
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Your Score
|
Layout
|
Design
is messy and unattractive. Does not make good use of available space. Poor
balance of text and graphics.
|
Design
is inconsistent. Some parts are attractive and space-efficient, but other
parts are not. Inconsistent or poor balance between text and
graphics.
|
Design
is mostly attractive and space efficient. Good balance of text and
graphics, for the most part.
|
Design
is attractive and space-efficient. Excellent balance of text and graphics
throughout.
|
|
Supplementary
features (e.g. graphs, letters, classified ads, print ads, etc.)
|
No
supplementary features are included.
|
A few
supplementary features are included.
|
Many
supplementary features are included.
|
Many outstanding
supplementary features are included.
|
|
Mechanics
|
Text
contains many spelling/grammar errors. Sentences seem disconnected, and
there is carelessness throughout.
|
Text
contains some spelling/grammar errors. Little logical structure or flow to sentences.
Evidence of carelessness in writing.
|
Grammar
and spelling are nearly flawless. Logical sequence apparent. Some wording
is careless. Inconsistent in style.
|
Grammar
and spelling are flawless and the flow provides a logical pathway of ideas.
Consistent and engaging style throughout.
|
|
Articles
|
Article
is inappropriately informal and confusing to read. No attempt has been made
to engage the reader with a good lead or a clear and logical presentation
of facts.
|
Article
lacks some necessary elements of a newspaper article: a good lead, clear
presentation of facts, and/or an appropriately formal writing style.
|
Articles
have good leads, logical and clear presentation of facts, and formal
writing style.
|
Articles
have good leads, logical and clear presentation of facts, and an
appropriately formal writing style. Articles are interesting to read and
hold reader's attention.
|
|
Editorials
|
Editorials
do not clearly express opinions.
|
Editorials
clearly express opinions, but the opinions are supported with rhetoric, not
facts.
|
Editorials
clearly express opinions, which are supported with facts.
|
Editorials
clearly express opinions, which are supported with facts. Additionally, the
editorials are interesting to read, with a consistent and engaging writing
style.
|
|
Graphics
|
Graphics
do not clearly support or relate to the text.
|
Graphics
sometimes support and/or relate to the text.
|
Graphics
usually support and/or relate to the text.
|
Graphics
consistently support and/or relate to the text.
|
|