Coal-fired Power Plants
What is Coal Exactly?
- A readily combustible brownish-black sedimentary rock
- A “fossil fuel” – compressed remains of plant and/or animal
life
- Composed primarily of carbon and hydrogen, along with small quantities of
other elements, primarily sulfur
Electricity Production
- Burning of coal (or any fossil fuel) produces CO2 and water vapor, and
releases heat
- Heat is used to turn turbines to generate electricity
- Process is only 35% efficient
- The primary type of coal-fired power plant in the world today is a pulverized
coal combustion system
A Typical Pulverized Coal Combustion Plant: Image
What's in that cloud?
- Problem – release of CO2, a greenhouse gas
- Coal is the largest contributor to human-made increase in CO2
- In 2004, U.S. coal-fired power plants produced more CO2 than was produced
by all sources in Africa and South and Central America combined
- Also releases other chemicals/compounds
- Fine Particulates
- NOx
- Mercury
- SO2 (acid rain)
- Radioactive materials (Uranium, Thorium, etc.)
Statistics
- 97% of deadly fine particle soot and sulfur dioxide emissions;
- 92% of smog-forming nitrogen oxide emissions;
- 86% of emissions of carbon dioxide, the primary global warming pollutant
- Almost 100% of toxic mercury emissions
Health Impacts
- Fine particle pollution
- Particles are able to get deep into lungs and can enter bloodstream
- Exacerbates existing conditions such as asthma and heart and lung disease
- Triggers heart attack by causing irregular heartbeat
- 23,600 people are killed from this each year- more than drunk driving and
homicide!
- Also has been linked to an increase in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
So Why Use Coal?
- It’s Cheap!
- US has a 245 year supply of coal reserves
- These reserves contain more energy than the world’s oil reserves
(The Saudi Arabia of Coal)
- States that use primarily coal fuel to produce electricity have the lowest
electricity rates in the nation
- Existing infrastructure (power plants) are more cost-effective
US Coal Reserves: Map
A Case Study in Coal Use: California
- The U.S. is now the world leader in wind electricity generation.
- Currently produce over 20,000 MW
- 4.5 million homes
Energy Source: Electricity |
US Average |
California Average |
Coal |
50% |
20% |
Natural Gas |
19% |
38% |
Nuclear |
19% |
15% |
Large Hydro |
7% |
17% |
Biomass |
0.4% |
2.1% |
Geothermal |
0.4% |
5.0% |
Wind |
0.4% |
1.5% |
Small Hydro |
- |
1.9% |
Solar |
- |
0.3% |
So What Are the Options?
- “Fix” coal power
- Make it “cleaner” – 2002 Clean Coal Power Initiative
- Find new sources of energy
- New sources should be cost-comparable with coal to be feasible
Clean Coal
- Carbon Sequestration
- Capture and store the carbon dioxide before it is released into the
atmosphere
- Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle (IGCC): Image
- Breaks down and “cleans” coal prior to combustion
- Added benefit of producing clean H2, which could be used in other applications
Is Clean Coal the Best Option?
- California Public Utilities Commission reports:
- Clean coal – 17 cents per kilowatt hour
- Utility-scale solar power – 12.7 cents per KWh
- Wind power – 9 cents per KWh
- In the long run, “green” energy is more cost-effective than
“clean” coal; however, “dirty” coal still cheapest
- So, what should be done? What do you think?