February 8, 2002
The hidden cost of sports sponsorship
Though the "right to carry cola"
hardly ranks with the Bill of Rights, many visitors to Salt
Lake City during this month's Winter Olympic Games will find
it's a freedom they no longer possess. A California State
University, Sacramento professor says the influence of corporate
sponsorship is beginning to infringe on civil rights.
"The controls sponsors put on the Olympics and the host
city are quite draconian," says Richard Batty, a professor
of recreation and leisure studies who has done research on
the costs of sports sponsorship. "They now require a
'clean zone' free of advertising. It raises real issues of
civil rights. In many cases these are public areas and people
are being told what they can wear or carry."
Sydney, for example, had boundaries around Olympic venues
where visitors were not allowed to bring in competing sponsors'
products. "There were even checkpoints to screen for
'bombs, knives and cans of Pepsi,' " he says. "Journalists
had to tape over the brand names on their laptops and cameras
if they were competitors of the official Olympic sponsor."
The cost of the maintaining the clean zone is borne by the
city, even though the money from the official Olympic sponsors
goes to the International Olympic Committee. And the Olympics
aren't alone in bowing to sponsor pressure. Similar restrictions
apply to many other major events like the NCAA Final Four,
"Sponsorship is always billed as 'win-win' - the sponsor
gets associated with a team or event, and the team or event
gets wads of cash. But there are costs on either side,"
he says. "It's not money for nothing, and the checks
aren't for free."
Batty started his research during his previous position at
the University of Otago in New Zealand when he assisted with
the FIFA Under-19 World Soccer Championships. He was amazed
at the demands the sponsors placed on the event, ranging from
freebies to only having their brand names shown at the venue
to changing the schedule of activities to fit their wishes.
With sponsorship, there is an expectation of giving up control,
Batty says. It's not a simple one-time economic relationship.
It has to build over time. And to maintain the relationship,
both sides have to throw in sweeteners.
He notes that football has changed the pacing of the game
to accommodate the needs of sponsors, pointing to the two-minute
warning and TV timeouts. Other sports, such as basketball,
have divided their game in quarters to satisfy the demands
of sponsors and the media.
And there's another cost, Batty says, a cost that's hidden
- the erosion of good will.
"The sponsor doesn't bear the cost straightaway but there's
an imaginary line they can push supporters to," Batty
says. "Baseball faced it when it considered putting logos
on uniform sleeves. There was a huge outcry and the powers
that be in baseball decided 'That's the line.'"
Though sponsorship issues occur in other areas of society,
sports is the obvious extreme, since 80 percent of sponsorship
is associated with sports. "The sports field is a contested
terrain, a battle in and around the field as well as between
the teams that are competing," Batty says.
Media assistance is available by calling the CSUS public affairs
office at (916) 278-6156.
further information send E-Mail to email@example.com or
Public Affairs (916)
Index of Stories
Return to CSUS Home Page