Concept Attainment

 

Strategy Rubric

Objectives

 

Objectives and Assignments

Strategy Description

Strategy Template

Student Examples

Strategy Rubric

Comparing Models

Resources

Syllabus

Calendar


Concept Attainment


eeeee

Fully Developed

Satisfactory

Weak Development

Choice of Concept for development in Concept Attainment

The concept is clearly a building block in the area of study and is necessary for students to understand subsequent materials. The concept was chosen because it has caused learners confusion in the past however it is a developmentally appropriate concept.

Concept is a necessary part of the curriculum.

Concept seems "easy" with either one attribute or obvious attributes. Seems likely that students would either already know the concept or would learn it easily in the context of learning without the use of the concept attainment model.

Examplars

Multiple examplars, both positive and negative. Exemplars are juxaposed to help students discover the significant attributes, clear order of presentation; solid, clear examples are offered first. "Iffy" examples are saved for later in the strategy and are pondered over and offer clarification of the concept. Complete set of exemplars which reflect all of the critical attributes.

Solid examples, predictable outcomes (the set may based on single attributes), numerous exemplars are offered, order of presentation is clear.

Some of the exemplars lack clarity, unclear choices, exemplars may not illustrate the most critical attributes, order may be unclear.

Statement of essential attributes and name

Teacher and students clearly state the attributes that are essentials. Recorded on the board or chart, more than one way for the students to see the attributes (orally, written etc.) Specific name is given.

Teacher states the attributes and name. Students may or may not.

Confusion over the specific attributes. Full set may not be present.

Student generation of other examples

Students are asked to generate other examples. Students may be asked to individually record and support their answers.

Generation of examples in a group setting. The group understands, individual examples may not be present.

A few examples generated or suggested, little discussion

Students examine thinking processes, metacognition

Students are asked metacognitive questions, explore their thinking, make applications to other instances.

Metacognition briefly explored.

Maybe absent or confusion over the idea of thinking about thinking.

 

 

 

 


 

 EdTe 226

California State University, Sacramento
September, 2001