sacramento state -  Office of Academic Affairs
sac state homeadmissionsabout sac stategiving a giftsite indexcontact us
    Department of Chemistry

Chemistry's Assessment Plan

SUMMER ADVISEMENT AND ORIENTATION PERIODS FOR NEWLY ADMITTED FRESHMEN AND TRANSFER STUDENTS

A.

The student will take appropriate diagnostic placement exams in English and Mathematics administered by the University.


B.


Chemistry faculty advisors will meet with students to assess appropriate placement in Chemistry courses.


C.


Students planning to take Chemistry 1A are required to pass a diagnostic placement examination. If a passing score is not achieved, students are advised to enroll in Chemistry 4.


FRESHMEN THROUGH SENIOR YEARS


A.


Students not taking the Chemistry 1A diagnostic test before classes start will take it in the first laboratory period.


B.


Students must take the appropriate sequence of English, Mathematics and Physics courses in order to succeed as a chemistry major. Progress in these areas will be monitored by Chemistry faculty advisors and appropriate recommendations will be given to students based on their performance in the prerequisite courses.


C.


Students are expected to begin taking required English and Mathematics courses in General Education in the first semester of attendance or have completed them if they are transferring.


D.


Students are expected to develop their competence in eight skill areas. Five of these are transferable skills taken from general education courses and three [the last three] are more specifically aimed at students majoring in Chemistry.

  1. Effective Writing
  2. Effective Oral Communication
  3. Critical Thinking (logic and rhetoric)
  4. Problem Solving and Critical Thinking
  5. Quantitative Analysis
  6. Library and Scientific Information Literacy
  7. Computer literacy
  8. Laboratory Skills


E.


A capstone project is required of students in Chemistry 125, 141 or 164 to assess students' ability to transfer many of the skills listed above to a selected laboratory project. The projects will require the use of chemical literature, doing a laboratory project, preparing a paper, and presenting the project in a poster presentation format to students, faculty and others. Students will be expected to be able to answer questions orally. Faculty will make a holistic judgment of students= ability to transfer liberal arts skills to the field of chemistry. Also, students will be assigned a grade.


BEYOND GRADUATION


A.


Recent Alumni will be surveyed every three years to determine their satisfaction regarding the quality of their undergraduate education and their preparedness for graduate school and/or their entry level position in industry. They will also be asked to suggest changes for improvements in the curriculum.


B.


All Alumni will be able to inform the Chemistry Department of their successes and concerns in an alumni questionnaire that will be included in any Chemistry Department newsletter. 


CAPSTONE PROJECTS & SENIOR RESEARCH:

Capstone projects and senior research consist of the following components in the chemistry major:


A.


Preparation: Students

  1. Explore a specific topic suitable for undergraduate student research or capstone laboratory project in a subdiscipline of chemistry in collaboration with one or more faculty members in the department;
  2. Review safety literature and MSDS sheets of chemicals to be used in project.

B.

Execution of Research or Capstone Laboratory Project

As a result of these preparative activities, the student, in collaboration with the faculty member in whose laboratory or class the student:

  1. Describes the goals to be achieved in the project
  2. Describes and evaluates the experimental design to be used in achieving the project goals;
  3. Delineates the protocol to be followed; describes and evaluates experimental controls;
  4. Identifies, describes and evaluates specific techniques and instrumentation to be used; gains competence in techniques and/or instrumentation with which he/she is not familiar;
  5. Executes prescribed protocol;
  6. Records data generated from the experimental protocols; provides charts, tables or graphs which summarize and/or illustrate major results; completes any descriptive and/or inferential statistical treatment of the data in order to assess the certainty associated with the results;
  7. Articulates and evaluates interpretations made from the data/results;
  8. Articulates and evaluates major conclusions of the experiment or study;
  9. Addresses any problems encountered with achieving the project goals
  10. Proposes future experiments to improve upon or extend the present work.


 C. Preparation of a Poster
 (Note: Capstone courses will require a Poster. An Oral Presentation and/or written report may be required.)


The student:

  1. Constructs a poster using the style and format given in the individual course guidelines. In general, the poster should closely follow the Formal Written Report.
  2. Writes with clear, accurate sentence structure using appropriate terminology, spelling, grammar and punctuation.
  3. Successfully communicates the research in the Poster to an audience, using the Poster as a visual aid. 


D. Preparation of a Written Report

  1. A written report shall conform to the appropriate research journal in the field. For example, the appropriate journal for a project in organic chemistry is Journal of Organic Chemistry. The instructor of the capstone course will identify the appropriate journal.
  2. Generally, the report will have a title, abstract, introduction, experimental section, results, discussion and references. The format of each section is described in the respective research journal.
  3. Utilizes an approved word processing program to produce hard copies of text for revision, proofreading and final copy.
  4. Reviews the paper for a.) logical train of thought, b.) continuity and clarity of transitions between elements of the topic, c.) consistency of style and approach, and d.) balance between elements of the topic consistent with objective of the paper.
  5. Writes with clear, accurate sentence structure using appropriate and conventional words, grammar, and punctuation; uses correct verb tense, symbols and abbreviations; avoids jargon, wordiness and repetition.


