WPE
SAMPLE READING PASSAGE AND PROMPT
WPE TITLE
“Secondhand Smoking Dangers”
Editorial,
The Sacramento Bee, January 1998
In a significant boon to public health and worker safety, the California Legislature in 1994 banned
smoking in nearly all enclosed workplaces. But bowing to the clout of the restaurant and bar industries and
the social realities of smoking, the initial ban did not include bars, taverns, and gaming facilities.
For those workplaces, the ban was to be phased in, originally by January 1997. But under legislation
approved last year, even that implementation date was pushed back to January 1998. Now, Assemblyman
Dick Floyd has introduced a bill to extend the exemption indefinitely. His measure callously exposes one
category of workers to the deadly hazards of secondhand smoke.
According to the California Department of Health Services secondhand smoke has been linked to lung
cancer, lung disease, heart disease and other cancers in nonsmoking adults, killing an estimated 53,000
nonsmokers in the United States every year.
Bar employees face an especially elevated risk. Their exposure to secondhand smoke is estimated to be
four to six times higher than other food or beverage service workers. According to the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, smoke-filled rooms can have up to six times the air pollution as a busy highway.
In the past, individual bar and restaurant owners have claimed that a smoking ban would put them out of
business and have negative impacts on their industry and tourism in California overall. But in many
California communities where local ordinances have banned smoking in bars for years, no such adverse
impacts have been noticed. In Marin County, 93 percent of restaurants reported no change or an
improvement in business after the local ban went into effect. A survey in the city of San Luis Obispo two
years after its ban went into effect found "no evidence of a negative economic impact."
The Floyd bill is opposed by the California Restaurant Association, the California Labor Federation, the
American Lung Association, California Medical Association and virtually every other public health
organization in the state. It is up before the Assembly Labor Committee on Wednesday, where it deserves
to be defeated.
The Sacramento Bee editorial calls for tighter smoking
bans in restaurants and bars,
applying
to them the same laws now governing smoking in public places in California.
Drawing
upon the reading passage above and your own experience, explain your views
on
smoking bans in bars, taverns and gaming facilities and your reasons for those
views.
Note:
While you are asked to give your opinion, your essay should also reflect a
thoughtful
consideration of the reading passage.