provide instruction in the target language, use search engines of the target language, and conduct pre- and post- Internet search activities in the target language.

Bibliography

Galloway, V. (1992). Toward a cultural reading of authentic texts. In H. Byrnes (Ed.),
Languages for a multicultural world in transition (pp. 87-121). Lincolnwood, IL:
National Textbook Company.

Lafayette, R. 1988. Integrating the teaching of culture into the foreign language classroom.
In Allan J. Singerman (Ed.), Towards a new integration of language and culture.
Reports of the Northeast Conference on the teaching of foreign languages.
Middlebury, VT: The Northeast Conference.

Lafayette, R., and Schulz, R. (1975). The culture revolution in foreign language teaching: a
guide for building the modern curriculum. Selected papers from 1975 Central States
Conference. Skokie, Illinois: National Textbook.

Lier, L. (2004). The Bellman’s map: Avoiding the “perfect and absolute blank” in language
learning. Presentation at Conference: Content, Tasks and Projects in the Language
Classroom: May 17 at Monterey Institute of International Studies, Monterey, California.

Masuyama, Kazue. (2004). Innovative culture learning projects using technolog. A paper submitted to a conference, Content, Tasks, and Projects in the Language Classroom, Monterey Institute of International Studies, Monterey, CA, May 16-18, 2004

Masuyama, K. and Shea, A. (2004). Another year of successful integration of technology:A Case Study of a First Year Japanese Language Course [CD]. Papers presented at ED-MEDIA 2004. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (www.aace.org).

Masuyama, K. and Shea, A. (2003). Successful Integration of Technology? A Case Study of
a First Year Japanese Language Course [CD]. Papers presented at ED-MEDIA 2003. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (www.aace.org).

National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. (1999). Standards for foreign
language learning in the 21st century. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press, Inc.

Nostrand, H.L. (1967). A second culture: New imperative for American education. In
Michel, J. Foreign Language Teaching: An anthology. London: Collier-MacMIllan.

Nostrand, H.L. (1974). Empathy for a second culture: Motivations and techniques. In Jarvis,
G.A. (ed), Responding to new realities. ACTFL foreign language education series,
vol. 5. Skokie, Illinois: National Textbook.

Omaggio, A. (1986). Teaching language in context: Proficiency-oriented instruction.
Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Richards, J. and Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching
(Second Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seelye, H. 1984. Teaching culture: Strategies for intercultural communication. Revised
edition. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.

Stryker, S. & Leaver, B (Eds). (1997). Content-based instruction in foreign language
education: Models and methods. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Top

 

 

 

 

 
top of page