|
Chemistry's Assessment Plan
SUMMER ADVISEMENT AND ORIENTATION PERIODS FOR NEWLY ADMITTED
FRESHMEN AND TRANSFER STUDENTS
A. |
The student will take appropriate diagnostic placement
exams in English and Mathematics administered by the University. |
B.
|
Chemistry faculty advisors will meet with students to assess
appropriate placement in Chemistry courses.
|
C.
|
Students planning to take Chemistry 1A are required to pass
a diagnostic placement examination. If a passing score is
not achieved, students are advised to enroll in Chemistry
4.
|
FRESHMEN THROUGH SENIOR YEARS
A.
|
Students not taking the Chemistry 1A diagnostic test before
classes start will take it in the first laboratory period.
|
B.
|
Students must take the appropriate sequence of English, Mathematics
and Physics courses in order to succeed as a chemistry major.
Progress in these areas will be monitored by Chemistry faculty
advisors and appropriate recommendations will be given to
students based on their performance in the prerequisite courses.
|
C.
|
Students are expected to begin taking required English and
Mathematics courses in General Education in the first semester
of attendance or have completed them if they are transferring.
|
D.
|
Students are expected to develop their competence in eight
skill areas. Five of these are transferable skills taken from
general education courses and three [the last three]
are more specifically aimed at students majoring in Chemistry.
|
|
- Effective Writing
- Effective Oral Communication
- Critical Thinking (logic and rhetoric)
- Problem Solving and Critical Thinking
- Quantitative Analysis
- Library and Scientific Information Literacy
- Computer literacy
- Laboratory Skills
|
E.
|
A capstone project is required of students in Chemistry 125,
141 or 164 to assess students' ability to transfer many of
the skills listed above to a selected laboratory project.
The projects will require the use of chemical literature,
doing a laboratory project, preparing a paper, and presenting
the project in a poster presentation format to students, faculty
and others. Students will be expected to be able to answer
questions orally. Faculty will make a holistic judgment of
students= ability to transfer liberal arts skills to the field
of chemistry. Also, students will be assigned a grade.
|
BEYOND GRADUATION
|
A.
|
Recent Alumni will be surveyed every three years to determine
their satisfaction regarding the quality of their undergraduate
education and their preparedness for graduate school and/or
their entry level position in industry. They will also be
asked to suggest changes for improvements in the curriculum.
|
B.
|
All Alumni will be able to inform the Chemistry Department
of their successes and concerns in an alumni questionnaire
that will be included in any Chemistry Department newsletter.
|
CAPSTONE PROJECTS &
SENIOR RESEARCH:
Capstone projects and senior research consist of the following
components in the chemistry major: |
A.
|
Preparation: Students
|
|
- Explore a specific topic suitable for undergraduate student
research or capstone laboratory project in a subdiscipline
of chemistry in collaboration with one or more faculty members
in the department;
- Review safety literature and MSDS sheets of chemicals
to be used in project.
|
B. |
Execution of Research or Capstone Laboratory
Project |
|
As a result of these preparative activities,
the student, in collaboration with the faculty member in whose
laboratory or class the student:
- Describes the goals to be achieved in the project
- Describes and evaluates the experimental design to be
used in achieving the project goals;
- Delineates the protocol to be followed; describes and
evaluates experimental controls;
- Identifies, describes and evaluates specific techniques
and instrumentation to be used; gains competence in techniques
and/or instrumentation with which he/she is not familiar;
- Executes prescribed protocol;
- Records data generated from the experimental protocols;
provides charts, tables or graphs which summarize and/or
illustrate major results; completes any descriptive and/or
inferential statistical treatment of the data in order to
assess the certainty associated with the results;
- Articulates and evaluates interpretations made from the
data/results;
- Articulates and evaluates major conclusions of the experiment
or study;
- Addresses any problems encountered with achieving the
project goals
- Proposes future experiments to improve upon or extend
the present work.
|
C. Preparation of a Poster
(Note: Capstone courses will require a Poster.
An Oral Presentation and/or written report may be required.)
|
|
The student:
- Constructs a poster using the style and format
given in the individual course guidelines. In general, the
poster should closely follow the Formal Written Report.
- Writes with clear, accurate sentence structure using appropriate
terminology, spelling, grammar and punctuation.
- Successfully communicates the research in the Poster to
an audience, using the Poster as a visual aid.
|
D. Preparation of a Written Report
|
|
- A written report shall conform to the appropriate
research journal in the field. For example, the appropriate
journal for a project in organic chemistry is Journal
of Organic Chemistry. The instructor of the capstone
course will identify the appropriate journal.
- Generally, the report will have a title, abstract, introduction,
experimental section, results, discussion and references.
The format of each section is described in the respective
research journal.
- Utilizes an approved word processing program to produce
hard copies of text for revision, proofreading and final
copy.
- Reviews the paper for a.) logical train of thought, b.)
continuity and clarity of transitions between elements of
the topic, c.) consistency of style and approach, and d.)
balance between elements of the topic consistent with objective
of the paper.
