|
|
The accountability office said the videos "constitute covert
propaganda" because the government was not identified as the source of the
materials, which were distributed by the Office of National Drug Control
Policy. They were broadcast by nearly 300 television stations
and reached 22 million households, the office said.
The accountability office does not have law enforcement powers, but its decisions
on federal spending are usually considered
authoritative.
In May the office found that the Bush
administration had violated the same law by producing television news segments
that portrayed the new Medicare law as a boon to the elderly.
The accountability office was not critical of the content of the video
segments from the White House drug office, but found that the format - a
made-for-television "story package" - violated the prohibition on
using taxpayer money for propaganda.
Representative Henry A. Waxman of
A spokesman for the drug policy office said the
review's conclusions made a "mountain out of a molehill."
The spokesman, Tom Riley, noted that Congress had
authorized the drug policy office to fashion antidrug
messages in motion pictures and television programming and on the Internet. His
office stopped distributing the antidrug videos after
the G.A.O. report on the Medicare segments, Mr. Riley said, and never acted unlawfully.
The drug policy office told investigators that it would have been difficult
for "a reasonable broadcaster" to mistake the videos for independent
news reports.
But the G.A.O. said the drug policy office
"made it impossible for the targeted viewing audience to ascertain that
these stories were produced by the government."
Federal law prohibits the use of federal money for "publicity or
propaganda purposes" not authorized by Congress. The accountability office
has found that federal agencies violated this restriction when they distributed
editorials and newspaper articles written by government officials without
identifying them.
The accountability office said the administration's misuse of federal money
"also constitutes a violation of the Antideficiency
Act," which prohibits spending in excess of appropriations.