E. Preparation of an Oral Presentation

The student:

  1. Utilizes a format in which the written report serves as the basis for the oral presentation and the Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results and Discussion sections comprise the major portion of the presentation;
  2. Uses the appropriate audio-visual aids to illustrate the presentation in a clear and concise manner. Uses supplementary handouts during the presentation where appropriate;
  3. Avoids reading the presentation; presents from a list of notes consisting of the main concepts and points to be emphasized;
  4. Speaks slowly and clearly, maintaining eye contact with the entire audience; uses appropriate gestures;
  5. Repeats difficult or confusing material using different wording and invites questions at points in the presentation which may be confusing;
  6. Ends the presentation at the designated time limit which includes a review and emphasis of major points and conclusions of the research;

 
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR FORMAL LAB REPORTS 
  1. Format – The report contains the required sections as per syllabus: Title, Abstract, Introduction, Results, Discussion, and References. 
  2. Content – Each section of the report contains the appropriate type and amount of information.
  3. Data analysis and presentation – The data are properly analyzed as well as clearly and neatly presented.
  4. ConclusionsThe conclusions drawn from the data are consistent with the data presented. The results of the report are thoroughly discussed in the context of the present experiment with extensive reference to the existing primary literature. Errors in experimental measurements or design are thoroughly analyzed.
  5. Writing
    1. GrammarThe report contains good grammar, including accurate spelling, good sentence construction, appropriate use of punctuation, and proper word usage.
    2. Organization – The writing in each section of the report is organized, with a logical flow of ideas between and within paragraphs.
    3. Style – Each section of the report is written in the appropriate style and in passive voice.
  6. Presentation – The report is presented well and has an overall appearance that leaves a favorable impression upon the reader "A" papers are those that flawlessly fulfill all of the above criteria. "B" papers are those that generally fulfill the criteria but may be less than excellent in one or more areas. For example, a paper that has very good data presentation but a somewhat choppy or clunky writing style is more likely to be a "B" rather than an "A" paper."C" papers are those only fulfill some of the criteria and/or contain serious flaws such as poor sentence structure, poor paragraph organization, or shoddy data presentation."D" papers are those that contain major flaws in several areas. "F" papers are those that contain major flaws in several areas and are missing critical information (such as the abstract or a reference list).
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR POSTER PRESENTATIONS
  1. Format – The poster is properly constructed in the format stated in the course guidelines and contains a Title and the required sections such as Abstract, Materials and Methods, Results, Conclusion, References.
  2. Content – The poster successfully reports the results of the project by focusing on the essential features of the project while avoiding excessive wordiness.
  3. Writing – The writing is smooth, concise, well-organized, with good logical flow of ideas. The writing contains good grammar with proper spelling, punctuation, sentence structure and word usage.
  4. Results – The poster shows that the student understands the experimental procedures and experimental outcomes. The student demonstrates an understanding of the quality of the work. 
  5. Data Analysis and Presentation – The data are carefully analyzed and presented in a clean, readable format. Plots and tables are organized and clearly labeled so that the reader can grasp the essential features of the data at a glance.
  6. Conclusions – The conclusions are clearly and simply laid out. The reader should be able to easily grasp the overall results of the study from this section alone.
  7. Presentation – The poster presentation is clean, neat, uncongested, and easy to follow. "A" posters are those that flawlessly fulfill all of the above criteria. "B" posters fulfill most of the criteria. A "B" poster may contain major flaws in only one area or minor flaws in no more than two areas."C" posters contain major flaws in two areas or minor flaws in three areas. "D" posters contain major flaws in three areas or minor flaws in most areas. "F" posters contain major flaws in three areas and are missing sections or other critical information.
 PRIMARY ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS
  1. Alumni Survey The first survey conducted by the department encompassed the entire alumni population. The next alumni survey is being conducted by Institutional Studies in the year 2000. A future survey of alumni will focus on alumni who graduated after the second survey was administered. The questions will focus on concerns and issues of faculty based on a review of the results of the first and second alumni survey. This survey will occur in the three years after the second survey is completed.
  2. Writing in the Major A random selection of laboratory/poster reports will be collected in chemistry 141 and 164 in the spring semester. A committee composed of the instructors in the two courses and two other faculty will review the reports to determine how effectively students are meeting two criteria:OrganizationTechnical writing skillsThe committee will prepare a report to the department that discusses how effectively students performed in the two criteria areas. Recommendations for improving, if necessary, the performance of students will also be submitted. The faculty of the department will discuss the recommendations and adopt appropriate recommendations and action pathways.
  3. American Chemical Society Exams The department will initiate a study of the feasibility of using American Chemical Society examinations in the following courses
    1. Chemistry 124 Chemistry 140BChemistry 160B
    The first step is a study of each ACS examination by a group of faculty who teach these courses. Each study will consider: The content covered in the exams compared to the content covered in the course, the level of difficulty of the examination, how the entire exam might be administered, and security of exam issues. At the conclusion of each study, the faculty group will prepare a written report to the faculty regarding the potential for administering each exam at least once per academic year.The purpose of administering an ACS exam is to compare the chemical knowledge competency of chemistry degree students compared to a national norm.After receiving the reports, the faculty will determine whether to administer all or any of the ACS examinations. For those ACS examinations approved for administration, a committee of the instructors of the identified courses will meet annually and review the results. A report will be developed and submitted to the department for its review. At the end of the trial period, the department will determine if continuation of the exams is justified.