Philosophy of Religion syllabus (Fall 2011)
Schedule and assigned readings
- also find links to videos and handouts in SacCT
1. What is religion? wks 1-2
- Part 1: The Nature of Religion - intro
- Dennett, p. 10: An evolutionary account of religion
- Trigg, p. 22: A defense of religious realism
2. What do mystical experiences tell us? wk 3
- Part 2: Religious Experience - intro
- Teresa, p. 40: Religious experiences
- James, p. 43: Religious experience as feelings forming the root of religion
- Alston, p. 51: Religious experience as perception of God
- Martin, p. 68: Critique of religious experience
3. Should one believe in miracles? wks 4-5
- Part 10: Miracles - intro
- Hume, p. 441: The evidence for miracles is weak
- Mackie, p. 448: Miracles and testimony
- Swinburne, p. 455: Miracles and historical evidence
4. Can one be good without God? wk 6
- Part 14: Religion and Morality - intro
- MacIntyre, p. 612: Which God ought we to obey?
- Aquinas, p. 619: Ethics and natural law
- Sartre, p. 622: Ethics without religion
5. Why is there so much pain and suffering? wks 7-8
- Part 7: The Problem
of Evil - intro
- Hume, p. 276: Evil makes a strong case against God's existence
- Leibniz, p. 282: Best of all possible worlds theodicy
- Hick, p. 316: Soul-making theodicy
- Rowe, p. 324: The evidential argument from evil
6. Can one prove God exists? wks 9-11
- Part 5: Arguments About God's Existence - intro
- Anselm, p. 169: The classical ontological argument
- Gaunilo, p. 171: Critique of Anselm's argument
- Aquinas, p. 184: The classical cosmological argument
- Mackie, p. 205: Critique of the cosmological argument
- Paley, p. 212: The analogical teleological argument
- Hume, p. 215: Critique of the analogical teleological argument
- Collins: The Case for Cosmic Design - link -
- Draper: Collins' Case for Cosmic Design - link -
7. Does reason support or undermine faith? wks 12-13
- Part 3: Faith and Reason - intro
- Aquinas, p. 92: The harmony of reason and revelation
- Pascal, p. 96: The wager
- Clifford, p. 99: The ethics of belief
- Dawkins:
Viruses of the Mind - link -
- Hitchens: Belief in Belief - link -
- Harris: An
Atheist Manifesto - link -
- The God Debate: Hitchens vs. D'Souza - video -
- The God Debate II: Harris vs. Craig - video -
8. Are science and religion compatible? wks 14-15
- Part 12: Science and Religion - intro
- Gould, p. 515: Two separate domains
- Dawkins, p. 523: Science discredits religion
|

|
Course Description
PHIL 131. Philosophy of Religion. Introduction to philosophical theology, the philosophical
study of religious assertions, arguments, and beliefs: the existence and nature
of
God; the rationality
of religious belief; the relation of faith to reason; the problem of evil;
immortality and resurrection; the possibility of miracles; the meaning of
religious language. Includes both traditional and contemporary approaches.
3 units.
I present this course as a reasoned debate about two worldviews:
theism and atheism. Expect a rigorous, critical examination
of religious
assertions,
arguments,
explanations
and beliefs,
including but not limited to: answers to enduring questions about God; the
relation of faith to reason; the problem of evil and human freedom; the
possibility of miracles; the implications of religious experience; the
tensions between religion and science, religion and ethics.
This
course satisfies GE Area C3: Introduction to the Humanities by
discussing over two thousand years of human history, tradition and debate
about the nature and
scope of the divine while considering typical faith-based and intellectual
attitudes, values and beliefs from major
religious traditions such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity,
and Islam.
Required course text: Philosophy
of Religion: Selected Readings, edited by Michael Peterson, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach and David Basinger (2010,
4th ed.) and supplemental readings listed on the schedule above. Only this
edition of the text will suffice. Appx. $50 at amazon.com.
Assignments, Grades and Attendance
- THREE in-class unannounced short-answer
quizzes (12 pts. each), TWO online quizzes in SacCT (13 pts. each). Online quizzes are already scheduled in SacCT, so check availability there.
- There will be no special treatment. No one can take any quiz after it has closed. There is no extra work or credit offered and students cannot re-take or make-up any quiz, absolutely, no exceptions. There isn't time for this and it is unfair to give people special consideration. There are plenty of points
available so that one can miss a quiz and still do well in the course. See the FAQ section 1 for a fuller rationale.
- Please keep track of your own grades via SacCT, I don't do grade
checks, since you can do it for yourself.
- When and where is the final for this course? The final
is just the last online quiz which is available only via SacCT. There is
no class meeting during finals week to take this quiz, you take it online.
The final quiz is already scheduled, check in SacCT under "Assessments" for
exact availability.
- Students may NOT use phones, laptops, or recording devices during class meetings. They are unnecessary
distractions and disrupt the class. Why? Here is
my argument. Persistently disruptive students will
be warned, identified and dismissed.
- Here is my official
grade-scale for ALL online quizzes and the overall course grade:
- 12 or above = A, 11 = A-, 10 = B+,
9 = B, 8 = B-, 7 = C+, 6 = C, 5 = C-, 3 = D, less than 3 = F
- How are grades assigned?
- For each quiz you will receive a numerical
score which
corresponds to a letter-grade on my grade-scale (above). Scores correspond
to letter-grades NOT percentages.
- How do I determine your overall course grade?
- There are 62 total points available. I add all
points earned, divide this
total by 4, then assign the letter-grade based on my grade-scale
(above). For instance, if one earns a total of 27 points, divide this
by 4, the result is a 6.7 which corresponds to a C on my letter-grade
scale. Thus, one receives a C for the course. Since rounding introduces
error, I will not round scores up or down. Overall course grade
= total points earned divided by 4, then apply my official grade scale.
Objectives
- DEFINE philosophical and theological terms used in the course,
- DISTINGUISH various philosophical concepts, theories and positions,
- ENGAGE in cogent and respectful discussion about controversial religious
issues,
- ANALYZE and PRODUCE practical, principle-based philosophical arguments,
- APPLY philosophical theories to religious dilemmas in professional and
personal life.
If you have a disability and require accommodations, you need to provide
disability documentation to SSWD, Lassen Hall 1008, (916) 278-6955. Please
discuss accomodations needs with me after class or during my office hours
early in the semester.
Review all academic responsibilities, definitions, sanctions and rights
described here.
"When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child,
I reasoned like a child;
when I became an adult, I put an end to childish
ways."
- I Corinthians,
13: 11.
"A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely
rearranging their prejudices."
- William James