- Writes with clear, accurate sentence structure using appropriate
and conventional words, grammar, and punctuation; uses correct
verb tense, symbols and abbreviations; avoids jargon, wordiness
and repetition.
|
E. Preparation of an Oral Presentation
|
|
The student:
- Utilizes a format in which the written report serves as
the basis for the oral presentation and the Introduction,
Materials and Methods, Results and Discussion sections comprise
the major portion of the presentation;
- Uses the appropriate audio-visual aids to illustrate the
presentation in a clear and concise manner. Uses supplementary
handouts during the presentation where appropriate;
- Avoids reading the presentation; presents from a list
of notes consisting of the main concepts and points to be
emphasized;
- Speaks slowly and clearly, maintaining eye contact with
the entire audience; uses appropriate gestures;
- Repeats difficult or confusing material using different
wording and invites questions at points in the presentation
which may be confusing;
- Ends the presentation at the designated time limit which
includes a review and emphasis of major points and conclusions
of the research;
|
|
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR FORMAL LAB REPORTS
-
Format The report contains the required
sections as per syllabus: Title, Abstract, Introduction, Results,
Discussion, and References.
-
Content Each section of the report contains
the appropriate type and amount of information.
-
Data analysis and presentation The data
are properly analyzed as well as clearly and neatly presented.
-
Conclusions The conclusions drawn from
the data are consistent with the data presented. The results of
the report are thoroughly discussed in the context of the present
experiment with extensive reference to the existing primary literature.
Errors in experimental measurements or design are thoroughly analyzed.
-
Writing
- Grammar The report contains
good grammar, including accurate spelling, good sentence construction,
appropriate use of punctuation, and proper word usage.
- Organization The writing in each section
of the report is organized, with a logical flow of ideas between
and within paragraphs.
- Style Each section of the report is
written in the appropriate style and in passive voice.
-
Presentation The report is presented well
and has an overall appearance that leaves a favorable impression
upon the reader "A" papers are those that flawlessly fulfill
all of the above criteria. "B" papers are those that
generally fulfill the criteria but may be less than excellent
in one or more areas. For example, a paper that has very good
data presentation but a somewhat choppy or clunky writing style
is more likely to be a "B" rather than an "A" paper."C" papers are those only fulfill some of the criteria and/or contain serious
flaws such as poor sentence structure, poor paragraph organization,
or shoddy data presentation."D" papers are those that contain
major flaws in several areas. "F" papers are those
that contain major flaws in several areas and are missing critical
information (such as the abstract or a reference list).
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR POSTER PRESENTATIONS
- Format The poster is properly constructed
in the format stated in the course guidelines and contains a Title
and the required sections such as Abstract, Materials and Methods,
Results, Conclusion, References.
- Content The poster successfully reports
the results of the project by focusing on the essential features
of the project while avoiding excessive wordiness.
- Writing The writing is smooth, concise,
well-organized, with good logical flow of ideas. The writing contains
good grammar with proper spelling, punctuation, sentence structure
and word usage.
- Results The poster shows that the student
understands the experimental procedures and experimental outcomes.
The student demonstrates an understanding of the quality of the
work.
- Data Analysis and Presentation The data
are carefully analyzed and presented in a clean, readable format.
Plots and tables are organized and clearly labeled so that the
reader can grasp the essential features of the data at a glance.
- Conclusions The conclusions are clearly
and simply laid out. The reader should be able to easily grasp
the overall results of the study from this section alone.
- Presentation The poster presentation is
clean, neat, uncongested, and easy to follow. "A" posters are those that flawlessly fulfill all of the above criteria. "B"
posters fulfill most of the criteria. A "B" poster may contain
major flaws in only one area or minor flaws in no more than two
areas."C" posters contain major flaws in two areas or minor
flaws in three areas. "D" posters contain major flaws
in three areas or minor flaws in most areas. "F" posters contain major flaws in three areas and are missing sections or
other critical information.
PRIMARY ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS
- Alumni Survey The first survey conducted by the department
encompassed the entire alumni population. The next alumni survey
is being conducted by Institutional Studies in the year 2000.
A future survey of alumni will focus on alumni who graduated after
the second survey was administered. The questions will focus on
concerns and issues of faculty based on a review of the results
of the first and second alumni survey. This survey will occur
in the three years after the second survey is completed.
- Writing in the Major A random selection of laboratory/poster
reports will be collected in chemistry 141 and 164 in the spring
semester. A committee composed of the instructors in the two courses
and two other faculty will review the reports to determine how
effectively students are meeting two criteria:OrganizationTechnical
writing skillsThe committee will prepare a report to the department
that discusses how effectively students performed in the two criteria
areas. Recommendations for improving, if necessary, the performance
of students will also be submitted. The faculty of the department
will discuss the recommendations and adopt appropriate recommendations
and action pathways.
- American Chemical Society Exams The department will initiate
a study of the feasibility of using American Chemical Society
examinations in the following courses
- Chemistry 124 Chemistry 140BChemistry 160B
The first step is a study of each ACS examination by a group of
faculty who teach these courses. Each study will consider: The
content covered in the exams compared to the content covered in
the course, the level of difficulty of the examination, how the
entire exam might be administered, and security of exam issues.
At the conclusion of each study, the faculty group will prepare
a written report to the faculty regarding the potential for administering
each exam at least once per academic year.The purpose of administering
an ACS exam is to compare the chemical knowledge competency of
chemistry degree students compared to a national norm.After receiving
the reports, the faculty will determine whether to administer
all or any of the ACS examinations. For those ACS examinations
approved for administration, a committee of the instructors of
the identified courses will meet annually and review the results.
A report will be developed and submitted to the department for
its review. At the end of the trial period, the department will
determine if continuation of the exams is justified.
|